Post-colonial options in media conversations
For those of you who might who might be intersted in re-conceptulising the way in which New Zealand might become Aotearoa, one of the ongoing frustrations is the limitations of the media in relation to post-colonial discussions. The 1980s were characterised by a contradictory set of changes in the...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Asia Pacific Network
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/a1960c068c004e528ebe7812d663ed64 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:a1960c068c004e528ebe7812d663ed64 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:a1960c068c004e528ebe7812d663ed642021-12-02T10:24:51ZPost-colonial options in media conversations10.24135/pjr.v11i1.8251023-94992324-2035https://doaj.org/article/a1960c068c004e528ebe7812d663ed642005-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/825https://doaj.org/toc/1023-9499https://doaj.org/toc/2324-2035 For those of you who might who might be intersted in re-conceptulising the way in which New Zealand might become Aotearoa, one of the ongoing frustrations is the limitations of the media in relation to post-colonial discussions. The 1980s were characterised by a contradictory set of changes in the remaking of New Zealand. The conservation of econmoic deregulation and re-regulation was accompagnied by a significant re-ordering of identity. A particularly significant debate concerned national and indigenous identity and an emergent post-colonialism, or in During (1985) terms, coming to know New Zealand in our terms, not those which originated with a colonial power. Paul SpoonleyAsia Pacific Networkarticleindigenousindigenous public sphereculturecultural diversityidentity politicsIndigeneityCommunication. Mass mediaP87-96Journalism. The periodical press, etc.PN4699-5650ENPacific Journalism Review, Vol 11, Iss 1 (2005) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
indigenous indigenous public sphere culture cultural diversity identity politics Indigeneity Communication. Mass media P87-96 Journalism. The periodical press, etc. PN4699-5650 |
spellingShingle |
indigenous indigenous public sphere culture cultural diversity identity politics Indigeneity Communication. Mass media P87-96 Journalism. The periodical press, etc. PN4699-5650 Paul Spoonley Post-colonial options in media conversations |
description |
For those of you who might who might be intersted in re-conceptulising the way in which New Zealand might become Aotearoa, one of the ongoing frustrations is the limitations of the media in relation to post-colonial discussions. The 1980s were characterised by a contradictory set of changes in the remaking of New Zealand. The conservation of econmoic deregulation and re-regulation was accompagnied by a significant re-ordering of identity. A particularly significant debate concerned national and indigenous identity and an emergent post-colonialism, or in During (1985) terms, coming to know New Zealand in our terms, not those which originated with a colonial power.
|
format |
article |
author |
Paul Spoonley |
author_facet |
Paul Spoonley |
author_sort |
Paul Spoonley |
title |
Post-colonial options in media conversations |
title_short |
Post-colonial options in media conversations |
title_full |
Post-colonial options in media conversations |
title_fullStr |
Post-colonial options in media conversations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Post-colonial options in media conversations |
title_sort |
post-colonial options in media conversations |
publisher |
Asia Pacific Network |
publishDate |
2005 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/a1960c068c004e528ebe7812d663ed64 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT paulspoonley postcolonialoptionsinmediaconversations |
_version_ |
1718397307982970880 |