The Response to September 11: A Disaster Case Study

Background: The response to 9/11 continues into its 14th year. The World Trade Center Health Program (WTCHP), a long-term monitoring and treatment program now funded by the Zadroga Act of 2010, includes >60,000 World Trade Center (WTC) disaster responders and community members (“survivors”). The...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michael A. Crane, Nomi C. Levy-Carrick, Laura Crowley, Stephanie Barnhart, Melissa Dudas, Uchechukwu Onuoha, Yelena Globina, Winta Haile, Gauri Shukla, Fatih Ozbay
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a23144841b2940b3892d3e3d72560662
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a23144841b2940b3892d3e3d72560662
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a23144841b2940b3892d3e3d725606622021-12-02T07:41:18ZThe Response to September 11: A Disaster Case Study2214-999610.1016/j.aogh.2014.08.215https://doaj.org/article/a23144841b2940b3892d3e3d725606622014-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://annalsofglobalhealth.org/articles/2063https://doaj.org/toc/2214-9996Background: The response to 9/11 continues into its 14th year. The World Trade Center Health Program (WTCHP), a long-term monitoring and treatment program now funded by the Zadroga Act of 2010, includes >60,000 World Trade Center (WTC) disaster responders and community members (“survivors”). The aim of this review is to identify several elements that have had a critical impact on the evolution of the WTC response and, directly or indirectly, the health of the WTC-exposed population. It further explores post-disaster monitoring efforts, recent scientific findings from the WTCHP, and some implications of this experience for ongoing and future environmental disaster response. Findings: Transparency and responsiveness, site safety and worker training, assessment of acute and chronic exposure, and development of clinical expertise are interconnected elements determining efficacy of disaster response. Conclusion: Even in a relatively well-resourced environment, challenges regarding allocation of appropriate attention to <a title="Learn more about Vulnerable Populations" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/vulnerable-populations">vulnerable populations</a> and integration of treatment response to significant medical and mental health comorbidities remain areas of ongoing programmatic development.Michael A. CraneNomi C. Levy-CarrickLaura CrowleyStephanie BarnhartMelissa DudasUchechukwu OnuohaYelena GlobinaWinta HaileGauri ShuklaFatih OzbayUbiquity Pressarticledisaster responseenvironmental disaster9/11post-disaster health surveillanceWorld Trade CenterInfectious and parasitic diseasesRC109-216Public aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENAnnals of Global Health, Vol 80, Iss 4, Pp 320-331 (2014)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic disaster response
environmental disaster
9/11
post-disaster health surveillance
World Trade Center
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
spellingShingle disaster response
environmental disaster
9/11
post-disaster health surveillance
World Trade Center
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Michael A. Crane
Nomi C. Levy-Carrick
Laura Crowley
Stephanie Barnhart
Melissa Dudas
Uchechukwu Onuoha
Yelena Globina
Winta Haile
Gauri Shukla
Fatih Ozbay
The Response to September 11: A Disaster Case Study
description Background: The response to 9/11 continues into its 14th year. The World Trade Center Health Program (WTCHP), a long-term monitoring and treatment program now funded by the Zadroga Act of 2010, includes >60,000 World Trade Center (WTC) disaster responders and community members (“survivors”). The aim of this review is to identify several elements that have had a critical impact on the evolution of the WTC response and, directly or indirectly, the health of the WTC-exposed population. It further explores post-disaster monitoring efforts, recent scientific findings from the WTCHP, and some implications of this experience for ongoing and future environmental disaster response. Findings: Transparency and responsiveness, site safety and worker training, assessment of acute and chronic exposure, and development of clinical expertise are interconnected elements determining efficacy of disaster response. Conclusion: Even in a relatively well-resourced environment, challenges regarding allocation of appropriate attention to <a title="Learn more about Vulnerable Populations" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/vulnerable-populations">vulnerable populations</a> and integration of treatment response to significant medical and mental health comorbidities remain areas of ongoing programmatic development.
format article
author Michael A. Crane
Nomi C. Levy-Carrick
Laura Crowley
Stephanie Barnhart
Melissa Dudas
Uchechukwu Onuoha
Yelena Globina
Winta Haile
Gauri Shukla
Fatih Ozbay
author_facet Michael A. Crane
Nomi C. Levy-Carrick
Laura Crowley
Stephanie Barnhart
Melissa Dudas
Uchechukwu Onuoha
Yelena Globina
Winta Haile
Gauri Shukla
Fatih Ozbay
author_sort Michael A. Crane
title The Response to September 11: A Disaster Case Study
title_short The Response to September 11: A Disaster Case Study
title_full The Response to September 11: A Disaster Case Study
title_fullStr The Response to September 11: A Disaster Case Study
title_full_unstemmed The Response to September 11: A Disaster Case Study
title_sort response to september 11: a disaster case study
publisher Ubiquity Press
publishDate 2014
url https://doaj.org/article/a23144841b2940b3892d3e3d72560662
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelacrane theresponsetoseptember11adisastercasestudy
AT nomiclevycarrick theresponsetoseptember11adisastercasestudy
AT lauracrowley theresponsetoseptember11adisastercasestudy
AT stephaniebarnhart theresponsetoseptember11adisastercasestudy
AT melissadudas theresponsetoseptember11adisastercasestudy
AT uchechukwuonuoha theresponsetoseptember11adisastercasestudy
AT yelenaglobina theresponsetoseptember11adisastercasestudy
AT wintahaile theresponsetoseptember11adisastercasestudy
AT gaurishukla theresponsetoseptember11adisastercasestudy
AT fatihozbay theresponsetoseptember11adisastercasestudy
AT michaelacrane responsetoseptember11adisastercasestudy
AT nomiclevycarrick responsetoseptember11adisastercasestudy
AT lauracrowley responsetoseptember11adisastercasestudy
AT stephaniebarnhart responsetoseptember11adisastercasestudy
AT melissadudas responsetoseptember11adisastercasestudy
AT uchechukwuonuoha responsetoseptember11adisastercasestudy
AT yelenaglobina responsetoseptember11adisastercasestudy
AT wintahaile responsetoseptember11adisastercasestudy
AT gaurishukla responsetoseptember11adisastercasestudy
AT fatihozbay responsetoseptember11adisastercasestudy
_version_ 1718399240430944256