Comparison of bone healing in immediate implant placement versus delayed implant placement

Introduction: Today, modern surgical and regenerative techniques with implant immediately placed into the prepared socket, predictable gap repair with bone substitutes and soft tissue grafts, have helped to eliminate concerns about bone deficiencies and allowed implant placement according to prostho...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Gagandeep Singh, Rajat Pareek, Gaurav Singh Rajawat, Aljeeta Kadam, Mahmoud Al Abdulsalam, Abdulrahman Al Abdulathim
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021
Materias:	bone healing graft implant prosthodontic rehabilitation Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/9f902455c1034206a23338c007b9f3a3
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:9f902455c1034206a23338c007b9f3a3
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:9f902455c1034206a23338c007b9f3a32021-11-19T12:15:52ZComparison of bone healing in immediate implant placement versus delayed implant placement0975-740610.4103/jpbs.jpbs_136_21https://doaj.org/article/9f902455c1034206a23338c007b9f3a32021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=6;spage=1309;epage=1314;aulast=Singhhttps://doaj.org/toc/0975-7406Introduction: Today, modern surgical and regenerative techniques with implant immediately placed into the prepared socket, predictable gap repair with bone substitutes and soft tissue grafts, have helped to eliminate concerns about bone deficiencies and allowed implant placement according to prosthodontic needs. Materials and Methods: The present in vivo study was designed to evaluate and compare the implant healing after immediate implant placement with or without bone graft and implant healing after delayed implant placement with or without bone graft. Crestal bone levels were compared in both the groups at preoperatively and postoperatively on immediate postoperatively, at 3rd month, and at 6th month. Results: Immediate implant group has more crestal bone level reduction at 3rd and 6th months as compared to the delayed implant group. Immediate implant with bone graft group has insignificant crestal bone level reduction at 3rd and 6th months as compared to immediate implant without bone graft group. Delayed implant with bone graft group has insignificant crestal bone level reduction at 3rd and 6th months as compared to delayed implant without bone graft group. Conclusion: It was concluded from this study that clinical and radiographical bone healing in the delayed implant group with or without bone graft (Group Y) appears to be better than the immediate dental implant group with or without bone graft (Group X).Gagandeep SinghRajat PareekGaurav Singh RajawatAljeeta KadamMahmoud Al AbdulsalamAbdulrahman Al AbdulathimWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsarticlebone healinggraftimplantprosthodontic rehabilitationPharmacy and materia medicaRS1-441Analytical chemistryQD71-142ENJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, Vol 13, Iss 6, Pp 1309-1314 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	bone healing graft implant prosthodontic rehabilitation Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142
spellingShingle	bone healing graft implant prosthodontic rehabilitation Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142 Gagandeep Singh Rajat Pareek Gaurav Singh Rajawat Aljeeta Kadam Mahmoud Al Abdulsalam Abdulrahman Al Abdulathim Comparison of bone healing in immediate implant placement versus delayed implant placement
description	Introduction: Today, modern surgical and regenerative techniques with implant immediately placed into the prepared socket, predictable gap repair with bone substitutes and soft tissue grafts, have helped to eliminate concerns about bone deficiencies and allowed implant placement according to prosthodontic needs. Materials and Methods: The present in vivo study was designed to evaluate and compare the implant healing after immediate implant placement with or without bone graft and implant healing after delayed implant placement with or without bone graft. Crestal bone levels were compared in both the groups at preoperatively and postoperatively on immediate postoperatively, at 3rd month, and at 6th month. Results: Immediate implant group has more crestal bone level reduction at 3rd and 6th months as compared to the delayed implant group. Immediate implant with bone graft group has insignificant crestal bone level reduction at 3rd and 6th months as compared to immediate implant without bone graft group. Delayed implant with bone graft group has insignificant crestal bone level reduction at 3rd and 6th months as compared to delayed implant without bone graft group. Conclusion: It was concluded from this study that clinical and radiographical bone healing in the delayed implant group with or without bone graft (Group Y) appears to be better than the immediate dental implant group with or without bone graft (Group X).
format	article
author	Gagandeep Singh Rajat Pareek Gaurav Singh Rajawat Aljeeta Kadam Mahmoud Al Abdulsalam Abdulrahman Al Abdulathim
author_facet	Gagandeep Singh Rajat Pareek Gaurav Singh Rajawat Aljeeta Kadam Mahmoud Al Abdulsalam Abdulrahman Al Abdulathim
author_sort	Gagandeep Singh
title	Comparison of bone healing in immediate implant placement versus delayed implant placement
title_short	Comparison of bone healing in immediate implant placement versus delayed implant placement
title_full	Comparison of bone healing in immediate implant placement versus delayed implant placement
title_fullStr	Comparison of bone healing in immediate implant placement versus delayed implant placement
title_full_unstemmed	Comparison of bone healing in immediate implant placement versus delayed implant placement
title_sort	comparison of bone healing in immediate implant placement versus delayed implant placement
publisher	Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/9f902455c1034206a23338c007b9f3a3
work_keys_str_mv	AT gagandeepsingh comparisonofbonehealinginimmediateimplantplacementversusdelayedimplantplacement AT rajatpareek comparisonofbonehealinginimmediateimplantplacementversusdelayedimplantplacement AT gauravsinghrajawat comparisonofbonehealinginimmediateimplantplacementversusdelayedimplantplacement AT aljeetakadam comparisonofbonehealinginimmediateimplantplacementversusdelayedimplantplacement AT mahmoudalabdulsalam comparisonofbonehealinginimmediateimplantplacementversusdelayedimplantplacement AT abdulrahmanalabdulathim comparisonofbonehealinginimmediateimplantplacementversusdelayedimplantplacement
_version_	1718420149929771008

Comparison of bone healing in immediate implant placement versus delayed implant placement

Ejemplares similares