COMPARISON STUDY OF ENERGY EXPENDITURE CALCULATION BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL METHOD AND IRETON-JONES METHOD FOR CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT

Background: The critically ill patients are having nutrition problems in dealing with the critical condition. The problem of nutrition is demanding on the severity of illness. Therefore, the ICU nurses should understand how nutrition can support the patients’ recovery. Objective: This study’s aim...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Suhartini Ismail, Rizqi Nursasmita
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Belitung Raya Foundation 2017
Materias:	energy expenditure conventional method Ireton-Jones method critically ill patients Nursing RT1-120
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/a2be68d525654241b9d1fd97ff219e9e
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:a2be68d525654241b9d1fd97ff219e9e
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:a2be68d525654241b9d1fd97ff219e9e2021-12-02T11:17:18ZCOMPARISON STUDY OF ENERGY EXPENDITURE CALCULATION BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL METHOD AND IRETON-JONES METHOD FOR CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT2477-40732477-4073https://doaj.org/article/a2be68d525654241b9d1fd97ff219e9e2017-04-01T00:00:00Zhttp://belitungraya.org/BRP/index.php/bnj/article/view/45https://doaj.org/toc/2477-4073https://doaj.org/toc/2477-4073Background: The critically ill patients are having nutrition problems in dealing with the critical condition. The problem of nutrition is demanding on the severity of illness. Therefore, the ICU nurses should understand how nutrition can support the patients’ recovery. Objective: This study’s aim was to compare the result of energy expenditure calculation of conventional method with Ireton-Jones method for critically ill patients in the intensive care unit. Methods: This was a comparative and cross sectional study which recruited 40 samples. The samples were divided into two groups, conventional group method and Ireton-Jones group method, and they met the inclusion criteria. The sample of this study was determined by convenience sampling. To answer the hypothesis, the hypothesis test used Independent sample t-test. Results: The results revealed that there is no significance difference between energy expenditure calculation conventional method and Ireton-Jones method statically. In the other word, either used the conventional method or the Ireton Jones method, the result of energy expenditure calculation has statically significant difference. Conclusion: It can be concluded that the nurse can use both method to calculate the energy expenditure for critically ill patients to meet their nutrition need. We suggest that for further investigation will recruit many samples and do control of other factors that might be influenced in the study. Suhartini IsmailRizqi NursasmitaBelitung Raya Foundationarticleenergy expenditureconventional methodIreton-Jones methodcritically ill patientsNursingRT1-120ENBelitung Nursing Journal, Vol 3, Iss 2, Pp 73-82 (2017)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	energy expenditure conventional method Ireton-Jones method critically ill patients Nursing RT1-120
spellingShingle	energy expenditure conventional method Ireton-Jones method critically ill patients Nursing RT1-120 Suhartini Ismail Rizqi Nursasmita COMPARISON STUDY OF ENERGY EXPENDITURE CALCULATION BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL METHOD AND IRETON-JONES METHOD FOR CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT
description	Background: The critically ill patients are having nutrition problems in dealing with the critical condition. The problem of nutrition is demanding on the severity of illness. Therefore, the ICU nurses should understand how nutrition can support the patients’ recovery. Objective: This study’s aim was to compare the result of energy expenditure calculation of conventional method with Ireton-Jones method for critically ill patients in the intensive care unit. Methods: This was a comparative and cross sectional study which recruited 40 samples. The samples were divided into two groups, conventional group method and Ireton-Jones group method, and they met the inclusion criteria. The sample of this study was determined by convenience sampling. To answer the hypothesis, the hypothesis test used Independent sample t-test. Results: The results revealed that there is no significance difference between energy expenditure calculation conventional method and Ireton-Jones method statically. In the other word, either used the conventional method or the Ireton Jones method, the result of energy expenditure calculation has statically significant difference. Conclusion: It can be concluded that the nurse can use both method to calculate the energy expenditure for critically ill patients to meet their nutrition need. We suggest that for further investigation will recruit many samples and do control of other factors that might be influenced in the study.
format	article
author	Suhartini Ismail Rizqi Nursasmita
author_facet	Suhartini Ismail Rizqi Nursasmita
author_sort	Suhartini Ismail
title	COMPARISON STUDY OF ENERGY EXPENDITURE CALCULATION BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL METHOD AND IRETON-JONES METHOD FOR CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT
title_short	COMPARISON STUDY OF ENERGY EXPENDITURE CALCULATION BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL METHOD AND IRETON-JONES METHOD FOR CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT
title_full	COMPARISON STUDY OF ENERGY EXPENDITURE CALCULATION BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL METHOD AND IRETON-JONES METHOD FOR CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT
title_fullStr	COMPARISON STUDY OF ENERGY EXPENDITURE CALCULATION BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL METHOD AND IRETON-JONES METHOD FOR CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT
title_full_unstemmed	COMPARISON STUDY OF ENERGY EXPENDITURE CALCULATION BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL METHOD AND IRETON-JONES METHOD FOR CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT
title_sort	comparison study of energy expenditure calculation between conventional method and ireton-jones method for critically ill patient
publisher	Belitung Raya Foundation
publishDate	2017
url	https://doaj.org/article/a2be68d525654241b9d1fd97ff219e9e
work_keys_str_mv	AT suhartiniismail comparisonstudyofenergyexpenditurecalculationbetweenconventionalmethodandiretonjonesmethodforcriticallyillpatient AT rizqinursasmita comparisonstudyofenergyexpenditurecalculationbetweenconventionalmethodandiretonjonesmethodforcriticallyillpatient
_version_	1718396059148877824

COMPARISON STUDY OF ENERGY EXPENDITURE CALCULATION BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL METHOD AND IRETON-JONES METHOD FOR CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT

Ejemplares similares