Developing an indicator framework for assessing sustainable tourism: Evidence from a Taiwan ecological resort
Scientific understanding of the sustainability indicators of existing nature-based tourism businesses is limited. This study aims to explore a sustainability indicator framework, evaluate the indicator weights and assess performance using a case of a forest ecological resort through three studies. S...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/9f3b59113d62400b9b0400d12b045e56 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:9f3b59113d62400b9b0400d12b045e56 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:9f3b59113d62400b9b0400d12b045e562021-12-01T04:48:59ZDeveloping an indicator framework for assessing sustainable tourism: Evidence from a Taiwan ecological resort1470-160X10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107596https://doaj.org/article/9f3b59113d62400b9b0400d12b045e562021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21002612https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160XScientific understanding of the sustainability indicators of existing nature-based tourism businesses is limited. This study aims to explore a sustainability indicator framework, evaluate the indicator weights and assess performance using a case of a forest ecological resort through three studies. Study 1 explores sustainability indicators for ecological resorts, study 2 calculates the relative weights of each sustainability indicator, and study 3 evaluates the sustainability performance of a forest ecological resort. The analysis revealed 89 indicators classified into six categories: environmental managements, economic management, socio-cultural management, science and technology, human resource management, and government policy. The weights of each indicator were calculated via the analytic hierarchy process with 21 participants. At the first level, the weight of environmental management (0.362) was higher than the weights of the other dimensions (range: 0.192–0.097). The resort’s performance was assessed in terms of importance and performance. The present study’s findings effectively develop a sustainability indicator framework for assessing sustainable tourism that provides valuable theoretical and managerial references, extends our knowledge of sustainable resort development and significantly contributes to the literature.Tsung Hung LeeFen-Hauh JanJui-Tu LiuElsevierarticleSustainable tourismEcological resortSustainability indicatorsAnalytic hierarchy processEcologyQH540-549.5ENEcological Indicators, Vol 125, Iss , Pp 107596- (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Sustainable tourism Ecological resort Sustainability indicators Analytic hierarchy process Ecology QH540-549.5 |
spellingShingle |
Sustainable tourism Ecological resort Sustainability indicators Analytic hierarchy process Ecology QH540-549.5 Tsung Hung Lee Fen-Hauh Jan Jui-Tu Liu Developing an indicator framework for assessing sustainable tourism: Evidence from a Taiwan ecological resort |
description |
Scientific understanding of the sustainability indicators of existing nature-based tourism businesses is limited. This study aims to explore a sustainability indicator framework, evaluate the indicator weights and assess performance using a case of a forest ecological resort through three studies. Study 1 explores sustainability indicators for ecological resorts, study 2 calculates the relative weights of each sustainability indicator, and study 3 evaluates the sustainability performance of a forest ecological resort. The analysis revealed 89 indicators classified into six categories: environmental managements, economic management, socio-cultural management, science and technology, human resource management, and government policy. The weights of each indicator were calculated via the analytic hierarchy process with 21 participants. At the first level, the weight of environmental management (0.362) was higher than the weights of the other dimensions (range: 0.192–0.097). The resort’s performance was assessed in terms of importance and performance. The present study’s findings effectively develop a sustainability indicator framework for assessing sustainable tourism that provides valuable theoretical and managerial references, extends our knowledge of sustainable resort development and significantly contributes to the literature. |
format |
article |
author |
Tsung Hung Lee Fen-Hauh Jan Jui-Tu Liu |
author_facet |
Tsung Hung Lee Fen-Hauh Jan Jui-Tu Liu |
author_sort |
Tsung Hung Lee |
title |
Developing an indicator framework for assessing sustainable tourism: Evidence from a Taiwan ecological resort |
title_short |
Developing an indicator framework for assessing sustainable tourism: Evidence from a Taiwan ecological resort |
title_full |
Developing an indicator framework for assessing sustainable tourism: Evidence from a Taiwan ecological resort |
title_fullStr |
Developing an indicator framework for assessing sustainable tourism: Evidence from a Taiwan ecological resort |
title_full_unstemmed |
Developing an indicator framework for assessing sustainable tourism: Evidence from a Taiwan ecological resort |
title_sort |
developing an indicator framework for assessing sustainable tourism: evidence from a taiwan ecological resort |
publisher |
Elsevier |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/9f3b59113d62400b9b0400d12b045e56 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tsunghunglee developinganindicatorframeworkforassessingsustainabletourismevidencefromataiwanecologicalresort AT fenhauhjan developinganindicatorframeworkforassessingsustainabletourismevidencefromataiwanecologicalresort AT juituliu developinganindicatorframeworkforassessingsustainabletourismevidencefromataiwanecologicalresort |
_version_ |
1718405740212781056 |