Quantitative Analysis of the Trends Exhibited by the Three Interdisciplinary Biological Sciences: Biophysics, Bioinformatics, and Systems Biology

New interdisciplinary biological sciences like bioinformatics, biophysics, and systems biology have become increasingly relevant in modern science. Many papers have suggested the importance of adding these subjects, particularly bioinformatics, to an undergraduate curriculum; however, most of their...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jonghoon Kang, Seyeon Park, Aarya Venkat, Adarsh Gopinath
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a3a45107861444b3b3536de76f0e1e1d
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a3a45107861444b3b3536de76f0e1e1d
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a3a45107861444b3b3536de76f0e1e1d2021-11-15T15:04:03ZQuantitative Analysis of the Trends Exhibited by the Three Interdisciplinary Biological Sciences: Biophysics, Bioinformatics, and Systems Biology10.1128/jmbe.v16i2.9491935-78851935-7877https://doaj.org/article/a3a45107861444b3b3536de76f0e1e1d2015-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jmbe.v16i2.949https://doaj.org/toc/1935-7877https://doaj.org/toc/1935-7885New interdisciplinary biological sciences like bioinformatics, biophysics, and systems biology have become increasingly relevant in modern science. Many papers have suggested the importance of adding these subjects, particularly bioinformatics, to an undergraduate curriculum; however, most of their assertions have relied on qualitative arguments. In this paper, we will show our metadata analysis of a scientific literature database (PubMed) that quantitatively describes the importance of the subjects of bioinformatics, systems biology, and biophysics as compared with a well-established interdisciplinary subject, biochemistry. Specifically, we found that the development of each subject assessed by its publication volume was well described by a set of simple nonlinear equations, allowing us to characterize them quantitatively. Bioinformatics, which had the highest ratio of publications produced, was predicted to grow between 77% and 93% by 2025 according to the model. Due to the large number of publications produced in bioinformatics, which nearly matches the number published in biochemistry, it can be inferred that bioinformatics is almost equal in significance to biochemistry. Based on our analysis, we suggest that bioinformatics be added to the standard biology undergraduate curriculum. Adding this course to an undergraduate curriculum will better prepare students for future research in biology.Jonghoon KangSeyeon ParkAarya VenkatAdarsh GopinathAmerican Society for MicrobiologyarticleSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691Biology (General)QH301-705.5ENJournal of Microbiology & Biology Education, Vol 16, Iss 2, Pp 198-202 (2015)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
spellingShingle Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Jonghoon Kang
Seyeon Park
Aarya Venkat
Adarsh Gopinath
Quantitative Analysis of the Trends Exhibited by the Three Interdisciplinary Biological Sciences: Biophysics, Bioinformatics, and Systems Biology
description New interdisciplinary biological sciences like bioinformatics, biophysics, and systems biology have become increasingly relevant in modern science. Many papers have suggested the importance of adding these subjects, particularly bioinformatics, to an undergraduate curriculum; however, most of their assertions have relied on qualitative arguments. In this paper, we will show our metadata analysis of a scientific literature database (PubMed) that quantitatively describes the importance of the subjects of bioinformatics, systems biology, and biophysics as compared with a well-established interdisciplinary subject, biochemistry. Specifically, we found that the development of each subject assessed by its publication volume was well described by a set of simple nonlinear equations, allowing us to characterize them quantitatively. Bioinformatics, which had the highest ratio of publications produced, was predicted to grow between 77% and 93% by 2025 according to the model. Due to the large number of publications produced in bioinformatics, which nearly matches the number published in biochemistry, it can be inferred that bioinformatics is almost equal in significance to biochemistry. Based on our analysis, we suggest that bioinformatics be added to the standard biology undergraduate curriculum. Adding this course to an undergraduate curriculum will better prepare students for future research in biology.
format article
author Jonghoon Kang
Seyeon Park
Aarya Venkat
Adarsh Gopinath
author_facet Jonghoon Kang
Seyeon Park
Aarya Venkat
Adarsh Gopinath
author_sort Jonghoon Kang
title Quantitative Analysis of the Trends Exhibited by the Three Interdisciplinary Biological Sciences: Biophysics, Bioinformatics, and Systems Biology
title_short Quantitative Analysis of the Trends Exhibited by the Three Interdisciplinary Biological Sciences: Biophysics, Bioinformatics, and Systems Biology
title_full Quantitative Analysis of the Trends Exhibited by the Three Interdisciplinary Biological Sciences: Biophysics, Bioinformatics, and Systems Biology
title_fullStr Quantitative Analysis of the Trends Exhibited by the Three Interdisciplinary Biological Sciences: Biophysics, Bioinformatics, and Systems Biology
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative Analysis of the Trends Exhibited by the Three Interdisciplinary Biological Sciences: Biophysics, Bioinformatics, and Systems Biology
title_sort quantitative analysis of the trends exhibited by the three interdisciplinary biological sciences: biophysics, bioinformatics, and systems biology
publisher American Society for Microbiology
publishDate 2015
url https://doaj.org/article/a3a45107861444b3b3536de76f0e1e1d
work_keys_str_mv AT jonghoonkang quantitativeanalysisofthetrendsexhibitedbythethreeinterdisciplinarybiologicalsciencesbiophysicsbioinformaticsandsystemsbiology
AT seyeonpark quantitativeanalysisofthetrendsexhibitedbythethreeinterdisciplinarybiologicalsciencesbiophysicsbioinformaticsandsystemsbiology
AT aaryavenkat quantitativeanalysisofthetrendsexhibitedbythethreeinterdisciplinarybiologicalsciencesbiophysicsbioinformaticsandsystemsbiology
AT adarshgopinath quantitativeanalysisofthetrendsexhibitedbythethreeinterdisciplinarybiologicalsciencesbiophysicsbioinformaticsandsystemsbiology
_version_ 1718428331998707712