Communities of practice: influences on pedagogical reasoning and action of nursing professors

Objective. To analyze how the practice shared in communities of teaching practice in public and private universities influences the pedagogical reasoning and action of nursing professors based on Wenger’s concepts of community, negotiation of meaning, and learning. Methods. Case study conducted wit...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jouhanna do Carmo Menegaz, Vânia Marli Schubert Backes, José Luis Medina Moya
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Universidad de Antioquia 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a013be83029c4e7086d417a8eced7173
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a013be83029c4e7086d417a8eced7173
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a013be83029c4e7086d417a8eced71732021-11-27T14:59:09ZCommunities of practice: influences on pedagogical reasoning and action of nursing professors2216-028010.17533/udea.iee.v36n2e02https://doaj.org/article/a013be83029c4e7086d417a8eced71732018-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/iee/article/view/333651https://doaj.org/toc/2216-0280Objective. To analyze how the practice shared in communities of teaching practice in public and private universities influences the pedagogical reasoning and action of nursing professors based on Wenger’s concepts of community, negotiation of meaning, and learning. Methods. Case study conducted with two professors teaching nursing in a public and a private university in Brazil. Data collection included triangulation of sources and was conducted from April 2014 to July 2015. Data were organized in ATLAS.ti and analyzed using the constant comparative method, which generated three meta-categories. Results. In both cases the program’s project is shared repertoire and grounds negotiation of meaning in the practice that takes place in the pedagogical reasoning and action phases but negotiation is different between communities and cases. Learning is either solitary or has the influence of at least one other member but does not occur on an institutional basis. Conclusion. Nursing schools could offer more than program’s project to the negotiation of meaning and improve learning on practice in their communities as police of teachers education to improve pedagogical reasoning.   How to cite this article: Menegaz  JC, Backes VMS, Medina JL. Communities of practice: influences on pedagogical reasoning and action of nursing professors. Invest. Educ. Enferm. 2018; 36(2):e02.Jouhanna do Carmo MenegazVânia Marli Schubert BackesJosé Luis Medina MoyaUniversidad de Antioquiaarticlehigher educationlearningschoolsnursingteacher trainingfacultynursing.NursingRT1-120ENInvestigación y Educación en Enfermería, Vol 36, Iss 2 (2018)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic higher education
learning
schools
nursing
teacher training
faculty
nursing.
Nursing
RT1-120
spellingShingle higher education
learning
schools
nursing
teacher training
faculty
nursing.
Nursing
RT1-120
Jouhanna do Carmo Menegaz
Vânia Marli Schubert Backes
José Luis Medina Moya
Communities of practice: influences on pedagogical reasoning and action of nursing professors
description Objective. To analyze how the practice shared in communities of teaching practice in public and private universities influences the pedagogical reasoning and action of nursing professors based on Wenger’s concepts of community, negotiation of meaning, and learning. Methods. Case study conducted with two professors teaching nursing in a public and a private university in Brazil. Data collection included triangulation of sources and was conducted from April 2014 to July 2015. Data were organized in ATLAS.ti and analyzed using the constant comparative method, which generated three meta-categories. Results. In both cases the program’s project is shared repertoire and grounds negotiation of meaning in the practice that takes place in the pedagogical reasoning and action phases but negotiation is different between communities and cases. Learning is either solitary or has the influence of at least one other member but does not occur on an institutional basis. Conclusion. Nursing schools could offer more than program’s project to the negotiation of meaning and improve learning on practice in their communities as police of teachers education to improve pedagogical reasoning.   How to cite this article: Menegaz  JC, Backes VMS, Medina JL. Communities of practice: influences on pedagogical reasoning and action of nursing professors. Invest. Educ. Enferm. 2018; 36(2):e02.
format article
author Jouhanna do Carmo Menegaz
Vânia Marli Schubert Backes
José Luis Medina Moya
author_facet Jouhanna do Carmo Menegaz
Vânia Marli Schubert Backes
José Luis Medina Moya
author_sort Jouhanna do Carmo Menegaz
title Communities of practice: influences on pedagogical reasoning and action of nursing professors
title_short Communities of practice: influences on pedagogical reasoning and action of nursing professors
title_full Communities of practice: influences on pedagogical reasoning and action of nursing professors
title_fullStr Communities of practice: influences on pedagogical reasoning and action of nursing professors
title_full_unstemmed Communities of practice: influences on pedagogical reasoning and action of nursing professors
title_sort communities of practice: influences on pedagogical reasoning and action of nursing professors
publisher Universidad de Antioquia
publishDate 2018
url https://doaj.org/article/a013be83029c4e7086d417a8eced7173
work_keys_str_mv AT jouhannadocarmomenegaz communitiesofpracticeinfluencesonpedagogicalreasoningandactionofnursingprofessors
AT vaniamarlischubertbackes communitiesofpracticeinfluencesonpedagogicalreasoningandactionofnursingprofessors
AT joseluismedinamoya communitiesofpracticeinfluencesonpedagogicalreasoningandactionofnursingprofessors
_version_ 1718408520524627968