A Proposal for Improving the Essence Standard by Using Terminology Unification
Context: SEMAT (Software Engineering Method and Theory) is promoting a software engineering theory with adequate terminology to improve the transference of methods and practices between teams. Terminologies should be uniform in order to eliminate ambiguity, improve communication among teams, and sup...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | ES |
Publicado: |
Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/a19978186ea749f681f0d3998bb221fe |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:a19978186ea749f681f0d3998bb221fe |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:a19978186ea749f681f0d3998bb221fe2021-11-04T23:54:31ZA Proposal for Improving the Essence Standard by Using Terminology Unification0121-750X2344-839310.14483/23448393.16428https://doaj.org/article/a19978186ea749f681f0d3998bb221fe2021-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/reving/article/view/16428https://doaj.org/toc/0121-750Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2344-8393Context: SEMAT (Software Engineering Method and Theory) is promoting a software engineering theory with adequate terminology to improve the transference of methods and practices between teams. Terminologies should be uniform in order to eliminate ambiguity, improve communication among teams, and support new concepts. Method: The process of reaching uniformity is called terminology unification. In this paper we propose a method for improving the Essence standard based on terminology unification. This method comprises four stages: selection of base models and definitions for structuring terms, identification of terminology problems by comparing the base models and definitions, unification of terms among the base models and definitions, and measurement of the gap between the current standard terms and the proposed changes. Results: We propose a set of modifications to the Essence standard in constructs like: alpha state cards, relationships among alphas, and names of activity spaces. Conclusions: By solving such conflicts, we can define a common, unambiguous terminology for software engineering teams.Carlos Mario Zapata JaramilloAntony Henao RoquemeUniversidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldasarticleessence standarduniformity problemsterminology problemsterminology unificationEngineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040ESIngeniería , Vol 26, Iss 2, Pp 213-232 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
ES |
topic |
essence standard uniformity problems terminology problems terminology unification Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 |
spellingShingle |
essence standard uniformity problems terminology problems terminology unification Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Carlos Mario Zapata Jaramillo Antony Henao Roqueme A Proposal for Improving the Essence Standard by Using Terminology Unification |
description |
Context: SEMAT (Software Engineering Method and Theory) is promoting a software engineering theory with adequate terminology to improve the transference of methods and practices between teams. Terminologies should be uniform in order to eliminate ambiguity, improve communication among teams, and support new concepts.
Method: The process of reaching uniformity is called terminology unification. In this paper we propose a method for improving the Essence standard based on terminology unification. This method comprises four stages: selection of base models and definitions for structuring terms, identification of terminology problems by comparing the base models and definitions, unification of terms among the base models and definitions, and measurement of the gap between the current standard terms and the proposed changes.
Results: We propose a set of modifications to the Essence standard in constructs like: alpha state cards, relationships among alphas, and names of activity spaces.
Conclusions: By solving such conflicts, we can define a common, unambiguous terminology for software engineering teams. |
format |
article |
author |
Carlos Mario Zapata Jaramillo Antony Henao Roqueme |
author_facet |
Carlos Mario Zapata Jaramillo Antony Henao Roqueme |
author_sort |
Carlos Mario Zapata Jaramillo |
title |
A Proposal for Improving the Essence Standard by Using Terminology Unification |
title_short |
A Proposal for Improving the Essence Standard by Using Terminology Unification |
title_full |
A Proposal for Improving the Essence Standard by Using Terminology Unification |
title_fullStr |
A Proposal for Improving the Essence Standard by Using Terminology Unification |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Proposal for Improving the Essence Standard by Using Terminology Unification |
title_sort |
proposal for improving the essence standard by using terminology unification |
publisher |
Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/a19978186ea749f681f0d3998bb221fe |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT carlosmariozapatajaramillo aproposalforimprovingtheessencestandardbyusingterminologyunification AT antonyhenaoroqueme aproposalforimprovingtheessencestandardbyusingterminologyunification AT carlosmariozapatajaramillo proposalforimprovingtheessencestandardbyusingterminologyunification AT antonyhenaoroqueme proposalforimprovingtheessencestandardbyusingterminologyunification |
_version_ |
1718444545147928576 |