Fédéralisme et Droits de l’homme aux Etats-Unis

This article studies the Supreme Court’s most recent death penalty jurisprudence, in particular Atkins and Ropers’ in which it ruled mentally retarded and juvenile defendants could no longer be executed. They were seen as victories by the supporters of human rights. This article also focuses on the...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Elisabeth Boulot
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN FR PT
Publicado:	Centre de Recherches sur les Mondes Américains 2008
Materias:	death penalty juveniles lethal injections mentally retarded U.S. Supreme Court Anthropology GN1-890 Latin America. Spanish America F1201-3799
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/a30fc68f502440c2a5b6742a9d7ac689
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:a30fc68f502440c2a5b6742a9d7ac689
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:a30fc68f502440c2a5b6742a9d7ac6892021-12-02T10:40:09ZFédéralisme et Droits de l’homme aux Etats-Unis1626-025210.4000/nuevomundo.33933https://doaj.org/article/a30fc68f502440c2a5b6742a9d7ac6892008-06-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journals.openedition.org/nuevomundo/33933https://doaj.org/toc/1626-0252This article studies the Supreme Court’s most recent death penalty jurisprudence, in particular Atkins and Ropers’ in which it ruled mentally retarded and juvenile defendants could no longer be executed. They were seen as victories by the supporters of human rights. This article also focuses on the impact of federalism in the decision of the United States to keep the death penalty.Elisabeth BoulotCentre de Recherches sur les Mondes Américainsarticledeath penaltyjuvenileslethal injectionsmentally retardedU.S. Supreme CourtAnthropologyGN1-890Latin America. Spanish AmericaF1201-3799ENFRPTNuevo mundo - Mundos Nuevos (2008)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN FR PT
topic	death penalty juveniles lethal injections mentally retarded U.S. Supreme Court Anthropology GN1-890 Latin America. Spanish America F1201-3799
spellingShingle	death penalty juveniles lethal injections mentally retarded U.S. Supreme Court Anthropology GN1-890 Latin America. Spanish America F1201-3799 Elisabeth Boulot Fédéralisme et Droits de l’homme aux Etats-Unis
description	This article studies the Supreme Court’s most recent death penalty jurisprudence, in particular Atkins and Ropers’ in which it ruled mentally retarded and juvenile defendants could no longer be executed. They were seen as victories by the supporters of human rights. This article also focuses on the impact of federalism in the decision of the United States to keep the death penalty.
format	article
author	Elisabeth Boulot
author_facet	Elisabeth Boulot
author_sort	Elisabeth Boulot
title	Fédéralisme et Droits de l’homme aux Etats-Unis
title_short	Fédéralisme et Droits de l’homme aux Etats-Unis
title_full	Fédéralisme et Droits de l’homme aux Etats-Unis
title_fullStr	Fédéralisme et Droits de l’homme aux Etats-Unis
title_full_unstemmed	Fédéralisme et Droits de l’homme aux Etats-Unis
title_sort	fédéralisme et droits de l’homme aux etats-unis
publisher	Centre de Recherches sur les Mondes Américains
publishDate	2008
url	https://doaj.org/article/a30fc68f502440c2a5b6742a9d7ac689
work_keys_str_mv	AT elisabethboulot federalismeetdroitsdelhommeauxetatsunis
_version_	1718396899626582016

Fédéralisme et Droits de l’homme aux Etats-Unis

Ejemplares similares