Can Dermoscopy Be Used to Predict if a Melanoma Is In Situ or Invasive?

Background: The preoperative prediction of whether melanomas are invasive or in situ can influence initial management. Objectives: This study evaluated the accuracy rate, interobserver concordance, sensitivity and specificity in determining if a melanoma is invasive or in situ, as well as the ab...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sam Polesie, Edvin Jergéus, Martin Gillstedt, Hannah Ceder, Johan Dahlén Gyllencreutz, Julia Fougelberg, Eva Johansson Backman, Jenna Pakka, Oscar Zaar, John Paoli
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Mattioli1885 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a3033fd83e7d4fa390ee6aa30435a0f6
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a3033fd83e7d4fa390ee6aa30435a0f6
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a3033fd83e7d4fa390ee6aa30435a0f62021-11-17T08:27:53ZCan Dermoscopy Be Used to Predict if a Melanoma Is In Situ or Invasive?10.5826/dpc.1103a792160-9381https://doaj.org/article/a3033fd83e7d4fa390ee6aa30435a0f62021-05-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dpcj.org/index.php/dpc/article/view/1567https://doaj.org/toc/2160-9381 Background: The preoperative prediction of whether melanomas are invasive or in situ can influence initial management. Objectives: This study evaluated the accuracy rate, interobserver concordance, sensitivity and specificity in determining if a melanoma is invasive or in situ, as well as the ability to predict invasive melanoma thickness based on clinical and dermoscopic images. Methods: In this retrospective, single-center investigation, 7 dermatologists independently reviewed clinical and dermoscopic images of melanomas to predict if they were invasive or in situ and, if invasive, their Breslow thickness. Fleiss’ and Cohen’s kappa (κ) were used for interobserver concordance and agreement with histopathological diagnosis. Results: We included 184 melanomas (110 invasive and 74 in situ). Diagnostic accuracy ranged from 67.4% to 76.1%. Accuracy rates for in situ and invasive melanomas were 57.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53.1%-61.8%) and 81.7% (95% CI, 78.8%-84.4%), respectively. Interobserver concordance was moderate (κ = 0.47; 95% CI, 0.44-0.51). Sensitivity for predicting invasiveness ranged from 63.6% to 91.8% for 7 observers, while specificity was 32.4%-82.4%. For all correctly predicted invasive melanomas, agreement between predictions and correct thickness over or under 1.0 mm was moderate (κ = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.45-0.58). All invasive melanomas incorrectly predicted by any observer as in situ had a thickness <1.0 mm. All 32 melanomas >1.0 mm were correctly predicted to be invasive by all observers. Conclusions: Accuracy rates for predicting thick melanomas were excellent, melanomas inaccurately predicted as in situ were all thin, and interobserver concordance for predicting in situ or invasive melanomas was moderate. Preoperative dermoscopy of suspected melanomas is recommended for choosing appropriate surgical margins. Sam PolesieEdvin JergéusMartin GillstedtHannah CederJohan Dahlén GyllencreutzJulia FougelbergEva Johansson BackmanJenna PakkaOscar ZaarJohn PaoliMattioli1885articleBreslow thicknessdermoscopymelanomaprojections and predictionsinterobserver variabilityDermatologyRL1-803ENDermatology Practical & Conceptual (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Breslow thickness
dermoscopy
melanoma
projections and predictions
interobserver variability
Dermatology
RL1-803
spellingShingle Breslow thickness
dermoscopy
melanoma
projections and predictions
interobserver variability
Dermatology
RL1-803
Sam Polesie
Edvin Jergéus
Martin Gillstedt
Hannah Ceder
Johan Dahlén Gyllencreutz
Julia Fougelberg
Eva Johansson Backman
Jenna Pakka
Oscar Zaar
John Paoli
Can Dermoscopy Be Used to Predict if a Melanoma Is In Situ or Invasive?
description Background: The preoperative prediction of whether melanomas are invasive or in situ can influence initial management. Objectives: This study evaluated the accuracy rate, interobserver concordance, sensitivity and specificity in determining if a melanoma is invasive or in situ, as well as the ability to predict invasive melanoma thickness based on clinical and dermoscopic images. Methods: In this retrospective, single-center investigation, 7 dermatologists independently reviewed clinical and dermoscopic images of melanomas to predict if they were invasive or in situ and, if invasive, their Breslow thickness. Fleiss’ and Cohen’s kappa (κ) were used for interobserver concordance and agreement with histopathological diagnosis. Results: We included 184 melanomas (110 invasive and 74 in situ). Diagnostic accuracy ranged from 67.4% to 76.1%. Accuracy rates for in situ and invasive melanomas were 57.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53.1%-61.8%) and 81.7% (95% CI, 78.8%-84.4%), respectively. Interobserver concordance was moderate (κ = 0.47; 95% CI, 0.44-0.51). Sensitivity for predicting invasiveness ranged from 63.6% to 91.8% for 7 observers, while specificity was 32.4%-82.4%. For all correctly predicted invasive melanomas, agreement between predictions and correct thickness over or under 1.0 mm was moderate (κ = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.45-0.58). All invasive melanomas incorrectly predicted by any observer as in situ had a thickness <1.0 mm. All 32 melanomas >1.0 mm were correctly predicted to be invasive by all observers. Conclusions: Accuracy rates for predicting thick melanomas were excellent, melanomas inaccurately predicted as in situ were all thin, and interobserver concordance for predicting in situ or invasive melanomas was moderate. Preoperative dermoscopy of suspected melanomas is recommended for choosing appropriate surgical margins.
format article
author Sam Polesie
Edvin Jergéus
Martin Gillstedt
Hannah Ceder
Johan Dahlén Gyllencreutz
Julia Fougelberg
Eva Johansson Backman
Jenna Pakka
Oscar Zaar
John Paoli
author_facet Sam Polesie
Edvin Jergéus
Martin Gillstedt
Hannah Ceder
Johan Dahlén Gyllencreutz
Julia Fougelberg
Eva Johansson Backman
Jenna Pakka
Oscar Zaar
John Paoli
author_sort Sam Polesie
title Can Dermoscopy Be Used to Predict if a Melanoma Is In Situ or Invasive?
title_short Can Dermoscopy Be Used to Predict if a Melanoma Is In Situ or Invasive?
title_full Can Dermoscopy Be Used to Predict if a Melanoma Is In Situ or Invasive?
title_fullStr Can Dermoscopy Be Used to Predict if a Melanoma Is In Situ or Invasive?
title_full_unstemmed Can Dermoscopy Be Used to Predict if a Melanoma Is In Situ or Invasive?
title_sort can dermoscopy be used to predict if a melanoma is in situ or invasive?
publisher Mattioli1885
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/a3033fd83e7d4fa390ee6aa30435a0f6
work_keys_str_mv AT sampolesie candermoscopybeusedtopredictifamelanomaisinsituorinvasive
AT edvinjergeus candermoscopybeusedtopredictifamelanomaisinsituorinvasive
AT martingillstedt candermoscopybeusedtopredictifamelanomaisinsituorinvasive
AT hannahceder candermoscopybeusedtopredictifamelanomaisinsituorinvasive
AT johandahlengyllencreutz candermoscopybeusedtopredictifamelanomaisinsituorinvasive
AT juliafougelberg candermoscopybeusedtopredictifamelanomaisinsituorinvasive
AT evajohanssonbackman candermoscopybeusedtopredictifamelanomaisinsituorinvasive
AT jennapakka candermoscopybeusedtopredictifamelanomaisinsituorinvasive
AT oscarzaar candermoscopybeusedtopredictifamelanomaisinsituorinvasive
AT johnpaoli candermoscopybeusedtopredictifamelanomaisinsituorinvasive
_version_ 1718425815132143616