Post-colonial options in media conversations

For those of you who might who might be intersted in re-conceptulising the way in which New Zealand might become Aotearoa, one of the ongoing frustrations is the limitations of the media in relation to post-colonial discussions. The 1980s were characterised by a contradictory set of changes in the...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Paul Spoonley
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Asia Pacific Network 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a1960c068c004e528ebe7812d663ed64
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a1960c068c004e528ebe7812d663ed64
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a1960c068c004e528ebe7812d663ed642021-12-02T10:24:51ZPost-colonial options in media conversations10.24135/pjr.v11i1.8251023-94992324-2035https://doaj.org/article/a1960c068c004e528ebe7812d663ed642005-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/825https://doaj.org/toc/1023-9499https://doaj.org/toc/2324-2035 For those of you who might who might be intersted in re-conceptulising the way in which New Zealand might become Aotearoa, one of the ongoing frustrations is the limitations of the media in relation to post-colonial discussions. The 1980s were characterised by a contradictory set of changes in the remaking of New Zealand. The conservation of econmoic deregulation and re-regulation was accompagnied by a significant re-ordering of identity. A particularly significant debate concerned national and indigenous identity and an emergent post-colonialism, or in During (1985) terms, coming to know New Zealand in our terms, not those which originated with a colonial power. Paul SpoonleyAsia Pacific Networkarticleindigenousindigenous public sphereculturecultural diversityidentity politicsIndigeneityCommunication. Mass mediaP87-96Journalism. The periodical press, etc.PN4699-5650ENPacific Journalism Review, Vol 11, Iss 1 (2005)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic indigenous
indigenous public sphere
culture
cultural diversity
identity politics
Indigeneity
Communication. Mass media
P87-96
Journalism. The periodical press, etc.
PN4699-5650
spellingShingle indigenous
indigenous public sphere
culture
cultural diversity
identity politics
Indigeneity
Communication. Mass media
P87-96
Journalism. The periodical press, etc.
PN4699-5650
Paul Spoonley
Post-colonial options in media conversations
description For those of you who might who might be intersted in re-conceptulising the way in which New Zealand might become Aotearoa, one of the ongoing frustrations is the limitations of the media in relation to post-colonial discussions. The 1980s were characterised by a contradictory set of changes in the remaking of New Zealand. The conservation of econmoic deregulation and re-regulation was accompagnied by a significant re-ordering of identity. A particularly significant debate concerned national and indigenous identity and an emergent post-colonialism, or in During (1985) terms, coming to know New Zealand in our terms, not those which originated with a colonial power.
format article
author Paul Spoonley
author_facet Paul Spoonley
author_sort Paul Spoonley
title Post-colonial options in media conversations
title_short Post-colonial options in media conversations
title_full Post-colonial options in media conversations
title_fullStr Post-colonial options in media conversations
title_full_unstemmed Post-colonial options in media conversations
title_sort post-colonial options in media conversations
publisher Asia Pacific Network
publishDate 2005
url https://doaj.org/article/a1960c068c004e528ebe7812d663ed64
work_keys_str_mv AT paulspoonley postcolonialoptionsinmediaconversations
_version_ 1718397307982970880