Midwives’ and Women’s Perception on Moyo Fetal Heart Rate Monitor for Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring; A Cross-Sectional Study

Paschal Mdoe, Anita Yeconia, Fanuel Buu, Simeon Kusulla, Ladislaus Blacy, Godfrey Guga, Estomih Mduma, Hussein Kidanto Department of Research, Haydom Lutheran Hospital, Haydom, TanzaniaCorrespondence: Paschal Mdoe P.o. Box 9000, Haydom, Manyara, TanzaniaTel +255 754429346Email pfmdoe@gmail.comBackgr...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mdoe P, Yeconia A, Buu F, Kusulla S, Blacy L, Guga G, Mduma E, Kidanto H
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a2cba282461b4e80a045d0a54bffc7bd
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a2cba282461b4e80a045d0a54bffc7bd
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a2cba282461b4e80a045d0a54bffc7bd2021-12-02T09:04:21ZMidwives’ and Women’s Perception on Moyo Fetal Heart Rate Monitor for Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring; A Cross-Sectional Study1179-1470https://doaj.org/article/a2cba282461b4e80a045d0a54bffc7bd2020-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/midwives-and-womens-perception-on-moyo-fetal-heart-rate-monitor-for-in-peer-reviewed-article-MDERhttps://doaj.org/toc/1179-1470Paschal Mdoe, Anita Yeconia, Fanuel Buu, Simeon Kusulla, Ladislaus Blacy, Godfrey Guga, Estomih Mduma, Hussein Kidanto Department of Research, Haydom Lutheran Hospital, Haydom, TanzaniaCorrespondence: Paschal Mdoe P.o. Box 9000, Haydom, Manyara, TanzaniaTel +255 754429346Email pfmdoe@gmail.comBackground: The annual global neonatal mortality stands at 2.5 million deaths, 1 million of them dying within the first day of life. An additional 2.6 million are stillborn globally, the majority of them due to intrapartum events. Optimal fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring has the potential to timely detect fetuses at risk and, if coupled with timely obstetric responses may save more newborns. Moyo is a new Doppler with nine crystals capable of monitoring FHR both intermittently and continuously.Aim: To assess women’s and midwives’ opinions on the use of Moyo for intrapartum FHR monitoring.Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using a structured questionnaire to assess women’s and midwives’ perception. Women who gave birth at the hospital who used Moyo were interviewed using a questionnaire immediately before discharge from the hospital. Twenty-eight midwives who have been using Moyo for more than 6 months were also interviewed using a structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed using excel and result presented in figures.Results: In total 113 postpartum women who were monitored using Moyo were interviewed before discharge. Out of these, 46 (40.7%) were first-time mothers and the rest were multipara. In total, 95 women (84.1%) used Moyo and other devices for FHR monitoring, 81 (72%) said Moyo was better than Fetoscopes and handheld Doppler, two-third 75 (66.4%) felt that Moyo was comfortable and 93 (82.3%) would like Moyo to be used on them in the future. Out of 28 midwives, 11 (39.3%) used Moyo continuous only, 3 (10.7%) used Moyo intermittently only and 14 (50.0%) used both intermittent and continuous. Thirteen (46.4%) midwives prefer to use Moyo both intermittent and continuous. Sixteen (55.6%) said Moyo was effective, 21 (75%) felt comfortable to use Moyo, and 13 (46.4%) said Moyo was easy to use.Conclusion: The majority of midwives and women who used Moyo felt that Moyo was comfortable for intrapartum FHR monitoring. Moyo can be used both intermittently and continuously depending on the user’s preferences.Keywords: Moyo, fetal heart rate, labor, midwives, womenMdoe PYeconia ABuu FKusulla SBlacy LGuga GMduma EKidanto HDove Medical Pressarticlemoyofetal heart ratelabormidwiveswomenMedical technologyR855-855.5ENMedical Devices: Evidence and Research, Vol Volume 13, Pp 87-92 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic moyo
fetal heart rate
labor
midwives
women
Medical technology
R855-855.5
spellingShingle moyo
fetal heart rate
labor
midwives
women
Medical technology
R855-855.5
Mdoe P
Yeconia A
Buu F
Kusulla S
Blacy L
Guga G
Mduma E
Kidanto H
Midwives’ and Women’s Perception on Moyo Fetal Heart Rate Monitor for Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring; A Cross-Sectional Study
description Paschal Mdoe, Anita Yeconia, Fanuel Buu, Simeon Kusulla, Ladislaus Blacy, Godfrey Guga, Estomih Mduma, Hussein Kidanto Department of Research, Haydom Lutheran Hospital, Haydom, TanzaniaCorrespondence: Paschal Mdoe P.o. Box 9000, Haydom, Manyara, TanzaniaTel +255 754429346Email pfmdoe@gmail.comBackground: The annual global neonatal mortality stands at 2.5 million deaths, 1 million of them dying within the first day of life. An additional 2.6 million are stillborn globally, the majority of them due to intrapartum events. Optimal fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring has the potential to timely detect fetuses at risk and, if coupled with timely obstetric responses may save more newborns. Moyo is a new Doppler with nine crystals capable of monitoring FHR both intermittently and continuously.Aim: To assess women’s and midwives’ opinions on the use of Moyo for intrapartum FHR monitoring.Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using a structured questionnaire to assess women’s and midwives’ perception. Women who gave birth at the hospital who used Moyo were interviewed using a questionnaire immediately before discharge from the hospital. Twenty-eight midwives who have been using Moyo for more than 6 months were also interviewed using a structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed using excel and result presented in figures.Results: In total 113 postpartum women who were monitored using Moyo were interviewed before discharge. Out of these, 46 (40.7%) were first-time mothers and the rest were multipara. In total, 95 women (84.1%) used Moyo and other devices for FHR monitoring, 81 (72%) said Moyo was better than Fetoscopes and handheld Doppler, two-third 75 (66.4%) felt that Moyo was comfortable and 93 (82.3%) would like Moyo to be used on them in the future. Out of 28 midwives, 11 (39.3%) used Moyo continuous only, 3 (10.7%) used Moyo intermittently only and 14 (50.0%) used both intermittent and continuous. Thirteen (46.4%) midwives prefer to use Moyo both intermittent and continuous. Sixteen (55.6%) said Moyo was effective, 21 (75%) felt comfortable to use Moyo, and 13 (46.4%) said Moyo was easy to use.Conclusion: The majority of midwives and women who used Moyo felt that Moyo was comfortable for intrapartum FHR monitoring. Moyo can be used both intermittently and continuously depending on the user’s preferences.Keywords: Moyo, fetal heart rate, labor, midwives, women
format article
author Mdoe P
Yeconia A
Buu F
Kusulla S
Blacy L
Guga G
Mduma E
Kidanto H
author_facet Mdoe P
Yeconia A
Buu F
Kusulla S
Blacy L
Guga G
Mduma E
Kidanto H
author_sort Mdoe P
title Midwives’ and Women’s Perception on Moyo Fetal Heart Rate Monitor for Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring; A Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Midwives’ and Women’s Perception on Moyo Fetal Heart Rate Monitor for Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring; A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Midwives’ and Women’s Perception on Moyo Fetal Heart Rate Monitor for Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring; A Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Midwives’ and Women’s Perception on Moyo Fetal Heart Rate Monitor for Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring; A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Midwives’ and Women’s Perception on Moyo Fetal Heart Rate Monitor for Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring; A Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort midwives’ and women’s perception on moyo fetal heart rate monitor for intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring; a cross-sectional study
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/a2cba282461b4e80a045d0a54bffc7bd
work_keys_str_mv AT mdoep midwivesrsquoandwomenrsquosperceptiononmoyofetalheartratemonitorforintrapartumfetalheartratemonitoringacrosssectionalstudy
AT yeconiaa midwivesrsquoandwomenrsquosperceptiononmoyofetalheartratemonitorforintrapartumfetalheartratemonitoringacrosssectionalstudy
AT buuf midwivesrsquoandwomenrsquosperceptiononmoyofetalheartratemonitorforintrapartumfetalheartratemonitoringacrosssectionalstudy
AT kusullas midwivesrsquoandwomenrsquosperceptiononmoyofetalheartratemonitorforintrapartumfetalheartratemonitoringacrosssectionalstudy
AT blacyl midwivesrsquoandwomenrsquosperceptiononmoyofetalheartratemonitorforintrapartumfetalheartratemonitoringacrosssectionalstudy
AT gugag midwivesrsquoandwomenrsquosperceptiononmoyofetalheartratemonitorforintrapartumfetalheartratemonitoringacrosssectionalstudy
AT mdumae midwivesrsquoandwomenrsquosperceptiononmoyofetalheartratemonitorforintrapartumfetalheartratemonitoringacrosssectionalstudy
AT kidantoh midwivesrsquoandwomenrsquosperceptiononmoyofetalheartratemonitorforintrapartumfetalheartratemonitoringacrosssectionalstudy
_version_ 1718398262371680256