Pigeons show how meta-control enables decision-making in an ambiguous world

Abstract In situations where the left and right brain sides receive conflicting information that leads to incompatible response options, the brain requires efficient problem-solving mechanisms. This problem is particularly significant in lateralized brains, in which the hemispheres differ in encodin...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martina Manns, Tobias Otto, Laurenz Salm
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a28799d40cbd44c9af6ac4d01316c972
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a28799d40cbd44c9af6ac4d01316c972
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a28799d40cbd44c9af6ac4d01316c9722021-12-02T14:21:42ZPigeons show how meta-control enables decision-making in an ambiguous world10.1038/s41598-021-83406-72045-2322https://doaj.org/article/a28799d40cbd44c9af6ac4d01316c9722021-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83406-7https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract In situations where the left and right brain sides receive conflicting information that leads to incompatible response options, the brain requires efficient problem-solving mechanisms. This problem is particularly significant in lateralized brains, in which the hemispheres differ in encoding strategies or attention focus and hence, consider different information for decision-making. Meta-control, in which one hemisphere dominates ambiguous decisions, can be a mechanism that ensures fast behavioral reactions. We therefore confronted pigeons with a task in which two stimulus classes were brought into conflict. To this end, we trained pigeons simultaneously on two categories (cats or dogs) whereby each hemisphere learnt only one of the categories respectively. After learning, the birds were confronted with stimulus pairs that combined a picture with a cat (positive for one hemisphere) and a picture with a dog (positive for the other hemisphere). Pecking responses indicated the hemisphere dominating response selection. Pigeons displayed individual meta-control despite equal categorization performances of both brain hemispheres. This means that hemispheric dominance only emerged in interhemispheric conflict situations. The analysis of response latencies indicate that conflict decisions relied on intrahemispheric processes. Interhemispheric components played a role for more complex decisions. This flexibility could be a crucial building block for the evolutionary success of a lateralized brain.Martina MannsTobias OttoLaurenz SalmNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Martina Manns
Tobias Otto
Laurenz Salm
Pigeons show how meta-control enables decision-making in an ambiguous world
description Abstract In situations where the left and right brain sides receive conflicting information that leads to incompatible response options, the brain requires efficient problem-solving mechanisms. This problem is particularly significant in lateralized brains, in which the hemispheres differ in encoding strategies or attention focus and hence, consider different information for decision-making. Meta-control, in which one hemisphere dominates ambiguous decisions, can be a mechanism that ensures fast behavioral reactions. We therefore confronted pigeons with a task in which two stimulus classes were brought into conflict. To this end, we trained pigeons simultaneously on two categories (cats or dogs) whereby each hemisphere learnt only one of the categories respectively. After learning, the birds were confronted with stimulus pairs that combined a picture with a cat (positive for one hemisphere) and a picture with a dog (positive for the other hemisphere). Pecking responses indicated the hemisphere dominating response selection. Pigeons displayed individual meta-control despite equal categorization performances of both brain hemispheres. This means that hemispheric dominance only emerged in interhemispheric conflict situations. The analysis of response latencies indicate that conflict decisions relied on intrahemispheric processes. Interhemispheric components played a role for more complex decisions. This flexibility could be a crucial building block for the evolutionary success of a lateralized brain.
format article
author Martina Manns
Tobias Otto
Laurenz Salm
author_facet Martina Manns
Tobias Otto
Laurenz Salm
author_sort Martina Manns
title Pigeons show how meta-control enables decision-making in an ambiguous world
title_short Pigeons show how meta-control enables decision-making in an ambiguous world
title_full Pigeons show how meta-control enables decision-making in an ambiguous world
title_fullStr Pigeons show how meta-control enables decision-making in an ambiguous world
title_full_unstemmed Pigeons show how meta-control enables decision-making in an ambiguous world
title_sort pigeons show how meta-control enables decision-making in an ambiguous world
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/a28799d40cbd44c9af6ac4d01316c972
work_keys_str_mv AT martinamanns pigeonsshowhowmetacontrolenablesdecisionmakinginanambiguousworld
AT tobiasotto pigeonsshowhowmetacontrolenablesdecisionmakinginanambiguousworld
AT laurenzsalm pigeonsshowhowmetacontrolenablesdecisionmakinginanambiguousworld
_version_ 1718391506509758464