Clinical implications of calcifying nanoparticles in dental diseases: a critical review
Mohammed S Alenazy,1 Hezekiah A Mosadomi2,3 1Restorative Dentistry Department, 2Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology Department, 3Research Center, Riyadh Colleges of Dentistry and Pharmacy, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Background: Unknown cell-culture contaminants were described by Kajander and Cift&ccedi...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/a1d99ec20f5545f0ace210427190aeb8 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:a1d99ec20f5545f0ace210427190aeb8 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:a1d99ec20f5545f0ace210427190aeb82021-12-02T11:07:29ZClinical implications of calcifying nanoparticles in dental diseases: a critical review1178-2013https://doaj.org/article/a1d99ec20f5545f0ace210427190aeb82013-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.dovepress.com/clinical-implications-of-calcifying-nanoparticles-in-dental-diseases-a-a15263https://doaj.org/toc/1178-2013 Mohammed S Alenazy,1 Hezekiah A Mosadomi2,3 1Restorative Dentistry Department, 2Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology Department, 3Research Center, Riyadh Colleges of Dentistry and Pharmacy, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Background: Unknown cell-culture contaminants were described by Kajander and Ciftçioğlu in 1998. These contaminants were called nanobacteria initially and later calcifying nanoparticles (CNPs). Their exact nature is unclear and controversial. CNPs have unique and unusual characteristics, which preclude placing them into any established evolutionary branch of life. Aim: The aim of this systematic review was to assess published data concerning CNPs since 1998 in general and in relation to dental diseases in particular. Materials and methods: The National Library of Medicine (PubMed) and Society of Photographic Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) electronic and manual searches were conducted. Nanobacteria and calcifying nanoparticles were used as keywords. The search yielded 135 full-length papers. Further screening of the titles and abstracts that followed the review criteria resulted in 43 papers that met the study aim. Conclusion: The review showed that the existence of nanobacteria is still controversial. Some investigators have described a possible involvement of CNPs in pulpal and salivary gland calcifications, as well as the possible therapeutic use of CNPs in the treatment of cracked and/or eroded teeth. Keywords: calcifying nanoparticles, nanobacteria, sialolith, pulp stone, enamel repairAlenazy MSMosadomi HADove Medical PressarticleMedicine (General)R5-920ENInternational Journal of Nanomedicine, Vol 2014, Iss Issue 1, Pp 27-31 (2013) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine (General) R5-920 |
spellingShingle |
Medicine (General) R5-920 Alenazy MS Mosadomi HA Clinical implications of calcifying nanoparticles in dental diseases: a critical review |
description |
Mohammed S Alenazy,1 Hezekiah A Mosadomi2,3 1Restorative Dentistry Department, 2Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology Department, 3Research Center, Riyadh Colleges of Dentistry and Pharmacy, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Background: Unknown cell-culture contaminants were described by Kajander and Ciftçioğlu in 1998. These contaminants were called nanobacteria initially and later calcifying nanoparticles (CNPs). Their exact nature is unclear and controversial. CNPs have unique and unusual characteristics, which preclude placing them into any established evolutionary branch of life. Aim: The aim of this systematic review was to assess published data concerning CNPs since 1998 in general and in relation to dental diseases in particular. Materials and methods: The National Library of Medicine (PubMed) and Society of Photographic Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) electronic and manual searches were conducted. Nanobacteria and calcifying nanoparticles were used as keywords. The search yielded 135 full-length papers. Further screening of the titles and abstracts that followed the review criteria resulted in 43 papers that met the study aim. Conclusion: The review showed that the existence of nanobacteria is still controversial. Some investigators have described a possible involvement of CNPs in pulpal and salivary gland calcifications, as well as the possible therapeutic use of CNPs in the treatment of cracked and/or eroded teeth. Keywords: calcifying nanoparticles, nanobacteria, sialolith, pulp stone, enamel repair |
format |
article |
author |
Alenazy MS Mosadomi HA |
author_facet |
Alenazy MS Mosadomi HA |
author_sort |
Alenazy MS |
title |
Clinical implications of calcifying nanoparticles in dental diseases: a critical review |
title_short |
Clinical implications of calcifying nanoparticles in dental diseases: a critical review |
title_full |
Clinical implications of calcifying nanoparticles in dental diseases: a critical review |
title_fullStr |
Clinical implications of calcifying nanoparticles in dental diseases: a critical review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Clinical implications of calcifying nanoparticles in dental diseases: a critical review |
title_sort |
clinical implications of calcifying nanoparticles in dental diseases: a critical review |
publisher |
Dove Medical Press |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/a1d99ec20f5545f0ace210427190aeb8 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT alenazyms clinicalimplicationsofcalcifyingnanoparticlesindentaldiseasesacriticalreview AT mosadomiha clinicalimplicationsofcalcifyingnanoparticlesindentaldiseasesacriticalreview |
_version_ |
1718396236038406144 |