How faculty define quality, prestige, and impact of academic journals

Despite the calls for change, there is significant consensus that when it comes to evaluating publications, review, promotion, and tenure processes should aim to reward research that is of high "quality," is published in "prestigious" journals, and has an "impact." Neve...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Esteban Morales, Erin C. McKiernan, Meredith T. Niles, Lesley Schimanski, Juan Pablo Alperin
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/a1f08b006eef44c2a5cad2d5b1fb8bc5
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:a1f08b006eef44c2a5cad2d5b1fb8bc5
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:a1f08b006eef44c2a5cad2d5b1fb8bc52021-11-04T06:49:39ZHow faculty define quality, prestige, and impact of academic journals1932-6203https://doaj.org/article/a1f08b006eef44c2a5cad2d5b1fb8bc52021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8553056/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Despite the calls for change, there is significant consensus that when it comes to evaluating publications, review, promotion, and tenure processes should aim to reward research that is of high "quality," is published in "prestigious" journals, and has an "impact." Nevertheless, such terms are highly subjective and present challenges to ascertain precisely what such research looks like. Accordingly, this article responds to the question: how do faculty from universities in the United States and Canada define the terms quality, prestige, and impact of academic journals? We address this question by surveying 338 faculty members from 55 different institutions in the U.S. and Canada. While relying on self-reported definitions that are not linked to their behavior, this study’s findings highlight that faculty often describe these distinct terms in overlapping ways. Additionally, results show that marked variance in definitions across faculty does not correspond to demographic characteristics. This study’s results highlight the subjectivity of common research terms and the importance of implementing evaluation regimes that do not rely on ill-defined concepts and may be context specific.Esteban MoralesErin C. McKiernanMeredith T. NilesLesley SchimanskiJuan Pablo AlperinPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 10 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Esteban Morales Erin C. McKiernan Meredith T. Niles Lesley Schimanski Juan Pablo Alperin How faculty define quality, prestige, and impact of academic journals
description	Despite the calls for change, there is significant consensus that when it comes to evaluating publications, review, promotion, and tenure processes should aim to reward research that is of high "quality," is published in "prestigious" journals, and has an "impact." Nevertheless, such terms are highly subjective and present challenges to ascertain precisely what such research looks like. Accordingly, this article responds to the question: how do faculty from universities in the United States and Canada define the terms quality, prestige, and impact of academic journals? We address this question by surveying 338 faculty members from 55 different institutions in the U.S. and Canada. While relying on self-reported definitions that are not linked to their behavior, this study’s findings highlight that faculty often describe these distinct terms in overlapping ways. Additionally, results show that marked variance in definitions across faculty does not correspond to demographic characteristics. This study’s results highlight the subjectivity of common research terms and the importance of implementing evaluation regimes that do not rely on ill-defined concepts and may be context specific.
format	article
author	Esteban Morales Erin C. McKiernan Meredith T. Niles Lesley Schimanski Juan Pablo Alperin
author_facet	Esteban Morales Erin C. McKiernan Meredith T. Niles Lesley Schimanski Juan Pablo Alperin
author_sort	Esteban Morales
title	How faculty define quality, prestige, and impact of academic journals
title_short	How faculty define quality, prestige, and impact of academic journals
title_full	How faculty define quality, prestige, and impact of academic journals
title_fullStr	How faculty define quality, prestige, and impact of academic journals
title_full_unstemmed	How faculty define quality, prestige, and impact of academic journals
title_sort	how faculty define quality, prestige, and impact of academic journals
publisher	Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/a1f08b006eef44c2a5cad2d5b1fb8bc5
work_keys_str_mv	AT estebanmorales howfacultydefinequalityprestigeandimpactofacademicjournals AT erincmckiernan howfacultydefinequalityprestigeandimpactofacademicjournals AT meredithtniles howfacultydefinequalityprestigeandimpactofacademicjournals AT lesleyschimanski howfacultydefinequalityprestigeandimpactofacademicjournals AT juanpabloalperin howfacultydefinequalityprestigeandimpactofacademicjournals
_version_	1718445105854021632

How faculty define quality, prestige, and impact of academic journals

Ejemplares similares