Why strict drug laws work (and why they do not)

<!--StartFragment--> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; text-align: justify; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 13.0pt; font-family: Garamond;">Academic and scientific arguments in favour of the de-re...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Timothy A. Hickman
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Amsterdam Law Forum 2010
Materias:
Law
K
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/9fb88a6c39c445a99a212ae75d223a22
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:9fb88a6c39c445a99a212ae75d223a22
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:9fb88a6c39c445a99a212ae75d223a222021-12-02T00:36:30ZWhy strict drug laws work (and why they do not)1876-8156https://doaj.org/article/9fb88a6c39c445a99a212ae75d223a222010-10-01T00:00:00Zhttp://ojs.ubvu.vu.nl/alf/article/view/160https://doaj.org/toc/1876-8156<!--StartFragment--> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; text-align: justify; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 13.0pt; font-family: Garamond;">Academic and scientific arguments in favour of the de-regulation of illicit drugs are usually made on the basis of the greater harm done by the laws than by the drugs themselves. This article argues that such claims miss a key point. They forget that drug policy is made for people from wealthy countries who do not and are not likely to take drugs. As such, arguments based on failed treatment programmes or on large-scale, organised drug crime often fall on the deaf ears of those who believe that strict drug laws help to keep them, and especially their children, off drugs. Advocates of drug de-regulation must take the interests and beliefs of this voting majority seriously if they wish to persuade politicians to ease their ‘war on drugs’.</span></p> <!--EndFragment-->Timothy A. HickmanAmsterdam Law ForumarticleLawKENAmsterdam Law Forum, Vol 2, Iss 4 (2010)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Law
K
spellingShingle Law
K
Timothy A. Hickman
Why strict drug laws work (and why they do not)
description <!--StartFragment--> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; text-align: justify; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 13.0pt; font-family: Garamond;">Academic and scientific arguments in favour of the de-regulation of illicit drugs are usually made on the basis of the greater harm done by the laws than by the drugs themselves. This article argues that such claims miss a key point. They forget that drug policy is made for people from wealthy countries who do not and are not likely to take drugs. As such, arguments based on failed treatment programmes or on large-scale, organised drug crime often fall on the deaf ears of those who believe that strict drug laws help to keep them, and especially their children, off drugs. Advocates of drug de-regulation must take the interests and beliefs of this voting majority seriously if they wish to persuade politicians to ease their ‘war on drugs’.</span></p> <!--EndFragment-->
format article
author Timothy A. Hickman
author_facet Timothy A. Hickman
author_sort Timothy A. Hickman
title Why strict drug laws work (and why they do not)
title_short Why strict drug laws work (and why they do not)
title_full Why strict drug laws work (and why they do not)
title_fullStr Why strict drug laws work (and why they do not)
title_full_unstemmed Why strict drug laws work (and why they do not)
title_sort why strict drug laws work (and why they do not)
publisher Amsterdam Law Forum
publishDate 2010
url https://doaj.org/article/9fb88a6c39c445a99a212ae75d223a22
work_keys_str_mv AT timothyahickman whystrictdruglawsworkandwhytheydonot
_version_ 1718403636020641792