A comparative examination of MBR and SBR performance for municipal wastewater treatment
In this study, the performance of the membrane bioreactor (MBR) and anoxic–aerobic sequencing batch reactor (SBR) are compared in treating municipal wastewater. The aim of the work was to determine the feasibility of these systems for the removal of organics matter and nutriments from the municipal...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
IWA Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/a39161a7a77d45b392591b21040b253a |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:a39161a7a77d45b392591b21040b253a |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:a39161a7a77d45b392591b21040b253a2021-11-05T21:09:33ZA comparative examination of MBR and SBR performance for municipal wastewater treatment1751-231X10.2166/wpt.2021.016https://doaj.org/article/a39161a7a77d45b392591b21040b253a2021-04-01T00:00:00Zhttp://wpt.iwaponline.com/content/16/2/582https://doaj.org/toc/1751-231XIn this study, the performance of the membrane bioreactor (MBR) and anoxic–aerobic sequencing batch reactor (SBR) are compared in treating municipal wastewater. The aim of the work was to determine the feasibility of these systems for the removal of organics matter and nutriments from the municipal wastewater. The MBR displayed a superior performance with removal efficiencies exceeding 99% for TSS, 94% for chemical oxygen demand (COD) and an improvement on SBR efficiencies was found. In the same way, the MBR produced an effluent with much better quality than SBR in terms of total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) removal efficiencies. Combining membrane separation and biodegradation processes or the membrane bioreactor (MBR) technology improved pollution removal efficiencies significantly. Highlights Municipal wastewater treatment.; Membrane bioreactor process.; SBR process evaluation.; Organic pollution removal.; Reuse in irrigation.;S. KitanouH. AyyoubJ. TouirA. ZdegS. BenabdallahM. TakyA. ElmidaouiIWA Publishingarticlemembrane bioreactor (mbr)municipal wastewater treatmentsequencing batch reactor (sbr)Environmental technology. Sanitary engineeringTD1-1066ENWater Practice and Technology, Vol 16, Iss 2, Pp 582-591 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
membrane bioreactor (mbr) municipal wastewater treatment sequencing batch reactor (sbr) Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering TD1-1066 |
spellingShingle |
membrane bioreactor (mbr) municipal wastewater treatment sequencing batch reactor (sbr) Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering TD1-1066 S. Kitanou H. Ayyoub J. Touir A. Zdeg S. Benabdallah M. Taky A. Elmidaoui A comparative examination of MBR and SBR performance for municipal wastewater treatment |
description |
In this study, the performance of the membrane bioreactor (MBR) and anoxic–aerobic sequencing batch reactor (SBR) are compared in treating municipal wastewater. The aim of the work was to determine the feasibility of these systems for the removal of organics matter and nutriments from the municipal wastewater. The MBR displayed a superior performance with removal efficiencies exceeding 99% for TSS, 94% for chemical oxygen demand (COD) and an improvement on SBR efficiencies was found. In the same way, the MBR produced an effluent with much better quality than SBR in terms of total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) removal efficiencies. Combining membrane separation and biodegradation processes or the membrane bioreactor (MBR) technology improved pollution removal efficiencies significantly. Highlights
Municipal wastewater treatment.;
Membrane bioreactor process.;
SBR process evaluation.;
Organic pollution removal.;
Reuse in irrigation.; |
format |
article |
author |
S. Kitanou H. Ayyoub J. Touir A. Zdeg S. Benabdallah M. Taky A. Elmidaoui |
author_facet |
S. Kitanou H. Ayyoub J. Touir A. Zdeg S. Benabdallah M. Taky A. Elmidaoui |
author_sort |
S. Kitanou |
title |
A comparative examination of MBR and SBR performance for municipal wastewater treatment |
title_short |
A comparative examination of MBR and SBR performance for municipal wastewater treatment |
title_full |
A comparative examination of MBR and SBR performance for municipal wastewater treatment |
title_fullStr |
A comparative examination of MBR and SBR performance for municipal wastewater treatment |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparative examination of MBR and SBR performance for municipal wastewater treatment |
title_sort |
comparative examination of mbr and sbr performance for municipal wastewater treatment |
publisher |
IWA Publishing |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/a39161a7a77d45b392591b21040b253a |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT skitanou acomparativeexaminationofmbrandsbrperformanceformunicipalwastewatertreatment AT hayyoub acomparativeexaminationofmbrandsbrperformanceformunicipalwastewatertreatment AT jtouir acomparativeexaminationofmbrandsbrperformanceformunicipalwastewatertreatment AT azdeg acomparativeexaminationofmbrandsbrperformanceformunicipalwastewatertreatment AT sbenabdallah acomparativeexaminationofmbrandsbrperformanceformunicipalwastewatertreatment AT mtaky acomparativeexaminationofmbrandsbrperformanceformunicipalwastewatertreatment AT aelmidaoui acomparativeexaminationofmbrandsbrperformanceformunicipalwastewatertreatment AT skitanou comparativeexaminationofmbrandsbrperformanceformunicipalwastewatertreatment AT hayyoub comparativeexaminationofmbrandsbrperformanceformunicipalwastewatertreatment AT jtouir comparativeexaminationofmbrandsbrperformanceformunicipalwastewatertreatment AT azdeg comparativeexaminationofmbrandsbrperformanceformunicipalwastewatertreatment AT sbenabdallah comparativeexaminationofmbrandsbrperformanceformunicipalwastewatertreatment AT mtaky comparativeexaminationofmbrandsbrperformanceformunicipalwastewatertreatment AT aelmidaoui comparativeexaminationofmbrandsbrperformanceformunicipalwastewatertreatment |
_version_ |
1718444054901948416 |