Perceptions of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage in different policy scenarios

It is not clear how the public views the acceptability of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS). Here the authors explored public perceptions of BECCS by situating the technology in three policy scenarios and found that the policy instrument used to incentivise BECCS significantly affect...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Rob Bellamy, Javier Lezaun, James Palmer
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2019
Materias:	Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/a42a19d613f24fb7ab1c8870fe3442da
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:a42a19d613f24fb7ab1c8870fe3442da
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:a42a19d613f24fb7ab1c8870fe3442da2021-12-02T17:33:23ZPerceptions of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage in different policy scenarios10.1038/s41467-019-08592-52041-1723https://doaj.org/article/a42a19d613f24fb7ab1c8870fe3442da2019-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08592-5https://doaj.org/toc/2041-1723It is not clear how the public views the acceptability of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS). Here the authors explored public perceptions of BECCS by situating the technology in three policy scenarios and found that the policy instrument used to incentivise BECCS significantly affects the degree of public support for the technology.Rob BellamyJavier LezaunJames PalmerNature PortfolioarticleScienceQENNature Communications, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2019)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Science Q
spellingShingle	Science Q Rob Bellamy Javier Lezaun James Palmer Perceptions of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage in different policy scenarios
description	It is not clear how the public views the acceptability of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS). Here the authors explored public perceptions of BECCS by situating the technology in three policy scenarios and found that the policy instrument used to incentivise BECCS significantly affects the degree of public support for the technology.
format	article
author	Rob Bellamy Javier Lezaun James Palmer
author_facet	Rob Bellamy Javier Lezaun James Palmer
author_sort	Rob Bellamy
title	Perceptions of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage in different policy scenarios
title_short	Perceptions of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage in different policy scenarios
title_full	Perceptions of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage in different policy scenarios
title_fullStr	Perceptions of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage in different policy scenarios
title_full_unstemmed	Perceptions of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage in different policy scenarios
title_sort	perceptions of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage in different policy scenarios
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2019
url	https://doaj.org/article/a42a19d613f24fb7ab1c8870fe3442da
work_keys_str_mv	AT robbellamy perceptionsofbioenergywithcarboncaptureandstorageindifferentpolicyscenarios AT javierlezaun perceptionsofbioenergywithcarboncaptureandstorageindifferentpolicyscenarios AT jamespalmer perceptionsofbioenergywithcarboncaptureandstorageindifferentpolicyscenarios
_version_	1718379957684535296

Perceptions of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage in different policy scenarios

Ejemplares similares