Comparison of three magnetic nanoparticle tracers for sentinel lymph node biopsy in an in vivo porcine model

Joost J Pouw,1,* Muneer Ahmed,2,* Bauke Anninga,2 Kimberley Schuurman,1 Sarah E Pinder,2 Mieke Van Hemelrijck,3 Quentin A Pankhurst,4,5 Michael Douek,2 Bennie ten Haken1 1MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands; 2Research Onco...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pouw JJ, Ahmed M, Anninga B, Schuurman K, Pinder SE, Van Hemelrijck M, Pankhurst QA, Douek M, ten Haken B
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a3262dc8709940ebbe0c978a8aee58d9
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a3262dc8709940ebbe0c978a8aee58d9
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a3262dc8709940ebbe0c978a8aee58d92021-12-02T00:37:18ZComparison of three magnetic nanoparticle tracers for sentinel lymph node biopsy in an in vivo porcine model1178-2013https://doaj.org/article/a3262dc8709940ebbe0c978a8aee58d92015-02-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-three-magnetic-nanoparticle-tracers-for-sentinel-lymph-n-peer-reviewed-article-IJNhttps://doaj.org/toc/1178-2013 Joost J Pouw,1,* Muneer Ahmed,2,* Bauke Anninga,2 Kimberley Schuurman,1 Sarah E Pinder,2 Mieke Van Hemelrijck,3 Quentin A Pankhurst,4,5 Michael Douek,2 Bennie ten Haken1 1MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands; 2Research Oncology, Division of Cancer Studies, King’s College London, Guy’s Hospital, London, UK; 3Cancer Epidemiology Group, Division of Cancer Studies, King’s College London, London, UK; 4Healthcare Biomagnetics Laboratory, University College London, London, UK; 5Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK *These authors contributed equally to this work Introduction: Breast cancer staging with sentinel lymph node biopsy relies on the use of radioisotopes, which limits the availability of the procedure worldwide. The use of a magnetic nanoparticle tracer and a handheld magnetometer provides a radiation-free alternative, which was recently evaluated in two clinical trials. The hydrodynamic particle size of the used magnetic tracer differs substantially from the radioisotope tracer and could therefore benefit from optimization. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of three different-sized magnetic nanoparticle tracers for sentinel lymph node biopsy within an in vivo porcine model.Materials and methods: Sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed within a validated porcine model using three magnetic nanoparticle tracers, approved for use in humans (ferumoxytol, with hydrodynamic diameter dH =32 nm; Sienna+®, dH =59 nm; and ferumoxide, dH =111 nm), and a handheld magnetometer. Magnetometer counts (transcutaneous and ex vivo), iron quantification (vibrating sample magnetometry), and histopathological assessments were performed on all ex vivo nodes.Results: Transcutaneous “hotspots” were present in 12/12 cases within 30 minutes of injection for the 59 nm tracer, compared to 7/12 for the 32 nm tracer and 8/12 for the 111 nm tracer, at the same time point. Ex vivo magnetometer counts were significantly greater for the 59 nm tracer than for the other tracers. Significantly more nodes per basin were excised for the 32 nm tracer compared to other tracers, indicating poor retention of the 32 nm tracer. Using the 59 nm tracer resulted in a significantly higher iron accumulation compared to the 32 nm tracer.Conclusion: The 59 nm tracer demonstrated rapid lymphatic uptake, retention in the first nodes reached, and accumulation in high concentration, making it the most suitable tracer for intraoperative sentinel lymph node localization. Keywords: superparamagnetic iron oxide, breast cancer, magnetic tracer, ferumoxytol, ferumoxide, Sienna+®Pouw JJAhmed MAnninga BSchuurman KPinder SEVan Hemelrijck MPankhurst QADouek Mten Haken BDove Medical PressarticleMedicine (General)R5-920ENInternational Journal of Nanomedicine, Vol 2015, Iss default, Pp 1235-1243 (2015)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle Medicine (General)
R5-920
Pouw JJ
Ahmed M
Anninga B
Schuurman K
Pinder SE
Van Hemelrijck M
Pankhurst QA
Douek M
ten Haken B
Comparison of three magnetic nanoparticle tracers for sentinel lymph node biopsy in an in vivo porcine model
description Joost J Pouw,1,* Muneer Ahmed,2,* Bauke Anninga,2 Kimberley Schuurman,1 Sarah E Pinder,2 Mieke Van Hemelrijck,3 Quentin A Pankhurst,4,5 Michael Douek,2 Bennie ten Haken1 1MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands; 2Research Oncology, Division of Cancer Studies, King’s College London, Guy’s Hospital, London, UK; 3Cancer Epidemiology Group, Division of Cancer Studies, King’s College London, London, UK; 4Healthcare Biomagnetics Laboratory, University College London, London, UK; 5Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK *These authors contributed equally to this work Introduction: Breast cancer staging with sentinel lymph node biopsy relies on the use of radioisotopes, which limits the availability of the procedure worldwide. The use of a magnetic nanoparticle tracer and a handheld magnetometer provides a radiation-free alternative, which was recently evaluated in two clinical trials. The hydrodynamic particle size of the used magnetic tracer differs substantially from the radioisotope tracer and could therefore benefit from optimization. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of three different-sized magnetic nanoparticle tracers for sentinel lymph node biopsy within an in vivo porcine model.Materials and methods: Sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed within a validated porcine model using three magnetic nanoparticle tracers, approved for use in humans (ferumoxytol, with hydrodynamic diameter dH =32 nm; Sienna+®, dH =59 nm; and ferumoxide, dH =111 nm), and a handheld magnetometer. Magnetometer counts (transcutaneous and ex vivo), iron quantification (vibrating sample magnetometry), and histopathological assessments were performed on all ex vivo nodes.Results: Transcutaneous “hotspots” were present in 12/12 cases within 30 minutes of injection for the 59 nm tracer, compared to 7/12 for the 32 nm tracer and 8/12 for the 111 nm tracer, at the same time point. Ex vivo magnetometer counts were significantly greater for the 59 nm tracer than for the other tracers. Significantly more nodes per basin were excised for the 32 nm tracer compared to other tracers, indicating poor retention of the 32 nm tracer. Using the 59 nm tracer resulted in a significantly higher iron accumulation compared to the 32 nm tracer.Conclusion: The 59 nm tracer demonstrated rapid lymphatic uptake, retention in the first nodes reached, and accumulation in high concentration, making it the most suitable tracer for intraoperative sentinel lymph node localization. Keywords: superparamagnetic iron oxide, breast cancer, magnetic tracer, ferumoxytol, ferumoxide, Sienna+®
format article
author Pouw JJ
Ahmed M
Anninga B
Schuurman K
Pinder SE
Van Hemelrijck M
Pankhurst QA
Douek M
ten Haken B
author_facet Pouw JJ
Ahmed M
Anninga B
Schuurman K
Pinder SE
Van Hemelrijck M
Pankhurst QA
Douek M
ten Haken B
author_sort Pouw JJ
title Comparison of three magnetic nanoparticle tracers for sentinel lymph node biopsy in an in vivo porcine model
title_short Comparison of three magnetic nanoparticle tracers for sentinel lymph node biopsy in an in vivo porcine model
title_full Comparison of three magnetic nanoparticle tracers for sentinel lymph node biopsy in an in vivo porcine model
title_fullStr Comparison of three magnetic nanoparticle tracers for sentinel lymph node biopsy in an in vivo porcine model
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of three magnetic nanoparticle tracers for sentinel lymph node biopsy in an in vivo porcine model
title_sort comparison of three magnetic nanoparticle tracers for sentinel lymph node biopsy in an in vivo porcine model
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2015
url https://doaj.org/article/a3262dc8709940ebbe0c978a8aee58d9
work_keys_str_mv AT pouwjj comparisonofthreemagneticnanoparticletracersforsentinellymphnodebiopsyinaninnbspvivoporcinemodel
AT ahmedm comparisonofthreemagneticnanoparticletracersforsentinellymphnodebiopsyinaninnbspvivoporcinemodel
AT anningab comparisonofthreemagneticnanoparticletracersforsentinellymphnodebiopsyinaninnbspvivoporcinemodel
AT schuurmank comparisonofthreemagneticnanoparticletracersforsentinellymphnodebiopsyinaninnbspvivoporcinemodel
AT pinderse comparisonofthreemagneticnanoparticletracersforsentinellymphnodebiopsyinaninnbspvivoporcinemodel
AT vanhemelrijckm comparisonofthreemagneticnanoparticletracersforsentinellymphnodebiopsyinaninnbspvivoporcinemodel
AT pankhurstqa comparisonofthreemagneticnanoparticletracersforsentinellymphnodebiopsyinaninnbspvivoporcinemodel
AT douekm comparisonofthreemagneticnanoparticletracersforsentinellymphnodebiopsyinaninnbspvivoporcinemodel
AT tenhakenb comparisonofthreemagneticnanoparticletracersforsentinellymphnodebiopsyinaninnbspvivoporcinemodel
_version_ 1718403637061877760