Sociologies of literature and uses of Bourdieu in Argentina: Three recent approximations (Szpilbarg, Seccia y Vanoli)

I briefly recapitulate the reception of Pierre Bourdieu’s works in Argentina, especially from literary studies, through the contributions of Carlos Altamirano and Beatriz Sarlo. Then, I consider three recent uses of the French sociologist’s legacy in books published in 2019 by three sociologists: Ca...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hernán Maltz
Formato: article
Lenguaje:ES
Publicado: Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a037dfff9416484d8626f330084f8fd2
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a037dfff9416484d8626f330084f8fd2
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a037dfff9416484d8626f330084f8fd22021-11-08T14:14:07ZSociologies of literature and uses of Bourdieu in Argentina: Three recent approximations (Szpilbarg, Seccia y Vanoli)2313-9676https://doaj.org/article/a037dfff9416484d8626f330084f8fd22021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://fh.mdp.edu.ar/revistas/index.php/etl/article/view/4436https://doaj.org/toc/2313-9676I briefly recapitulate the reception of Pierre Bourdieu’s works in Argentina, especially from literary studies, through the contributions of Carlos Altamirano and Beatriz Sarlo. Then, I consider three recent uses of the French sociologist’s legacy in books published in 2019 by three sociologists: Cartografía argentina de la edición mundializada: modos de hacer y pensar el libro en el siglo XXI (2019) by Daniela Szpilbarg, ¿Clase media? Ensayos de literatura y sociedad desde Gino Germani a la Nueva narrativa argentina (2019) by Oriana Seccia, and El amor por la literatura en tiempos de algoritmos: 11 hipótesis para discutir con escritores, editores, lectores, gestores y demás militantes (2019) by Hernán Vanoli. I describe a simple classification of uses: one of acceptance and axiomatic use; another of active rejection; and a third one of critical reformulation. Without making a conclusion that prioritizes some uses over others, I tend to value positively the distanced use. I conclude the text with the identification of two tensions derived from Bourdieu’s uses (in particular, in the domains of the sociology of literature, but, in general, in the social and humanistic disciplines).Hernán MaltzUniversidad Nacional de Mar del Plataarticlesociología de la literaturateoría sociológicaestudios literariosargentinapierre bourdieuLatin America. Spanish AmericaF1201-3799French literature - Italian literature - Spanish literature - Portuguese literaturePQ1-3999ESEstudios de Teoría Literaria, Vol 10, Iss 23, Pp 168-180 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language ES
topic sociología de la literatura
teoría sociológica
estudios literarios
argentina
pierre bourdieu
Latin America. Spanish America
F1201-3799
French literature - Italian literature - Spanish literature - Portuguese literature
PQ1-3999
spellingShingle sociología de la literatura
teoría sociológica
estudios literarios
argentina
pierre bourdieu
Latin America. Spanish America
F1201-3799
French literature - Italian literature - Spanish literature - Portuguese literature
PQ1-3999
Hernán Maltz
Sociologies of literature and uses of Bourdieu in Argentina: Three recent approximations (Szpilbarg, Seccia y Vanoli)
description I briefly recapitulate the reception of Pierre Bourdieu’s works in Argentina, especially from literary studies, through the contributions of Carlos Altamirano and Beatriz Sarlo. Then, I consider three recent uses of the French sociologist’s legacy in books published in 2019 by three sociologists: Cartografía argentina de la edición mundializada: modos de hacer y pensar el libro en el siglo XXI (2019) by Daniela Szpilbarg, ¿Clase media? Ensayos de literatura y sociedad desde Gino Germani a la Nueva narrativa argentina (2019) by Oriana Seccia, and El amor por la literatura en tiempos de algoritmos: 11 hipótesis para discutir con escritores, editores, lectores, gestores y demás militantes (2019) by Hernán Vanoli. I describe a simple classification of uses: one of acceptance and axiomatic use; another of active rejection; and a third one of critical reformulation. Without making a conclusion that prioritizes some uses over others, I tend to value positively the distanced use. I conclude the text with the identification of two tensions derived from Bourdieu’s uses (in particular, in the domains of the sociology of literature, but, in general, in the social and humanistic disciplines).
format article
author Hernán Maltz
author_facet Hernán Maltz
author_sort Hernán Maltz
title Sociologies of literature and uses of Bourdieu in Argentina: Three recent approximations (Szpilbarg, Seccia y Vanoli)
title_short Sociologies of literature and uses of Bourdieu in Argentina: Three recent approximations (Szpilbarg, Seccia y Vanoli)
title_full Sociologies of literature and uses of Bourdieu in Argentina: Three recent approximations (Szpilbarg, Seccia y Vanoli)
title_fullStr Sociologies of literature and uses of Bourdieu in Argentina: Three recent approximations (Szpilbarg, Seccia y Vanoli)
title_full_unstemmed Sociologies of literature and uses of Bourdieu in Argentina: Three recent approximations (Szpilbarg, Seccia y Vanoli)
title_sort sociologies of literature and uses of bourdieu in argentina: three recent approximations (szpilbarg, seccia y vanoli)
publisher Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/a037dfff9416484d8626f330084f8fd2
work_keys_str_mv AT hernanmaltz sociologiesofliteratureandusesofbourdieuinargentinathreerecentapproximationsszpilbargsecciayvanoli
_version_ 1718442266323845120