Pinhole does not increase screening accuracy of detecting decreased best corrected visual acuity in schoolchildren

Abstract Background Decreased best corrected visual acuity among children should be treated early in life, and vision screening in schoolchildren is an efficient and feasible selection for developing countries. Thus, the screening accuracy of different visual acuity tests is the key point for making...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weiwei Chen, Jing Fu, Ali Sun, Lei Li, Yunyun Sun, Zhaojun Meng
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a03246d2e16046cd8a49c708e7422e89
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a03246d2e16046cd8a49c708e7422e89
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a03246d2e16046cd8a49c708e7422e892021-12-05T12:26:37ZPinhole does not increase screening accuracy of detecting decreased best corrected visual acuity in schoolchildren10.1186/s12886-021-02150-81471-2415https://doaj.org/article/a03246d2e16046cd8a49c708e7422e892021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-02150-8https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2415Abstract Background Decreased best corrected visual acuity among children should be treated early in life, and vision screening in schoolchildren is an efficient and feasible selection for developing countries. Thus, the screening accuracy of different visual acuity tests is the key point for making vision screening strategies. The present study aims to explore the screening accuracy of uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and pin-hole corrected visual acuity (PCVA) using different vision chart in the detection of decreased best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) among schoolchildren. Methods Grade one primary schoolchildren in urban Lhasa with data of UCVA using tumbling E chart (UCVAE), PCVA using tumbling E chart (PCVAE), UCVA using Lea Symbols chart (UCVAL), PCVA using Lea Symbols chart (PCVAL) and BCVA using Lea Symbols chart were reviewed. Decreased BCVA was defined as BCVA≤20/32(≥0.2 logMAR). Difference, reliability, and diagnostic parameters in the detection of decreased BCVA of different visual acuity results were analyzed. Results Overall, 1672 children aged 6.58 ± 0.44 years fulfilling the criteria. The prevalence of decreased BCVA was 6.8%. Although no significant differences were found between UCVAE vs UCVAL (p = .84, paired t-test) as well as PCVAE vs PCVAL (p = .24), the ICC between them was low (0.68 and 0.57, respectively). The average difference between BCVA and UCVAE, UCVAL, PCVAE, PCVAL was logMAR -0.08 (− 0.37, 0.21), − 0.08 (− 0.29, 0.17), − 0.05 (− 0.30, 0.19), − 0.06 (− 0.23, 0.12) using Bland–Altman method. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of UCVAE, PCVAE, UCVAL, PCVAL for the detection of decreased BCVA was 0.78 (0.73, 0.84), 0.76 (0.71, 0.82), 0.95 (0.94, 0.96), 0.93 (0.91, 0.95), respectively. Conclusion Pinhole does not increase the screening accuracy of detecting decreased BCVA in grade one primary schoolchildren. Visual acuity test using Lea Symbols is more efficient than Tumbling E in the screening of that age. Trial registration Data were maily from the Lhasa Childhood Eye Study which has finished the clinical registration on ( ChiCTR1900026693 ).Weiwei ChenJing FuAli SunLei LiYunyun SunZhaojun MengBMCarticleSensitivitySpecificityDecreased best-corrected visual acuityVision screeningSchoolchildrenOphthalmologyRE1-994ENBMC Ophthalmology, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Sensitivity
Specificity
Decreased best-corrected visual acuity
Vision screening
Schoolchildren
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle Sensitivity
Specificity
Decreased best-corrected visual acuity
Vision screening
Schoolchildren
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Weiwei Chen
Jing Fu
Ali Sun
Lei Li
Yunyun Sun
Zhaojun Meng
Pinhole does not increase screening accuracy of detecting decreased best corrected visual acuity in schoolchildren
description Abstract Background Decreased best corrected visual acuity among children should be treated early in life, and vision screening in schoolchildren is an efficient and feasible selection for developing countries. Thus, the screening accuracy of different visual acuity tests is the key point for making vision screening strategies. The present study aims to explore the screening accuracy of uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and pin-hole corrected visual acuity (PCVA) using different vision chart in the detection of decreased best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) among schoolchildren. Methods Grade one primary schoolchildren in urban Lhasa with data of UCVA using tumbling E chart (UCVAE), PCVA using tumbling E chart (PCVAE), UCVA using Lea Symbols chart (UCVAL), PCVA using Lea Symbols chart (PCVAL) and BCVA using Lea Symbols chart were reviewed. Decreased BCVA was defined as BCVA≤20/32(≥0.2 logMAR). Difference, reliability, and diagnostic parameters in the detection of decreased BCVA of different visual acuity results were analyzed. Results Overall, 1672 children aged 6.58 ± 0.44 years fulfilling the criteria. The prevalence of decreased BCVA was 6.8%. Although no significant differences were found between UCVAE vs UCVAL (p = .84, paired t-test) as well as PCVAE vs PCVAL (p = .24), the ICC between them was low (0.68 and 0.57, respectively). The average difference between BCVA and UCVAE, UCVAL, PCVAE, PCVAL was logMAR -0.08 (− 0.37, 0.21), − 0.08 (− 0.29, 0.17), − 0.05 (− 0.30, 0.19), − 0.06 (− 0.23, 0.12) using Bland–Altman method. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of UCVAE, PCVAE, UCVAL, PCVAL for the detection of decreased BCVA was 0.78 (0.73, 0.84), 0.76 (0.71, 0.82), 0.95 (0.94, 0.96), 0.93 (0.91, 0.95), respectively. Conclusion Pinhole does not increase the screening accuracy of detecting decreased BCVA in grade one primary schoolchildren. Visual acuity test using Lea Symbols is more efficient than Tumbling E in the screening of that age. Trial registration Data were maily from the Lhasa Childhood Eye Study which has finished the clinical registration on ( ChiCTR1900026693 ).
format article
author Weiwei Chen
Jing Fu
Ali Sun
Lei Li
Yunyun Sun
Zhaojun Meng
author_facet Weiwei Chen
Jing Fu
Ali Sun
Lei Li
Yunyun Sun
Zhaojun Meng
author_sort Weiwei Chen
title Pinhole does not increase screening accuracy of detecting decreased best corrected visual acuity in schoolchildren
title_short Pinhole does not increase screening accuracy of detecting decreased best corrected visual acuity in schoolchildren
title_full Pinhole does not increase screening accuracy of detecting decreased best corrected visual acuity in schoolchildren
title_fullStr Pinhole does not increase screening accuracy of detecting decreased best corrected visual acuity in schoolchildren
title_full_unstemmed Pinhole does not increase screening accuracy of detecting decreased best corrected visual acuity in schoolchildren
title_sort pinhole does not increase screening accuracy of detecting decreased best corrected visual acuity in schoolchildren
publisher BMC
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/a03246d2e16046cd8a49c708e7422e89
work_keys_str_mv AT weiweichen pinholedoesnotincreasescreeningaccuracyofdetectingdecreasedbestcorrectedvisualacuityinschoolchildren
AT jingfu pinholedoesnotincreasescreeningaccuracyofdetectingdecreasedbestcorrectedvisualacuityinschoolchildren
AT alisun pinholedoesnotincreasescreeningaccuracyofdetectingdecreasedbestcorrectedvisualacuityinschoolchildren
AT leili pinholedoesnotincreasescreeningaccuracyofdetectingdecreasedbestcorrectedvisualacuityinschoolchildren
AT yunyunsun pinholedoesnotincreasescreeningaccuracyofdetectingdecreasedbestcorrectedvisualacuityinschoolchildren
AT zhaojunmeng pinholedoesnotincreasescreeningaccuracyofdetectingdecreasedbestcorrectedvisualacuityinschoolchildren
_version_ 1718371916490735616