A Molecular Predictor Reassesses Classification of Human Grade II/III Gliomas.

Diffuse gliomas are incurable brain tumors divided in 3 WHO grades (II; III; IV) based on histological criteria. Grade II/III gliomas are clinically very heterogeneous and their prognosis somewhat unpredictable, preventing definition of appropriate treatment. On a cohort of 65 grade II/III glioma pa...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thierry Rème, Jean-Philippe Hugnot, Ivan Bièche, Valérie Rigau, Fanny Burel-Vandenbos, Vincent Prévot, Marc Baroncini, Denys Fontaine, Hugues Chevassus, Sophie Vacher, Rosette Lidereau, Hugues Duffau, Luc Bauchet, Dominique Joubert
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a31e4d36796544cbbdcb8d9e6e200d7b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a31e4d36796544cbbdcb8d9e6e200d7b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a31e4d36796544cbbdcb8d9e6e200d7b2021-11-18T07:40:39ZA Molecular Predictor Reassesses Classification of Human Grade II/III Gliomas.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0066574https://doaj.org/article/a31e4d36796544cbbdcb8d9e6e200d7b2013-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066574https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Diffuse gliomas are incurable brain tumors divided in 3 WHO grades (II; III; IV) based on histological criteria. Grade II/III gliomas are clinically very heterogeneous and their prognosis somewhat unpredictable, preventing definition of appropriate treatment. On a cohort of 65 grade II/III glioma patients, a QPCR-based approach allowed selection of a biologically relevant gene list from which a gene signature significantly correlated to overall survival was extracted. This signature clustered the training cohort into two classes of low and high risk of progression and death, and similarly clustered two external independent test cohorts of 104 and 73 grade II/III patients. A 22-gene class predictor of the training clusters optimally distinguished poor from good prognosis patients (median survival of 13-20 months versus over 6 years) in the validation cohorts. This classification was stronger at predicting outcome than the WHO grade II/III classification (P≤2.8E-10 versus 0.018). When compared to other prognosis factors (histological subtype and genetic abnormalities) in a multivariate analysis, the 22-gene predictor remained significantly associated with overall survival. Early prediction of high risk patients (3% of WHO grade II), and low risk patients (29% of WHO grade III) in clinical routine will allow the development of more appropriate follow-up and treatments.Thierry RèmeJean-Philippe HugnotIvan BiècheValérie RigauFanny Burel-VandenbosVincent PrévotMarc BaronciniDenys FontaineHugues ChevassusSophie VacherRosette LidereauHugues DuffauLuc BauchetDominique JoubertPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 8, Iss 6, p e66574 (2013)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Thierry Rème
Jean-Philippe Hugnot
Ivan Bièche
Valérie Rigau
Fanny Burel-Vandenbos
Vincent Prévot
Marc Baroncini
Denys Fontaine
Hugues Chevassus
Sophie Vacher
Rosette Lidereau
Hugues Duffau
Luc Bauchet
Dominique Joubert
A Molecular Predictor Reassesses Classification of Human Grade II/III Gliomas.
description Diffuse gliomas are incurable brain tumors divided in 3 WHO grades (II; III; IV) based on histological criteria. Grade II/III gliomas are clinically very heterogeneous and their prognosis somewhat unpredictable, preventing definition of appropriate treatment. On a cohort of 65 grade II/III glioma patients, a QPCR-based approach allowed selection of a biologically relevant gene list from which a gene signature significantly correlated to overall survival was extracted. This signature clustered the training cohort into two classes of low and high risk of progression and death, and similarly clustered two external independent test cohorts of 104 and 73 grade II/III patients. A 22-gene class predictor of the training clusters optimally distinguished poor from good prognosis patients (median survival of 13-20 months versus over 6 years) in the validation cohorts. This classification was stronger at predicting outcome than the WHO grade II/III classification (P≤2.8E-10 versus 0.018). When compared to other prognosis factors (histological subtype and genetic abnormalities) in a multivariate analysis, the 22-gene predictor remained significantly associated with overall survival. Early prediction of high risk patients (3% of WHO grade II), and low risk patients (29% of WHO grade III) in clinical routine will allow the development of more appropriate follow-up and treatments.
format article
author Thierry Rème
Jean-Philippe Hugnot
Ivan Bièche
Valérie Rigau
Fanny Burel-Vandenbos
Vincent Prévot
Marc Baroncini
Denys Fontaine
Hugues Chevassus
Sophie Vacher
Rosette Lidereau
Hugues Duffau
Luc Bauchet
Dominique Joubert
author_facet Thierry Rème
Jean-Philippe Hugnot
Ivan Bièche
Valérie Rigau
Fanny Burel-Vandenbos
Vincent Prévot
Marc Baroncini
Denys Fontaine
Hugues Chevassus
Sophie Vacher
Rosette Lidereau
Hugues Duffau
Luc Bauchet
Dominique Joubert
author_sort Thierry Rème
title A Molecular Predictor Reassesses Classification of Human Grade II/III Gliomas.
title_short A Molecular Predictor Reassesses Classification of Human Grade II/III Gliomas.
title_full A Molecular Predictor Reassesses Classification of Human Grade II/III Gliomas.
title_fullStr A Molecular Predictor Reassesses Classification of Human Grade II/III Gliomas.
title_full_unstemmed A Molecular Predictor Reassesses Classification of Human Grade II/III Gliomas.
title_sort molecular predictor reassesses classification of human grade ii/iii gliomas.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2013
url https://doaj.org/article/a31e4d36796544cbbdcb8d9e6e200d7b
work_keys_str_mv AT thierryreme amolecularpredictorreassessesclassificationofhumangradeiiiiigliomas
AT jeanphilippehugnot amolecularpredictorreassessesclassificationofhumangradeiiiiigliomas
AT ivanbieche amolecularpredictorreassessesclassificationofhumangradeiiiiigliomas
AT valerierigau amolecularpredictorreassessesclassificationofhumangradeiiiiigliomas
AT fannyburelvandenbos amolecularpredictorreassessesclassificationofhumangradeiiiiigliomas
AT vincentprevot amolecularpredictorreassessesclassificationofhumangradeiiiiigliomas
AT marcbaroncini amolecularpredictorreassessesclassificationofhumangradeiiiiigliomas
AT denysfontaine amolecularpredictorreassessesclassificationofhumangradeiiiiigliomas
AT hugueschevassus amolecularpredictorreassessesclassificationofhumangradeiiiiigliomas
AT sophievacher amolecularpredictorreassessesclassificationofhumangradeiiiiigliomas
AT rosettelidereau amolecularpredictorreassessesclassificationofhumangradeiiiiigliomas
AT huguesduffau amolecularpredictorreassessesclassificationofhumangradeiiiiigliomas
AT lucbauchet amolecularpredictorreassessesclassificationofhumangradeiiiiigliomas
AT dominiquejoubert amolecularpredictorreassessesclassificationofhumangradeiiiiigliomas
AT thierryreme molecularpredictorreassessesclassificationofhumangradeiiiiigliomas
AT jeanphilippehugnot molecularpredictorreassessesclassificationofhumangradeiiiiigliomas
AT ivanbieche molecularpredictorreassessesclassificationofhumangradeiiiiigliomas
AT valerierigau molecularpredictorreassessesclassificationofhumangradeiiiiigliomas
AT fannyburelvandenbos molecularpredictorreassessesclassificationofhumangradeiiiiigliomas
AT vincentprevot molecularpredictorreassessesclassificationofhumangradeiiiiigliomas
AT marcbaroncini molecularpredictorreassessesclassificationofhumangradeiiiiigliomas
AT denysfontaine molecularpredictorreassessesclassificationofhumangradeiiiiigliomas
AT hugueschevassus molecularpredictorreassessesclassificationofhumangradeiiiiigliomas
AT sophievacher molecularpredictorreassessesclassificationofhumangradeiiiiigliomas
AT rosettelidereau molecularpredictorreassessesclassificationofhumangradeiiiiigliomas
AT huguesduffau molecularpredictorreassessesclassificationofhumangradeiiiiigliomas
AT lucbauchet molecularpredictorreassessesclassificationofhumangradeiiiiigliomas
AT dominiquejoubert molecularpredictorreassessesclassificationofhumangradeiiiiigliomas
_version_ 1718423116358615040