Authentication of Hadith
This book attempts to construct criteria whereby one can validate (reject or accept) Prophetic traditions (hadiths) that are considered questionable. Such an attempt reflects Israr Ahmad Khan’s opinion that many of the hadiths in the canonical Sunni collections, which traditional hadith scholars co...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
International Institute of Islamic Thought
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/a2d90b92b6c045e88c474bc8c8eb8566 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:a2d90b92b6c045e88c474bc8c8eb8566 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:a2d90b92b6c045e88c474bc8c8eb85662021-12-02T17:49:36ZAuthentication of Hadith10.35632/ajis.v27i4.12992690-37332690-3741https://doaj.org/article/a2d90b92b6c045e88c474bc8c8eb85662010-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ajis.org/index.php/ajiss/article/view/1299https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3733https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3741 This book attempts to construct criteria whereby one can validate (reject or accept) Prophetic traditions (hadiths) that are considered questionable. Such an attempt reflects Israr Ahmad Khan’s opinion that many of the hadiths in the canonical Sunni collections, which traditional hadith scholars consider to be authentic, are in fact, not so. Thus, Muslim scholars need to revisit these hadiths and apply a different methodology to demonstrate that they are fabricated. To this end, the author gives different criteria to aid in this sifting ... Ahmed M. HashimInternational Institute of Islamic ThoughtarticleIslamBP1-253ENAmerican Journal of Islam and Society, Vol 27, Iss 4 (2010) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Islam BP1-253 |
spellingShingle |
Islam BP1-253 Ahmed M. Hashim Authentication of Hadith |
description |
This book attempts to construct criteria whereby one can validate (reject or
accept) Prophetic traditions (hadiths) that are considered questionable. Such
an attempt reflects Israr Ahmad Khan’s opinion that many of the hadiths in
the canonical Sunni collections, which traditional hadith scholars consider
to be authentic, are in fact, not so. Thus, Muslim scholars need to revisit
these hadiths and apply a different methodology to demonstrate that they
are fabricated. To this end, the author gives different criteria to aid in this
sifting ...
|
format |
article |
author |
Ahmed M. Hashim |
author_facet |
Ahmed M. Hashim |
author_sort |
Ahmed M. Hashim |
title |
Authentication of Hadith |
title_short |
Authentication of Hadith |
title_full |
Authentication of Hadith |
title_fullStr |
Authentication of Hadith |
title_full_unstemmed |
Authentication of Hadith |
title_sort |
authentication of hadith |
publisher |
International Institute of Islamic Thought |
publishDate |
2010 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/a2d90b92b6c045e88c474bc8c8eb8566 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ahmedmhashim authenticationofhadith |
_version_ |
1718379424980664320 |