Dimensioning of Elastic Adhesive Joints with Complex Geometries? – A Systematic Approach beyond ETAG 002

The current European standard for dimensioning silicone adhesive joints in structural glazing applications is defined in the ETAG 002. Although there are several decades of field experience with this standard it still has some major limitations and mainly uses an empirical concept based on an avera...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Thomas Scherer, Wolfgang Wittwer, Christian Scherer, Ernst Semar
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Challenging Glass Conference 2018
Materias:	ETAG 002 glass joint dimensioning silicone hyperelastic adhesive Clay industries. Ceramics. Glass TP785-869
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/a366d19fd43f415a82def4f83a9d2514
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:a366d19fd43f415a82def4f83a9d2514
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:a366d19fd43f415a82def4f83a9d25142021-12-04T05:12:13ZDimensioning of Elastic Adhesive Joints with Complex Geometries? – A Systematic Approach beyond ETAG 00210.7480/cgc.6.21602589-8019https://doaj.org/article/a366d19fd43f415a82def4f83a9d25142018-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://proceedings.challengingglass.com/index.php/cgc/article/view/128https://doaj.org/toc/2589-8019 The current European standard for dimensioning silicone adhesive joints in structural glazing applications is defined in the ETAG 002. Although there are several decades of field experience with this standard it still has some major limitations and mainly uses an empirical concept based on an average force by area tension engineering approach. In addition there are a number of other restrictions for example the limitation of specific substrates and rectangular shaped joints with defined aspect ratios as well as the exclusion of joints with non-coplanar surfaces. The presented investigations are based on a combined numerical and experimental concept and demonstrate that appropriately designed elastic adhesive joints with complex geometries excluded by common standards can be evaluated and validated in a systematic and reliable way. The experimental test may easily be combined with well-established and proven aging test schemes, for which long-term reliable field experience is available. In addition any desired safety factor can be added. Thomas SchererWolfgang WittwerChristian SchererErnst SemarChallenging Glass ConferencearticleETAG 002glass joint dimensioningsiliconehyperelastic adhesiveClay industries. Ceramics. GlassTP785-869ENChallenging Glass Conference Proceedings, Vol 6, Iss 1 (2018)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	ETAG 002 glass joint dimensioning silicone hyperelastic adhesive Clay industries. Ceramics. Glass TP785-869
spellingShingle	ETAG 002 glass joint dimensioning silicone hyperelastic adhesive Clay industries. Ceramics. Glass TP785-869 Thomas Scherer Wolfgang Wittwer Christian Scherer Ernst Semar Dimensioning of Elastic Adhesive Joints with Complex Geometries? – A Systematic Approach beyond ETAG 002
description	The current European standard for dimensioning silicone adhesive joints in structural glazing applications is defined in the ETAG 002. Although there are several decades of field experience with this standard it still has some major limitations and mainly uses an empirical concept based on an average force by area tension engineering approach. In addition there are a number of other restrictions for example the limitation of specific substrates and rectangular shaped joints with defined aspect ratios as well as the exclusion of joints with non-coplanar surfaces. The presented investigations are based on a combined numerical and experimental concept and demonstrate that appropriately designed elastic adhesive joints with complex geometries excluded by common standards can be evaluated and validated in a systematic and reliable way. The experimental test may easily be combined with well-established and proven aging test schemes, for which long-term reliable field experience is available. In addition any desired safety factor can be added.
format	article
author	Thomas Scherer Wolfgang Wittwer Christian Scherer Ernst Semar
author_facet	Thomas Scherer Wolfgang Wittwer Christian Scherer Ernst Semar
author_sort	Thomas Scherer
title	Dimensioning of Elastic Adhesive Joints with Complex Geometries? – A Systematic Approach beyond ETAG 002
title_short	Dimensioning of Elastic Adhesive Joints with Complex Geometries? – A Systematic Approach beyond ETAG 002
title_full	Dimensioning of Elastic Adhesive Joints with Complex Geometries? – A Systematic Approach beyond ETAG 002
title_fullStr	Dimensioning of Elastic Adhesive Joints with Complex Geometries? – A Systematic Approach beyond ETAG 002
title_full_unstemmed	Dimensioning of Elastic Adhesive Joints with Complex Geometries? – A Systematic Approach beyond ETAG 002
title_sort	dimensioning of elastic adhesive joints with complex geometries? – a systematic approach beyond etag 002
publisher	Challenging Glass Conference
publishDate	2018
url	https://doaj.org/article/a366d19fd43f415a82def4f83a9d2514
work_keys_str_mv	AT thomasscherer dimensioningofelasticadhesivejointswithcomplexgeometriesasystematicapproachbeyondetag002 AT wolfgangwittwer dimensioningofelasticadhesivejointswithcomplexgeometriesasystematicapproachbeyondetag002 AT christianscherer dimensioningofelasticadhesivejointswithcomplexgeometriesasystematicapproachbeyondetag002 AT ernstsemar dimensioningofelasticadhesivejointswithcomplexgeometriesasystematicapproachbeyondetag002
_version_	1718372871808483328

Dimensioning of Elastic Adhesive Joints with Complex Geometries? – A Systematic Approach beyond ETAG 002

Ejemplares similares