Validation of a lifestyle-based risk score for type 2 diabetes mellitus in Australian adults

The study aimed to assess the performance of a lifestyle-based prognostic risk model (Diabetes Lifestyle Score) for the prediction of 5-year risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The model comprises nine self-reported predictors (sex, age, antihypertensive drugs, body mass index, family history of diabe...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vera Helen Buss, Marlien Varnfield, Mark Harris, Margo Barr
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a15830678f0442be82373ea076531989
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a15830678f0442be82373ea076531989
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a15830678f0442be82373ea0765319892021-11-22T04:24:26ZValidation of a lifestyle-based risk score for type 2 diabetes mellitus in Australian adults2211-335510.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101647https://doaj.org/article/a15830678f0442be82373ea0765319892021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335521003387https://doaj.org/toc/2211-3355The study aimed to assess the performance of a lifestyle-based prognostic risk model (Diabetes Lifestyle Score) for the prediction of 5-year risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The model comprises nine self-reported predictors (sex, age, antihypertensive drugs, body mass index, family history of diabetes, physical activity, fruits, vegetables, and wholemeal/brown bread). We conducted an external validation and update of the model in an Australian cohort including 97,615 residents of New South Wales aged 45 years and older who were free of type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus at baseline. Of all participants, 4,741 developed type 2 diabetes mellitus over 5 years. We conducted the statistical analyses in RStudio using the programming language R. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the original model was 0.726 (95% confidence interval: 0.719, 0.733). After adjusting the calibration intercept and slope, the original model performed reasonably well in the external cohort. The best performance was measured by using the numerical predictors as continuous variables and refitting all coefficients (AUC: 0.741, 95% confidence interval: 0.734, 0.748). The results of the original model after calibration were comparable to those received from the AUSDRISK score which is routinely used in Australian clinical practice. Hence, the lifestyle-based model might be a reasonable alternative for laypersons since the required information is most likely known by these. Further, the risk score may communicate the message about the importance of a healthy diet to reduce the risk of diabetes.Vera Helen BussMarlien VarnfieldMark HarrisMargo BarrElsevierarticleDiabetes mellitus, type 2Risk factor scoresLogistic regressionValidation studyCohort analysisMedicineRENPreventive Medicine Reports, Vol 24, Iss , Pp 101647- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Diabetes mellitus, type 2
Risk factor scores
Logistic regression
Validation study
Cohort analysis
Medicine
R
spellingShingle Diabetes mellitus, type 2
Risk factor scores
Logistic regression
Validation study
Cohort analysis
Medicine
R
Vera Helen Buss
Marlien Varnfield
Mark Harris
Margo Barr
Validation of a lifestyle-based risk score for type 2 diabetes mellitus in Australian adults
description The study aimed to assess the performance of a lifestyle-based prognostic risk model (Diabetes Lifestyle Score) for the prediction of 5-year risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The model comprises nine self-reported predictors (sex, age, antihypertensive drugs, body mass index, family history of diabetes, physical activity, fruits, vegetables, and wholemeal/brown bread). We conducted an external validation and update of the model in an Australian cohort including 97,615 residents of New South Wales aged 45 years and older who were free of type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus at baseline. Of all participants, 4,741 developed type 2 diabetes mellitus over 5 years. We conducted the statistical analyses in RStudio using the programming language R. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the original model was 0.726 (95% confidence interval: 0.719, 0.733). After adjusting the calibration intercept and slope, the original model performed reasonably well in the external cohort. The best performance was measured by using the numerical predictors as continuous variables and refitting all coefficients (AUC: 0.741, 95% confidence interval: 0.734, 0.748). The results of the original model after calibration were comparable to those received from the AUSDRISK score which is routinely used in Australian clinical practice. Hence, the lifestyle-based model might be a reasonable alternative for laypersons since the required information is most likely known by these. Further, the risk score may communicate the message about the importance of a healthy diet to reduce the risk of diabetes.
format article
author Vera Helen Buss
Marlien Varnfield
Mark Harris
Margo Barr
author_facet Vera Helen Buss
Marlien Varnfield
Mark Harris
Margo Barr
author_sort Vera Helen Buss
title Validation of a lifestyle-based risk score for type 2 diabetes mellitus in Australian adults
title_short Validation of a lifestyle-based risk score for type 2 diabetes mellitus in Australian adults
title_full Validation of a lifestyle-based risk score for type 2 diabetes mellitus in Australian adults
title_fullStr Validation of a lifestyle-based risk score for type 2 diabetes mellitus in Australian adults
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a lifestyle-based risk score for type 2 diabetes mellitus in Australian adults
title_sort validation of a lifestyle-based risk score for type 2 diabetes mellitus in australian adults
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/a15830678f0442be82373ea076531989
work_keys_str_mv AT verahelenbuss validationofalifestylebasedriskscorefortype2diabetesmellitusinaustralianadults
AT marlienvarnfield validationofalifestylebasedriskscorefortype2diabetesmellitusinaustralianadults
AT markharris validationofalifestylebasedriskscorefortype2diabetesmellitusinaustralianadults
AT margobarr validationofalifestylebasedriskscorefortype2diabetesmellitusinaustralianadults
_version_ 1718418239953829888