Neuroplastic effects of end-effector robotic gait training for hemiparetic stroke: a randomised controlled trial

Abstract Detecting neuroplastic changes during locomotor neurorehabilitation is crucial for independent primal motor behaviours. However, long-term locomotor training-related neuroplasticity remains unexplored. We compared the effects of end-effector robot-assisted gait training (E-RAGT) and bodywei...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hayeon Kim, Gyulee Park, Joon-Ho Shin, Joshua H. You
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2020
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a142a7b0432442b8a41b6bb6f4d3d9f8
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a142a7b0432442b8a41b6bb6f4d3d9f8
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a142a7b0432442b8a41b6bb6f4d3d9f82021-12-02T16:06:40ZNeuroplastic effects of end-effector robotic gait training for hemiparetic stroke: a randomised controlled trial10.1038/s41598-020-69367-32045-2322https://doaj.org/article/a142a7b0432442b8a41b6bb6f4d3d9f82020-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69367-3https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Detecting neuroplastic changes during locomotor neurorehabilitation is crucial for independent primal motor behaviours. However, long-term locomotor training-related neuroplasticity remains unexplored. We compared the effects of end-effector robot-assisted gait training (E-RAGT) and bodyweight-supported treadmill training (BWST) on cortical activation in individuals with hemiparetic stroke. Twenty-three men and five women aged 53.2 ± 11.2 years were recruited and randomly assigned to participate in E-RAGT (n = 14) or BWST (n = 14) for 30 min/day, 5 days/week, for 4 weeks. Cortical activity, lower limb motor function, and gait speed were evaluated before and after training. Activation of the primary sensorimotor cortex, supplementary motor area, and premotor cortex in the affected hemisphere significantly increased only in the E-RAGT group, although there were no significant between-group differences. Clinical outcomes, including the Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA), timed up and go test, and 10-m walk test scores, improved after training in both groups, with significantly better FMA scores in the E-RAGT group than in the BWST group. These findings suggest that E-RAGT effectively improves neuroplastic outcomes in hemiparetic stroke, although its superiority over conventional training remains unclear. This may have clinical implications and provides insight for clinicians interested in locomotor neurorehabilitation after hemiparetic stroke. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04054739 (12/08/2019).Hayeon KimGyulee ParkJoon-Ho ShinJoshua H. YouNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Hayeon Kim
Gyulee Park
Joon-Ho Shin
Joshua H. You
Neuroplastic effects of end-effector robotic gait training for hemiparetic stroke: a randomised controlled trial
description Abstract Detecting neuroplastic changes during locomotor neurorehabilitation is crucial for independent primal motor behaviours. However, long-term locomotor training-related neuroplasticity remains unexplored. We compared the effects of end-effector robot-assisted gait training (E-RAGT) and bodyweight-supported treadmill training (BWST) on cortical activation in individuals with hemiparetic stroke. Twenty-three men and five women aged 53.2 ± 11.2 years were recruited and randomly assigned to participate in E-RAGT (n = 14) or BWST (n = 14) for 30 min/day, 5 days/week, for 4 weeks. Cortical activity, lower limb motor function, and gait speed were evaluated before and after training. Activation of the primary sensorimotor cortex, supplementary motor area, and premotor cortex in the affected hemisphere significantly increased only in the E-RAGT group, although there were no significant between-group differences. Clinical outcomes, including the Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA), timed up and go test, and 10-m walk test scores, improved after training in both groups, with significantly better FMA scores in the E-RAGT group than in the BWST group. These findings suggest that E-RAGT effectively improves neuroplastic outcomes in hemiparetic stroke, although its superiority over conventional training remains unclear. This may have clinical implications and provides insight for clinicians interested in locomotor neurorehabilitation after hemiparetic stroke. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04054739 (12/08/2019).
format article
author Hayeon Kim
Gyulee Park
Joon-Ho Shin
Joshua H. You
author_facet Hayeon Kim
Gyulee Park
Joon-Ho Shin
Joshua H. You
author_sort Hayeon Kim
title Neuroplastic effects of end-effector robotic gait training for hemiparetic stroke: a randomised controlled trial
title_short Neuroplastic effects of end-effector robotic gait training for hemiparetic stroke: a randomised controlled trial
title_full Neuroplastic effects of end-effector robotic gait training for hemiparetic stroke: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Neuroplastic effects of end-effector robotic gait training for hemiparetic stroke: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Neuroplastic effects of end-effector robotic gait training for hemiparetic stroke: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort neuroplastic effects of end-effector robotic gait training for hemiparetic stroke: a randomised controlled trial
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/a142a7b0432442b8a41b6bb6f4d3d9f8
work_keys_str_mv AT hayeonkim neuroplasticeffectsofendeffectorroboticgaittrainingforhemipareticstrokearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gyuleepark neuroplasticeffectsofendeffectorroboticgaittrainingforhemipareticstrokearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT joonhoshin neuroplasticeffectsofendeffectorroboticgaittrainingforhemipareticstrokearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT joshuahyou neuroplasticeffectsofendeffectorroboticgaittrainingforhemipareticstrokearandomisedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1718384920505614336