EU Electricity Policymakers’ (in) Sensitivity to External Factors: A Multi-decade Quantitative Analysis

<p>The article explores a possible reason for the consistent dominance in the EU energy space of one energy policy priority, environment, when a more balanced policy would be expected, according to the classical energy trilemma. Stemming from a policy dynamics theoretical background, the sensi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Mircea (Mike) Bostan
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: EconJournals 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a1804a8f7aa94c1e99ff97d324296ad0
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a1804a8f7aa94c1e99ff97d324296ad0
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a1804a8f7aa94c1e99ff97d324296ad02021-11-12T07:27:31ZEU Electricity Policymakers’ (in) Sensitivity to External Factors: A Multi-decade Quantitative Analysis2146-4553https://doaj.org/article/a1804a8f7aa94c1e99ff97d324296ad02021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/11630https://doaj.org/toc/2146-4553<p>The article explores a possible reason for the consistent dominance in the EU energy space of one energy policy priority, environment, when a more balanced policy would be expected, according to the classical energy trilemma. Stemming from a policy dynamics theoretical background, the sensitivity of EU policymakers to external factors is quantitatively tested by comparing legislative output against key relevant indicators, such as the public opinion and air pollutants emissions. The study encapsulates the last three decades, across all the three energy pillars of the energy trilemma, plus a fourth, internal energy market. The investigation converts into ordinal values data from selected indicators so as to create comparable scales. Results show that, unlike other energy pillars, which display strong connections between external factors and legislative output, environment legislation is rather indifferent to external factors pressure. Possible explanations are incorrect policy calibration or internal factors, originating in the rational choice realm. This research is one of the first to introduce comparative assessments in the Environmental Policy Integration discussion and employs in novel ways research methods for energy policy analysis emerged in the field of energy security policies.</p><p><strong>Keywords:</strong> electricity policy; policy dynamics; quantitative analysis; classical energy trilemma</p><p><strong>JEL Classifications:</strong> F530; Q480</p><p>DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.11630">https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.11630</a></p>Mircea (Mike) BostanEconJournalsarticleEnvironmental sciencesGE1-350Energy industries. Energy policy. Fuel tradeHD9502-9502.5ENInternational Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Vol 11, Iss 6, Pp 303-314 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Energy industries. Energy policy. Fuel trade
HD9502-9502.5
spellingShingle Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Energy industries. Energy policy. Fuel trade
HD9502-9502.5
Mircea (Mike) Bostan
EU Electricity Policymakers’ (in) Sensitivity to External Factors: A Multi-decade Quantitative Analysis
description <p>The article explores a possible reason for the consistent dominance in the EU energy space of one energy policy priority, environment, when a more balanced policy would be expected, according to the classical energy trilemma. Stemming from a policy dynamics theoretical background, the sensitivity of EU policymakers to external factors is quantitatively tested by comparing legislative output against key relevant indicators, such as the public opinion and air pollutants emissions. The study encapsulates the last three decades, across all the three energy pillars of the energy trilemma, plus a fourth, internal energy market. The investigation converts into ordinal values data from selected indicators so as to create comparable scales. Results show that, unlike other energy pillars, which display strong connections between external factors and legislative output, environment legislation is rather indifferent to external factors pressure. Possible explanations are incorrect policy calibration or internal factors, originating in the rational choice realm. This research is one of the first to introduce comparative assessments in the Environmental Policy Integration discussion and employs in novel ways research methods for energy policy analysis emerged in the field of energy security policies.</p><p><strong>Keywords:</strong> electricity policy; policy dynamics; quantitative analysis; classical energy trilemma</p><p><strong>JEL Classifications:</strong> F530; Q480</p><p>DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.11630">https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.11630</a></p>
format article
author Mircea (Mike) Bostan
author_facet Mircea (Mike) Bostan
author_sort Mircea (Mike) Bostan
title EU Electricity Policymakers’ (in) Sensitivity to External Factors: A Multi-decade Quantitative Analysis
title_short EU Electricity Policymakers’ (in) Sensitivity to External Factors: A Multi-decade Quantitative Analysis
title_full EU Electricity Policymakers’ (in) Sensitivity to External Factors: A Multi-decade Quantitative Analysis
title_fullStr EU Electricity Policymakers’ (in) Sensitivity to External Factors: A Multi-decade Quantitative Analysis
title_full_unstemmed EU Electricity Policymakers’ (in) Sensitivity to External Factors: A Multi-decade Quantitative Analysis
title_sort eu electricity policymakers’ (in) sensitivity to external factors: a multi-decade quantitative analysis
publisher EconJournals
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/a1804a8f7aa94c1e99ff97d324296ad0
work_keys_str_mv AT mirceamikebostan euelectricitypolicymakersinsensitivitytoexternalfactorsamultidecadequantitativeanalysis
_version_ 1718431126472622080