Developing an indicator framework for assessing sustainable tourism: Evidence from a Taiwan ecological resort

Scientific understanding of the sustainability indicators of existing nature-based tourism businesses is limited. This study aims to explore a sustainability indicator framework, evaluate the indicator weights and assess performance using a case of a forest ecological resort through three studies. S...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsung Hung Lee, Fen-Hauh Jan, Jui-Tu Liu
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/9f3b59113d62400b9b0400d12b045e56
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:9f3b59113d62400b9b0400d12b045e56
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:9f3b59113d62400b9b0400d12b045e562021-12-01T04:48:59ZDeveloping an indicator framework for assessing sustainable tourism: Evidence from a Taiwan ecological resort1470-160X10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107596https://doaj.org/article/9f3b59113d62400b9b0400d12b045e562021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21002612https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160XScientific understanding of the sustainability indicators of existing nature-based tourism businesses is limited. This study aims to explore a sustainability indicator framework, evaluate the indicator weights and assess performance using a case of a forest ecological resort through three studies. Study 1 explores sustainability indicators for ecological resorts, study 2 calculates the relative weights of each sustainability indicator, and study 3 evaluates the sustainability performance of a forest ecological resort. The analysis revealed 89 indicators classified into six categories: environmental managements, economic management, socio-cultural management, science and technology, human resource management, and government policy. The weights of each indicator were calculated via the analytic hierarchy process with 21 participants. At the first level, the weight of environmental management (0.362) was higher than the weights of the other dimensions (range: 0.192–0.097). The resort’s performance was assessed in terms of importance and performance. The present study’s findings effectively develop a sustainability indicator framework for assessing sustainable tourism that provides valuable theoretical and managerial references, extends our knowledge of sustainable resort development and significantly contributes to the literature.Tsung Hung LeeFen-Hauh JanJui-Tu LiuElsevierarticleSustainable tourismEcological resortSustainability indicatorsAnalytic hierarchy processEcologyQH540-549.5ENEcological Indicators, Vol 125, Iss , Pp 107596- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Sustainable tourism
Ecological resort
Sustainability indicators
Analytic hierarchy process
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle Sustainable tourism
Ecological resort
Sustainability indicators
Analytic hierarchy process
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Tsung Hung Lee
Fen-Hauh Jan
Jui-Tu Liu
Developing an indicator framework for assessing sustainable tourism: Evidence from a Taiwan ecological resort
description Scientific understanding of the sustainability indicators of existing nature-based tourism businesses is limited. This study aims to explore a sustainability indicator framework, evaluate the indicator weights and assess performance using a case of a forest ecological resort through three studies. Study 1 explores sustainability indicators for ecological resorts, study 2 calculates the relative weights of each sustainability indicator, and study 3 evaluates the sustainability performance of a forest ecological resort. The analysis revealed 89 indicators classified into six categories: environmental managements, economic management, socio-cultural management, science and technology, human resource management, and government policy. The weights of each indicator were calculated via the analytic hierarchy process with 21 participants. At the first level, the weight of environmental management (0.362) was higher than the weights of the other dimensions (range: 0.192–0.097). The resort’s performance was assessed in terms of importance and performance. The present study’s findings effectively develop a sustainability indicator framework for assessing sustainable tourism that provides valuable theoretical and managerial references, extends our knowledge of sustainable resort development and significantly contributes to the literature.
format article
author Tsung Hung Lee
Fen-Hauh Jan
Jui-Tu Liu
author_facet Tsung Hung Lee
Fen-Hauh Jan
Jui-Tu Liu
author_sort Tsung Hung Lee
title Developing an indicator framework for assessing sustainable tourism: Evidence from a Taiwan ecological resort
title_short Developing an indicator framework for assessing sustainable tourism: Evidence from a Taiwan ecological resort
title_full Developing an indicator framework for assessing sustainable tourism: Evidence from a Taiwan ecological resort
title_fullStr Developing an indicator framework for assessing sustainable tourism: Evidence from a Taiwan ecological resort
title_full_unstemmed Developing an indicator framework for assessing sustainable tourism: Evidence from a Taiwan ecological resort
title_sort developing an indicator framework for assessing sustainable tourism: evidence from a taiwan ecological resort
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/9f3b59113d62400b9b0400d12b045e56
work_keys_str_mv AT tsunghunglee developinganindicatorframeworkforassessingsustainabletourismevidencefromataiwanecologicalresort
AT fenhauhjan developinganindicatorframeworkforassessingsustainabletourismevidencefromataiwanecologicalresort
AT juituliu developinganindicatorframeworkforassessingsustainabletourismevidencefromataiwanecologicalresort
_version_ 1718405740212781056