Efficacy and Safety of Vacuum-Assisted Excision for Benign Breast Mass Lesion: A Meta-Analysis

<i>Background and Objective</i>: Breast mass lesions are common; however, determining the malignant potential of the lesion can be ambiguous. Recently, to evaluate breast mass lesions, vacuum-assisted excision (VAE) biopsy has been widely used for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Hee-Seon Yoo, Wu-Seong Kang, Jung-Soo Pyo, Junghan Yoon
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	MDPI AG 2021
Materias:	breast mass vacuum assisted excision meta-analysis systematic review Medicine (General) R5-920
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/a3d02e4284c849c4b328a3379073372c
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:a3d02e4284c849c4b328a3379073372c
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:a3d02e4284c849c4b328a3379073372c2021-11-25T18:19:02ZEfficacy and Safety of Vacuum-Assisted Excision for Benign Breast Mass Lesion: A Meta-Analysis10.3390/medicina571112601648-91441010-660Xhttps://doaj.org/article/a3d02e4284c849c4b328a3379073372c2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/57/11/1260https://doaj.org/toc/1010-660Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/1648-9144<i>Background and Objective</i>: Breast mass lesions are common; however, determining the malignant potential of the lesion can be ambiguous. Recently, to evaluate breast mass lesions, vacuum-assisted excision (VAE) biopsy has been widely used for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic role of VAE. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: Relevant articles were obtained by searching PubMed and EMBASE on 3 September 2021. Meta-analyses were performed using odds ratios and proportions. To assess heterogeneity, we conducted a subgroup analysis and meta-regression tests. <i>Results</i>: Finally, 26 studies comprising 18,170 patients were included. All of these were observational studies. The meta-analysis showed that the complete resection rate of VAE was 0.930. In the meta-regression test, there was no significant difference. The meta-analysis showed a recurrence rate of 0.039 in the VAE group. The meta-regression test showed no statistical significance. Postoperative hematoma, pain, and ecchymosis after VAE were 0.092, 0.082, and 0.075, respectively. <i>Conclusion</i>: VAE for benign breast lesions showed favorable outcomes with respect to complete resection and complications. This meta-analysis suggested that VAE for low-risk benign breast lesions is a reasonable option for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes.Hee-Seon YooWu-Seong KangJung-Soo PyoJunghan YoonMDPI AGarticlebreast massvacuum assisted excisionmeta-analysissystematic reviewMedicine (General)R5-920ENMedicina, Vol 57, Iss 1260, p 1260 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	breast mass vacuum assisted excision meta-analysis systematic review Medicine (General) R5-920
spellingShingle	breast mass vacuum assisted excision meta-analysis systematic review Medicine (General) R5-920 Hee-Seon Yoo Wu-Seong Kang Jung-Soo Pyo Junghan Yoon Efficacy and Safety of Vacuum-Assisted Excision for Benign Breast Mass Lesion: A Meta-Analysis
description	<i>Background and Objective</i>: Breast mass lesions are common; however, determining the malignant potential of the lesion can be ambiguous. Recently, to evaluate breast mass lesions, vacuum-assisted excision (VAE) biopsy has been widely used for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic role of VAE. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: Relevant articles were obtained by searching PubMed and EMBASE on 3 September 2021. Meta-analyses were performed using odds ratios and proportions. To assess heterogeneity, we conducted a subgroup analysis and meta-regression tests. <i>Results</i>: Finally, 26 studies comprising 18,170 patients were included. All of these were observational studies. The meta-analysis showed that the complete resection rate of VAE was 0.930. In the meta-regression test, there was no significant difference. The meta-analysis showed a recurrence rate of 0.039 in the VAE group. The meta-regression test showed no statistical significance. Postoperative hematoma, pain, and ecchymosis after VAE were 0.092, 0.082, and 0.075, respectively. <i>Conclusion</i>: VAE for benign breast lesions showed favorable outcomes with respect to complete resection and complications. This meta-analysis suggested that VAE for low-risk benign breast lesions is a reasonable option for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes.
format	article
author	Hee-Seon Yoo Wu-Seong Kang Jung-Soo Pyo Junghan Yoon
author_facet	Hee-Seon Yoo Wu-Seong Kang Jung-Soo Pyo Junghan Yoon
author_sort	Hee-Seon Yoo
title	Efficacy and Safety of Vacuum-Assisted Excision for Benign Breast Mass Lesion: A Meta-Analysis
title_short	Efficacy and Safety of Vacuum-Assisted Excision for Benign Breast Mass Lesion: A Meta-Analysis
title_full	Efficacy and Safety of Vacuum-Assisted Excision for Benign Breast Mass Lesion: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr	Efficacy and Safety of Vacuum-Assisted Excision for Benign Breast Mass Lesion: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed	Efficacy and Safety of Vacuum-Assisted Excision for Benign Breast Mass Lesion: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort	efficacy and safety of vacuum-assisted excision for benign breast mass lesion: a meta-analysis
publisher	MDPI AG
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/a3d02e4284c849c4b328a3379073372c
work_keys_str_mv	AT heeseonyoo efficacyandsafetyofvacuumassistedexcisionforbenignbreastmasslesionametaanalysis AT wuseongkang efficacyandsafetyofvacuumassistedexcisionforbenignbreastmasslesionametaanalysis AT jungsoopyo efficacyandsafetyofvacuumassistedexcisionforbenignbreastmasslesionametaanalysis AT junghanyoon efficacyandsafetyofvacuumassistedexcisionforbenignbreastmasslesionametaanalysis
_version_	1718411337093087232

Efficacy and Safety of Vacuum-Assisted Excision for Benign Breast Mass Lesion: A Meta-Analysis

Ejemplares similares