The right to a reasoned order on determination of special evidentiary actions and (critical) review of the practice of the European court of human rights

Increasingly dangerous, and internationally distributed, (organized) crime has caused the need for states to find adequate means to put an end to all this. Of course, today, as many years before, we can hear that criminals are "one step ahead of the state." That, when we look at the situat...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Pejović Krsto, Paović Nina
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN SR
Publicado:	University of Belgrade - Faculty of Law, Belgrade & Institute of Comparative Law, Belgrade 2021
Materias:	special evidentiary actions illegal evidence measures of secret surveillance right to a fair trail right to respect for private and family life Criminal law and procedure K5000-5582 Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology HV1-9960
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/9f7351f657274ab39c9dfc5bad7e3404
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:9f7351f657274ab39c9dfc5bad7e3404
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:9f7351f657274ab39c9dfc5bad7e34042021-12-05T20:58:25ZThe right to a reasoned order on determination of special evidentiary actions and (critical) review of the practice of the European court of human rights2217-219X2683-580010.5937/crimen2102198Phttps://doaj.org/article/9f7351f657274ab39c9dfc5bad7e34042021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/2217-219X/2021/2217-219X2102198P.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2217-219Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2683-5800Increasingly dangerous, and internationally distributed, (organized) crime has caused the need for states to find adequate means to put an end to all this. Of course, today, as many years before, we can hear that criminals are "one step ahead of the state." That, when we look at the situation around us, is unfortunately not far from the truth. However, faced with this problem, states at the normative level, in order to anticipate criminal behavior, as well as, if the crime has already been committed, to reliably identify the perpetrators, stipulate (besides general evidentiary actions) special evidentiary actions/techniques in national legislation. That is quite legitimate. However, when the state prescribes certain rules, or conditions under which certain (evidentiary) actions must be taken, then it is more than unusual that state does not respect what it has prescribed. In the following lines, we were dealing with special evidentiary actions, predominantly the general characteristics of the same and in connection with them the practice of the ECtHR. All this with the aim of trying to present (from our point of view) a plausible practice, with the hope that we will break with the previous one, which in our opinion is not good.Pejović KrstoPaović NinaUniversity of Belgrade - Faculty of Law, Belgrade & Institute of Comparative Law, Belgradearticlespecial evidentiary actionsillegal evidencemeasures of secret surveillanceright to a fair trailright to respect for private and family lifeCriminal law and procedureK5000-5582Social pathology. Social and public welfare. CriminologyHV1-9960ENSRCrimen (Beograd), Vol 12, Iss 2, Pp 198-215 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN SR
topic	special evidentiary actions illegal evidence measures of secret surveillance right to a fair trail right to respect for private and family life Criminal law and procedure K5000-5582 Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology HV1-9960
spellingShingle	special evidentiary actions illegal evidence measures of secret surveillance right to a fair trail right to respect for private and family life Criminal law and procedure K5000-5582 Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology HV1-9960 Pejović Krsto Paović Nina The right to a reasoned order on determination of special evidentiary actions and (critical) review of the practice of the European court of human rights
description	Increasingly dangerous, and internationally distributed, (organized) crime has caused the need for states to find adequate means to put an end to all this. Of course, today, as many years before, we can hear that criminals are "one step ahead of the state." That, when we look at the situation around us, is unfortunately not far from the truth. However, faced with this problem, states at the normative level, in order to anticipate criminal behavior, as well as, if the crime has already been committed, to reliably identify the perpetrators, stipulate (besides general evidentiary actions) special evidentiary actions/techniques in national legislation. That is quite legitimate. However, when the state prescribes certain rules, or conditions under which certain (evidentiary) actions must be taken, then it is more than unusual that state does not respect what it has prescribed. In the following lines, we were dealing with special evidentiary actions, predominantly the general characteristics of the same and in connection with them the practice of the ECtHR. All this with the aim of trying to present (from our point of view) a plausible practice, with the hope that we will break with the previous one, which in our opinion is not good.
format	article
author	Pejović Krsto Paović Nina
author_facet	Pejović Krsto Paović Nina
author_sort	Pejović Krsto
title	The right to a reasoned order on determination of special evidentiary actions and (critical) review of the practice of the European court of human rights
title_short	The right to a reasoned order on determination of special evidentiary actions and (critical) review of the practice of the European court of human rights
title_full	The right to a reasoned order on determination of special evidentiary actions and (critical) review of the practice of the European court of human rights
title_fullStr	The right to a reasoned order on determination of special evidentiary actions and (critical) review of the practice of the European court of human rights
title_full_unstemmed	The right to a reasoned order on determination of special evidentiary actions and (critical) review of the practice of the European court of human rights
title_sort	right to a reasoned order on determination of special evidentiary actions and (critical) review of the practice of the european court of human rights
publisher	University of Belgrade - Faculty of Law, Belgrade & Institute of Comparative Law, Belgrade
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/9f7351f657274ab39c9dfc5bad7e3404
work_keys_str_mv	AT pejovickrsto therighttoareasonedorderondeterminationofspecialevidentiaryactionsandcriticalreviewofthepracticeoftheeuropeancourtofhumanrights AT paovicnina therighttoareasonedorderondeterminationofspecialevidentiaryactionsandcriticalreviewofthepracticeoftheeuropeancourtofhumanrights AT pejovickrsto righttoareasonedorderondeterminationofspecialevidentiaryactionsandcriticalreviewofthepracticeoftheeuropeancourtofhumanrights AT paovicnina righttoareasonedorderondeterminationofspecialevidentiaryactionsandcriticalreviewofthepracticeoftheeuropeancourtofhumanrights
_version_	1718371019937284096

The right to a reasoned order on determination of special evidentiary actions and (critical) review of the practice of the European court of human rights

Ejemplares similares