Understanding a population: A methodology for a population-based coastal safety survey.

Drowning is a global public health problem, but accurately estimating drowning risk remains a challenge. Coastal drowning comprises a significant proportion of the drowning burden in Australia and is influenced by a range of behavioural factors (e.g. risk perception, knowledge, attitudes and behavio...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jasmin C Lawes, Lea Uebelhoer, William Koon, Luke Strasiotto, Frederic Anne, Shane Daw, Robert W Brander, Nick Mulcahy, Amy E Peden
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a1b31183b7ff4ce0849df0d8eab4de2c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a1b31183b7ff4ce0849df0d8eab4de2c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a1b31183b7ff4ce0849df0d8eab4de2c2021-12-02T20:18:06ZUnderstanding a population: A methodology for a population-based coastal safety survey.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0256202https://doaj.org/article/a1b31183b7ff4ce0849df0d8eab4de2c2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256202https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Drowning is a global public health problem, but accurately estimating drowning risk remains a challenge. Coastal drowning comprises a significant proportion of the drowning burden in Australia and is influenced by a range of behavioural factors (e.g. risk perception, knowledge, attitudes and behaviours) that are poorly understood. These factors, along with those that impact exposure (e.g. coastal visitation and activity participation) all impact on drowning risk. While excellent mortality and morbidity data exists in Australia, a lack of coastal participation data presents challenges to identifying high-risk groups or activities and prioritising prevention efforts. This methods paper describes the development and evolution of an ongoing, annual, nationally representative online survey as an effective tool used to capture valuable data about the Australian population's relationship with the coast. This paper explores how the survey is structured (12-14 sections spanning multiple topics and themes), the different question types used (including open text, 4-digit responses and categorical questions), the sample size (1400-1600 respondents), sampling strategy (using demographic quota sampling which can then be post-weighted to the population if required) and how topics and themes have changed over time to enhance the quality of data collected (i.e., wording changes to enhance participant comprehension or data usability and changing issue-specific 'feature' topics of interest such as campaign evaluation). How the survey is implemented online is described, both practically through to third-party recruitment processes and ethically to maximise anonymity of respondents and ensure data quality. Interim analyses indicate the impact of considering exposure when calculating fatal drowning rates, especially by activity (e.g., crude boating drowning rate 0.12 per 100,000 population vs 0.95 per 100,000 exposed population [relative risk = 8.01; 95% confidence interval: 4.55-14.10]). This study highlights lessons learned in the process of conducting a nationally representative coastal participation survey as well as the strengths and limitations of adopting this approach. Data collected will provide more detailed information on the skills, behaviours, knowledge and attitudes of coastal activity participants. Analyses of this unique dataset will inform research that will underpin development and evaluation of coastal drowning prevention initiatives prioritising those most at risk. It is hoped that the methods detailed within this study may be useful for other countries to develop similar approaches to understanding their own population.Jasmin C LawesLea UebelhoerWilliam KoonLuke StrasiottoFrederic AnneShane DawRobert W BranderNick MulcahyAmy E PedenPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 8, p e0256202 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Jasmin C Lawes
Lea Uebelhoer
William Koon
Luke Strasiotto
Frederic Anne
Shane Daw
Robert W Brander
Nick Mulcahy
Amy E Peden
Understanding a population: A methodology for a population-based coastal safety survey.
description Drowning is a global public health problem, but accurately estimating drowning risk remains a challenge. Coastal drowning comprises a significant proportion of the drowning burden in Australia and is influenced by a range of behavioural factors (e.g. risk perception, knowledge, attitudes and behaviours) that are poorly understood. These factors, along with those that impact exposure (e.g. coastal visitation and activity participation) all impact on drowning risk. While excellent mortality and morbidity data exists in Australia, a lack of coastal participation data presents challenges to identifying high-risk groups or activities and prioritising prevention efforts. This methods paper describes the development and evolution of an ongoing, annual, nationally representative online survey as an effective tool used to capture valuable data about the Australian population's relationship with the coast. This paper explores how the survey is structured (12-14 sections spanning multiple topics and themes), the different question types used (including open text, 4-digit responses and categorical questions), the sample size (1400-1600 respondents), sampling strategy (using demographic quota sampling which can then be post-weighted to the population if required) and how topics and themes have changed over time to enhance the quality of data collected (i.e., wording changes to enhance participant comprehension or data usability and changing issue-specific 'feature' topics of interest such as campaign evaluation). How the survey is implemented online is described, both practically through to third-party recruitment processes and ethically to maximise anonymity of respondents and ensure data quality. Interim analyses indicate the impact of considering exposure when calculating fatal drowning rates, especially by activity (e.g., crude boating drowning rate 0.12 per 100,000 population vs 0.95 per 100,000 exposed population [relative risk = 8.01; 95% confidence interval: 4.55-14.10]). This study highlights lessons learned in the process of conducting a nationally representative coastal participation survey as well as the strengths and limitations of adopting this approach. Data collected will provide more detailed information on the skills, behaviours, knowledge and attitudes of coastal activity participants. Analyses of this unique dataset will inform research that will underpin development and evaluation of coastal drowning prevention initiatives prioritising those most at risk. It is hoped that the methods detailed within this study may be useful for other countries to develop similar approaches to understanding their own population.
format article
author Jasmin C Lawes
Lea Uebelhoer
William Koon
Luke Strasiotto
Frederic Anne
Shane Daw
Robert W Brander
Nick Mulcahy
Amy E Peden
author_facet Jasmin C Lawes
Lea Uebelhoer
William Koon
Luke Strasiotto
Frederic Anne
Shane Daw
Robert W Brander
Nick Mulcahy
Amy E Peden
author_sort Jasmin C Lawes
title Understanding a population: A methodology for a population-based coastal safety survey.
title_short Understanding a population: A methodology for a population-based coastal safety survey.
title_full Understanding a population: A methodology for a population-based coastal safety survey.
title_fullStr Understanding a population: A methodology for a population-based coastal safety survey.
title_full_unstemmed Understanding a population: A methodology for a population-based coastal safety survey.
title_sort understanding a population: a methodology for a population-based coastal safety survey.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/a1b31183b7ff4ce0849df0d8eab4de2c
work_keys_str_mv AT jasminclawes understandingapopulationamethodologyforapopulationbasedcoastalsafetysurvey
AT leauebelhoer understandingapopulationamethodologyforapopulationbasedcoastalsafetysurvey
AT williamkoon understandingapopulationamethodologyforapopulationbasedcoastalsafetysurvey
AT lukestrasiotto understandingapopulationamethodologyforapopulationbasedcoastalsafetysurvey
AT fredericanne understandingapopulationamethodologyforapopulationbasedcoastalsafetysurvey
AT shanedaw understandingapopulationamethodologyforapopulationbasedcoastalsafetysurvey
AT robertwbrander understandingapopulationamethodologyforapopulationbasedcoastalsafetysurvey
AT nickmulcahy understandingapopulationamethodologyforapopulationbasedcoastalsafetysurvey
AT amyepeden understandingapopulationamethodologyforapopulationbasedcoastalsafetysurvey
_version_ 1718374300395765760