Beyond livestock carrying capacity in the Sahelian and Sudanian zones of West Africa

Abstract We applied the process-based model, LandscapeDNDC, to estimate feed availability in the Sahelian and Sudanian agro-ecological zones of West Africa as a basis for calculating the regional Livestock Carrying Capacity (LCC). Comparison of the energy supply (S) from feed resources, including na...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jaber Rahimi, Edwin Haas, Rüdiger Grote, David Kraus, Andrew Smerald, Patrick Laux, John Goopy, Klaus Butterbach-Bahl
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a2207dd4bd464bde8d1311dee608c39c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a2207dd4bd464bde8d1311dee608c39c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a2207dd4bd464bde8d1311dee608c39c2021-11-14T12:18:25ZBeyond livestock carrying capacity in the Sahelian and Sudanian zones of West Africa10.1038/s41598-021-01706-42045-2322https://doaj.org/article/a2207dd4bd464bde8d1311dee608c39c2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01706-4https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract We applied the process-based model, LandscapeDNDC, to estimate feed availability in the Sahelian and Sudanian agro-ecological zones of West Africa as a basis for calculating the regional Livestock Carrying Capacity (LCC). Comparison of the energy supply (S) from feed resources, including natural pasture, browse, and crop residues, with energy demand (D) of the livestock population for the period 1981–2020 allowed us to assess regional surpluses (S > D) or deficits (S < D) in feed availability. We show that in the last 40 years a large-scale shift from surplus to deficit has occurred. While during 1981–1990 only 27% of the area exceeded the LCC, it was 72% for the period 2011–2020. This was caused by a reduction in the total feed supply of ~ 8% and an increase in feed demand of ~ 37% per-decade, driven by climate change and increased livestock population, respectively. Overall, the S/D decreased from ~ 2.6 (surplus) in 1981 to ~ 0.5 (deficit) in 2019, with a north–south gradient of increasing S/D. As climate change continues and feed availability may likely further shrink, pastoralists either need to source external feed or significantly reduce livestock numbers to avoid overgrazing, land degradation, and any further conflicts for resources.Jaber RahimiEdwin HaasRüdiger GroteDavid KrausAndrew SmeraldPatrick LauxJohn GoopyKlaus Butterbach-BahlNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-15 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Jaber Rahimi
Edwin Haas
Rüdiger Grote
David Kraus
Andrew Smerald
Patrick Laux
John Goopy
Klaus Butterbach-Bahl
Beyond livestock carrying capacity in the Sahelian and Sudanian zones of West Africa
description Abstract We applied the process-based model, LandscapeDNDC, to estimate feed availability in the Sahelian and Sudanian agro-ecological zones of West Africa as a basis for calculating the regional Livestock Carrying Capacity (LCC). Comparison of the energy supply (S) from feed resources, including natural pasture, browse, and crop residues, with energy demand (D) of the livestock population for the period 1981–2020 allowed us to assess regional surpluses (S > D) or deficits (S < D) in feed availability. We show that in the last 40 years a large-scale shift from surplus to deficit has occurred. While during 1981–1990 only 27% of the area exceeded the LCC, it was 72% for the period 2011–2020. This was caused by a reduction in the total feed supply of ~ 8% and an increase in feed demand of ~ 37% per-decade, driven by climate change and increased livestock population, respectively. Overall, the S/D decreased from ~ 2.6 (surplus) in 1981 to ~ 0.5 (deficit) in 2019, with a north–south gradient of increasing S/D. As climate change continues and feed availability may likely further shrink, pastoralists either need to source external feed or significantly reduce livestock numbers to avoid overgrazing, land degradation, and any further conflicts for resources.
format article
author Jaber Rahimi
Edwin Haas
Rüdiger Grote
David Kraus
Andrew Smerald
Patrick Laux
John Goopy
Klaus Butterbach-Bahl
author_facet Jaber Rahimi
Edwin Haas
Rüdiger Grote
David Kraus
Andrew Smerald
Patrick Laux
John Goopy
Klaus Butterbach-Bahl
author_sort Jaber Rahimi
title Beyond livestock carrying capacity in the Sahelian and Sudanian zones of West Africa
title_short Beyond livestock carrying capacity in the Sahelian and Sudanian zones of West Africa
title_full Beyond livestock carrying capacity in the Sahelian and Sudanian zones of West Africa
title_fullStr Beyond livestock carrying capacity in the Sahelian and Sudanian zones of West Africa
title_full_unstemmed Beyond livestock carrying capacity in the Sahelian and Sudanian zones of West Africa
title_sort beyond livestock carrying capacity in the sahelian and sudanian zones of west africa
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/a2207dd4bd464bde8d1311dee608c39c
work_keys_str_mv AT jaberrahimi beyondlivestockcarryingcapacityinthesahelianandsudanianzonesofwestafrica
AT edwinhaas beyondlivestockcarryingcapacityinthesahelianandsudanianzonesofwestafrica
AT rudigergrote beyondlivestockcarryingcapacityinthesahelianandsudanianzonesofwestafrica
AT davidkraus beyondlivestockcarryingcapacityinthesahelianandsudanianzonesofwestafrica
AT andrewsmerald beyondlivestockcarryingcapacityinthesahelianandsudanianzonesofwestafrica
AT patricklaux beyondlivestockcarryingcapacityinthesahelianandsudanianzonesofwestafrica
AT johngoopy beyondlivestockcarryingcapacityinthesahelianandsudanianzonesofwestafrica
AT klausbutterbachbahl beyondlivestockcarryingcapacityinthesahelianandsudanianzonesofwestafrica
_version_ 1718429305056264192