Communities of practice: influences on pedagogical reasoning and action of nursing professors
Objective. To analyze how the practice shared in communities of teaching practice in public and private universities influences the pedagogical reasoning and action of nursing professors based on Wenger’s concepts of community, negotiation of meaning, and learning. Methods. Case study conducted wit...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Universidad de Antioquia
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/a013be83029c4e7086d417a8eced7173 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:a013be83029c4e7086d417a8eced7173 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:a013be83029c4e7086d417a8eced71732021-11-27T14:59:09ZCommunities of practice: influences on pedagogical reasoning and action of nursing professors2216-028010.17533/udea.iee.v36n2e02https://doaj.org/article/a013be83029c4e7086d417a8eced71732018-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/iee/article/view/333651https://doaj.org/toc/2216-0280Objective. To analyze how the practice shared in communities of teaching practice in public and private universities influences the pedagogical reasoning and action of nursing professors based on Wenger’s concepts of community, negotiation of meaning, and learning. Methods. Case study conducted with two professors teaching nursing in a public and a private university in Brazil. Data collection included triangulation of sources and was conducted from April 2014 to July 2015. Data were organized in ATLAS.ti and analyzed using the constant comparative method, which generated three meta-categories. Results. In both cases the program’s project is shared repertoire and grounds negotiation of meaning in the practice that takes place in the pedagogical reasoning and action phases but negotiation is different between communities and cases. Learning is either solitary or has the influence of at least one other member but does not occur on an institutional basis. Conclusion. Nursing schools could offer more than program’s project to the negotiation of meaning and improve learning on practice in their communities as police of teachers education to improve pedagogical reasoning. How to cite this article: Menegaz JC, Backes VMS, Medina JL. Communities of practice: influences on pedagogical reasoning and action of nursing professors. Invest. Educ. Enferm. 2018; 36(2):e02.Jouhanna do Carmo MenegazVânia Marli Schubert BackesJosé Luis Medina MoyaUniversidad de Antioquiaarticlehigher educationlearningschoolsnursingteacher trainingfacultynursing.NursingRT1-120ENInvestigación y Educación en Enfermería, Vol 36, Iss 2 (2018) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
higher education learning schools nursing teacher training faculty nursing. Nursing RT1-120 |
spellingShingle |
higher education learning schools nursing teacher training faculty nursing. Nursing RT1-120 Jouhanna do Carmo Menegaz Vânia Marli Schubert Backes José Luis Medina Moya Communities of practice: influences on pedagogical reasoning and action of nursing professors |
description |
Objective. To analyze how the practice shared in communities of teaching practice in public and private universities influences the pedagogical reasoning and action of nursing professors based on Wenger’s concepts of community, negotiation of meaning, and learning.
Methods. Case study conducted with two professors teaching nursing in a public and a private university in Brazil. Data collection included triangulation of sources and was conducted from April 2014 to July 2015. Data were organized in ATLAS.ti and analyzed using the constant comparative method, which generated three meta-categories.
Results. In both cases the program’s project is shared repertoire and grounds negotiation of meaning in the practice that takes place in the pedagogical reasoning and action phases but negotiation is different between communities and cases. Learning is either solitary or has the influence of at least one other member but does not occur on an institutional basis.
Conclusion. Nursing schools could offer more than program’s project to the negotiation of meaning and improve learning on practice in their communities as police of teachers education to improve pedagogical reasoning.
How to cite this article: Menegaz JC, Backes VMS, Medina JL. Communities of practice: influences on pedagogical reasoning and action of nursing professors. Invest. Educ. Enferm. 2018; 36(2):e02. |
format |
article |
author |
Jouhanna do Carmo Menegaz Vânia Marli Schubert Backes José Luis Medina Moya |
author_facet |
Jouhanna do Carmo Menegaz Vânia Marli Schubert Backes José Luis Medina Moya |
author_sort |
Jouhanna do Carmo Menegaz |
title |
Communities of practice: influences on pedagogical reasoning and action of nursing professors |
title_short |
Communities of practice: influences on pedagogical reasoning and action of nursing professors |
title_full |
Communities of practice: influences on pedagogical reasoning and action of nursing professors |
title_fullStr |
Communities of practice: influences on pedagogical reasoning and action of nursing professors |
title_full_unstemmed |
Communities of practice: influences on pedagogical reasoning and action of nursing professors |
title_sort |
communities of practice: influences on pedagogical reasoning and action of nursing professors |
publisher |
Universidad de Antioquia |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/a013be83029c4e7086d417a8eced7173 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jouhannadocarmomenegaz communitiesofpracticeinfluencesonpedagogicalreasoningandactionofnursingprofessors AT vaniamarlischubertbackes communitiesofpracticeinfluencesonpedagogicalreasoningandactionofnursingprofessors AT joseluismedinamoya communitiesofpracticeinfluencesonpedagogicalreasoningandactionofnursingprofessors |
_version_ |
1718408520524627968 |