Challenges in the clinical measurement of ocular surface disease in glaucoma patients

Stephen C Pflugfelder1, Christophe Baudouin2,3 1Ophthalmology-Ocular Surface Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA; 2Department of Ophthalmology, Quinze-Vingts Hospital, Paris, France; 3Vision Institute, Paris, France Abstract: Ocular surface disease (OSD) is common among glaucoma pat...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pflugfelder SC, Baudouin C
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a20ad575dc5b43bd87fb3f4a336cd747
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a20ad575dc5b43bd87fb3f4a336cd747
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a20ad575dc5b43bd87fb3f4a336cd7472021-12-02T04:13:27ZChallenges in the clinical measurement of ocular surface disease in glaucoma patients1177-54671177-5483https://doaj.org/article/a20ad575dc5b43bd87fb3f4a336cd7472011-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.dovepress.com/challenges-in-the-clinical-measurement-of-ocular-surface-disease-in-gl-a8578https://doaj.org/toc/1177-5467https://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Stephen C Pflugfelder1, Christophe Baudouin2,3 1Ophthalmology-Ocular Surface Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA; 2Department of Ophthalmology, Quinze-Vingts Hospital, Paris, France; 3Vision Institute, Paris, France Abstract: Ocular surface disease (OSD) is common among glaucoma patients. Clinical assessment of OSD can be challenging. This review focuses on some of the limitations relating to both subjective and objective measures of OSD, including dry eye. A survey of the literature was conducted to identify the caveats associated with different methods of assessing OSD. The effect of preservatives on the ocular surface, with respect to glaucoma patients in particular, was also reviewed. Objective methods for assessing ocular surface health and disease include the Schirmer test, tear break-up time, fluorescein turnover, corneal and conjunctival staining, tear osmolarity, and vital dyes. These measures all have limitations in terms of their ability to grade the severity of OSD. Previous studies using the OSD Index showed a mild-to-moderate correlation to dry eye disease severity. Other scoring systems for dry eye have shown a relationship to patient symptom scores or quality of life. Due to the challenges clinicians face concerning both subjective and objective ocular surface health assessments, discerning clinical improvement in ocular surface disease can be a challenge. Further research is needed in order to optimize existing clinical methods and/or identify alternative techniques for assessing OSD in the glaucoma population. Keywords: dry eye, glaucoma, ocular surface disease, ocular surface disease index, preservatives, tear break-up timePflugfelder SCBaudouin CDove Medical PressarticleOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol 2011, Iss default, Pp 1575-1583 (2011)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Pflugfelder SC
Baudouin C
Challenges in the clinical measurement of ocular surface disease in glaucoma patients
description Stephen C Pflugfelder1, Christophe Baudouin2,3 1Ophthalmology-Ocular Surface Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA; 2Department of Ophthalmology, Quinze-Vingts Hospital, Paris, France; 3Vision Institute, Paris, France Abstract: Ocular surface disease (OSD) is common among glaucoma patients. Clinical assessment of OSD can be challenging. This review focuses on some of the limitations relating to both subjective and objective measures of OSD, including dry eye. A survey of the literature was conducted to identify the caveats associated with different methods of assessing OSD. The effect of preservatives on the ocular surface, with respect to glaucoma patients in particular, was also reviewed. Objective methods for assessing ocular surface health and disease include the Schirmer test, tear break-up time, fluorescein turnover, corneal and conjunctival staining, tear osmolarity, and vital dyes. These measures all have limitations in terms of their ability to grade the severity of OSD. Previous studies using the OSD Index showed a mild-to-moderate correlation to dry eye disease severity. Other scoring systems for dry eye have shown a relationship to patient symptom scores or quality of life. Due to the challenges clinicians face concerning both subjective and objective ocular surface health assessments, discerning clinical improvement in ocular surface disease can be a challenge. Further research is needed in order to optimize existing clinical methods and/or identify alternative techniques for assessing OSD in the glaucoma population. Keywords: dry eye, glaucoma, ocular surface disease, ocular surface disease index, preservatives, tear break-up time
format article
author Pflugfelder SC
Baudouin C
author_facet Pflugfelder SC
Baudouin C
author_sort Pflugfelder SC
title Challenges in the clinical measurement of ocular surface disease in glaucoma patients
title_short Challenges in the clinical measurement of ocular surface disease in glaucoma patients
title_full Challenges in the clinical measurement of ocular surface disease in glaucoma patients
title_fullStr Challenges in the clinical measurement of ocular surface disease in glaucoma patients
title_full_unstemmed Challenges in the clinical measurement of ocular surface disease in glaucoma patients
title_sort challenges in the clinical measurement of ocular surface disease in glaucoma patients
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2011
url https://doaj.org/article/a20ad575dc5b43bd87fb3f4a336cd747
work_keys_str_mv AT pflugfeldersc challengesintheclinicalmeasurementofocularsurfacediseaseinglaucomapatients
AT baudouinc challengesintheclinicalmeasurementofocularsurfacediseaseinglaucomapatients
_version_ 1718401390087241728