Corporate sustainability reporting: Linkage of corporate disclosure information and performance indicators

The research was designed to evaluate the determinants of corporate sustainability disclosure practices for 85 Japanese companies listed on Tokyo Stock Exchange (TSE) in the First Section, from 2008 to 2014. The study examined disclosure information from CSR and annual—integrated reports and corpora...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: K.A.K. Gnanaweera, N. Kunori
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Group 2018
Materias:
csr
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a446fa7ca82748179d61e3f4e2157aee
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a446fa7ca82748179d61e3f4e2157aee
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a446fa7ca82748179d61e3f4e2157aee2021-12-02T14:35:47ZCorporate sustainability reporting: Linkage of corporate disclosure information and performance indicators2331-197510.1080/23311975.2018.1423872https://doaj.org/article/a446fa7ca82748179d61e3f4e2157aee2018-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2018.1423872https://doaj.org/toc/2331-1975The research was designed to evaluate the determinants of corporate sustainability disclosure practices for 85 Japanese companies listed on Tokyo Stock Exchange (TSE) in the First Section, from 2008 to 2014. The study examined disclosure information from CSR and annual—integrated reports and corporate websites. The study’s objective is to measure corporate sustainability disclosure guidelines determination (CSDF rate) and the relationship between CSDF rate and corporate sustainability performance. The content analysis and regression analysis were conducted to examine the research objective. The results of content analysis indicate that listed firms on TSE disclose some extent on environmental, social and economic information but the level of disclosure is vary; CSDF indicator with maximum disclosure level attributed to “Total amount of greenhouse emissions” with 99% disclosing rate and the minimum is the “Index and Grades” with 0%. Moreover, the study finds mixed results conforming to correlation and regression analysis. Similar to some existing studies, sustainability disclosure level and sustainability performance indicators have no strong association. Because there is a weak positive significant linkage among CSDF rate and water consumption, firm’s size, and environmental conservation effort. Nevertheless, to be consistent with social values, ensuing the guidelines and the accuracy of the disclosure information are important for corporate sustainability reporting.K.A.K. GnanaweeraN. KunoriTaylor & Francis Grouparticlecsrsustainabilitycorporate disclosureperformance indicatorsBusinessHF5001-6182Management. Industrial managementHD28-70ENCogent Business & Management, Vol 5, Iss 1 (2018)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic csr
sustainability
corporate disclosure
performance indicators
Business
HF5001-6182
Management. Industrial management
HD28-70
spellingShingle csr
sustainability
corporate disclosure
performance indicators
Business
HF5001-6182
Management. Industrial management
HD28-70
K.A.K. Gnanaweera
N. Kunori
Corporate sustainability reporting: Linkage of corporate disclosure information and performance indicators
description The research was designed to evaluate the determinants of corporate sustainability disclosure practices for 85 Japanese companies listed on Tokyo Stock Exchange (TSE) in the First Section, from 2008 to 2014. The study examined disclosure information from CSR and annual—integrated reports and corporate websites. The study’s objective is to measure corporate sustainability disclosure guidelines determination (CSDF rate) and the relationship between CSDF rate and corporate sustainability performance. The content analysis and regression analysis were conducted to examine the research objective. The results of content analysis indicate that listed firms on TSE disclose some extent on environmental, social and economic information but the level of disclosure is vary; CSDF indicator with maximum disclosure level attributed to “Total amount of greenhouse emissions” with 99% disclosing rate and the minimum is the “Index and Grades” with 0%. Moreover, the study finds mixed results conforming to correlation and regression analysis. Similar to some existing studies, sustainability disclosure level and sustainability performance indicators have no strong association. Because there is a weak positive significant linkage among CSDF rate and water consumption, firm’s size, and environmental conservation effort. Nevertheless, to be consistent with social values, ensuing the guidelines and the accuracy of the disclosure information are important for corporate sustainability reporting.
format article
author K.A.K. Gnanaweera
N. Kunori
author_facet K.A.K. Gnanaweera
N. Kunori
author_sort K.A.K. Gnanaweera
title Corporate sustainability reporting: Linkage of corporate disclosure information and performance indicators
title_short Corporate sustainability reporting: Linkage of corporate disclosure information and performance indicators
title_full Corporate sustainability reporting: Linkage of corporate disclosure information and performance indicators
title_fullStr Corporate sustainability reporting: Linkage of corporate disclosure information and performance indicators
title_full_unstemmed Corporate sustainability reporting: Linkage of corporate disclosure information and performance indicators
title_sort corporate sustainability reporting: linkage of corporate disclosure information and performance indicators
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate 2018
url https://doaj.org/article/a446fa7ca82748179d61e3f4e2157aee
work_keys_str_mv AT kakgnanaweera corporatesustainabilityreportinglinkageofcorporatedisclosureinformationandperformanceindicators
AT nkunori corporatesustainabilityreportinglinkageofcorporatedisclosureinformationandperformanceindicators
_version_ 1718391089665146880