Promises and pitfalls of digital credit: Empirical evidence from Kenya.
Digital credit is a recent innovation that raises hopes of improving credit access in developing countries. However, up until now, empirical research on the extent to which digital credit actually reaches people who are otherwise excluded from conventional credit markets and whether increased credit...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/a1f83cfafebb4def964bac45878144df |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:a1f83cfafebb4def964bac45878144df |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:a1f83cfafebb4def964bac45878144df2021-12-02T20:06:29ZPromises and pitfalls of digital credit: Empirical evidence from Kenya.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0255215https://doaj.org/article/a1f83cfafebb4def964bac45878144df2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255215https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Digital credit is a recent innovation that raises hopes of improving credit access in developing countries. However, up until now, empirical research on the extent to which digital credit actually reaches people who are otherwise excluded from conventional credit markets and whether increased credit access is sustainable or threatened by high default and blacklisting rates is very scarce. Using representative data from Kenya, this article shows that digital credit increases borrowing opportunities, including for people less likely to otherwise have credit access in the conventional credit markets. However, we find that digital credit borrowing is also responsible for 90% of all blacklistings, which is partially driven by higher default rates in the digital credit market but also by a higher probability that digital credit defaults lead to blacklisting of the borrower, compared to defaults in other credit markets.Constantin JohnenMartin ParlascaOliver MußhoffPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 7, p e0255215 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Constantin Johnen Martin Parlasca Oliver Mußhoff Promises and pitfalls of digital credit: Empirical evidence from Kenya. |
description |
Digital credit is a recent innovation that raises hopes of improving credit access in developing countries. However, up until now, empirical research on the extent to which digital credit actually reaches people who are otherwise excluded from conventional credit markets and whether increased credit access is sustainable or threatened by high default and blacklisting rates is very scarce. Using representative data from Kenya, this article shows that digital credit increases borrowing opportunities, including for people less likely to otherwise have credit access in the conventional credit markets. However, we find that digital credit borrowing is also responsible for 90% of all blacklistings, which is partially driven by higher default rates in the digital credit market but also by a higher probability that digital credit defaults lead to blacklisting of the borrower, compared to defaults in other credit markets. |
format |
article |
author |
Constantin Johnen Martin Parlasca Oliver Mußhoff |
author_facet |
Constantin Johnen Martin Parlasca Oliver Mußhoff |
author_sort |
Constantin Johnen |
title |
Promises and pitfalls of digital credit: Empirical evidence from Kenya. |
title_short |
Promises and pitfalls of digital credit: Empirical evidence from Kenya. |
title_full |
Promises and pitfalls of digital credit: Empirical evidence from Kenya. |
title_fullStr |
Promises and pitfalls of digital credit: Empirical evidence from Kenya. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Promises and pitfalls of digital credit: Empirical evidence from Kenya. |
title_sort |
promises and pitfalls of digital credit: empirical evidence from kenya. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/a1f83cfafebb4def964bac45878144df |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT constantinjohnen promisesandpitfallsofdigitalcreditempiricalevidencefromkenya AT martinparlasca promisesandpitfallsofdigitalcreditempiricalevidencefromkenya AT olivermußhoff promisesandpitfallsofdigitalcreditempiricalevidencefromkenya |
_version_ |
1718375378712526848 |