Comparative effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin in first-line treatment of advanced squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer in a US community oncology setting

Raja Mudad,1 Manish B Patel,2 Sandra Margunato-Debay,2 David Garofalo,3 Lincy S Lal4 1University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hollywood, FL, USA; 2Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ, USA; 3Cardinal Health, Dallas, TX, USA; 4University of Texas School of Pub...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mudad R, Patel MB, Margunato-Debay S, Garofalo D, Lal LS
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a44e6c494f2141c8b3de11c079cf5d2f
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a44e6c494f2141c8b3de11c079cf5d2f
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a44e6c494f2141c8b3de11c079cf5d2f2021-12-02T00:10:38ZComparative effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin in first-line treatment of advanced squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer in a US community oncology setting1179-2728https://doaj.org/article/a44e6c494f2141c8b3de11c079cf5d2f2017-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/comparative-effectiveness-and-safety-of-nab-paclitaxel-plus-carboplati-peer-reviewed-article-LCTThttps://doaj.org/toc/1179-2728Raja Mudad,1 Manish B Patel,2 Sandra Margunato-Debay,2 David Garofalo,3 Lincy S Lal4 1University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hollywood, FL, USA; 2Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ, USA; 3Cardinal Health, Dallas, TX, USA; 4University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA Introduction: Real-world comparative effectiveness, safety, and supportive care use of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus platinum were analyzed in patients with advanced or metastatic squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Materials and methods: Patients who received ≥ 1 cycle of first-line nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin or gemcitabine plus platinum were identified from the Navigating Cancer database. Clinical effectiveness endpoints included overall survival (OS) and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD). Other endpoints included safety and utilization of supportive care. Cox proportional hazards models were used to control for potential confounding effects of baseline characteristics.Results: In total, 193 patients were included (nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin, n = 61; gemcitabine plus platinum, n = 132). Baseline characteristics were generally similar between the cohorts. Patients receiving nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin had a significantly longer OS than those receiving gemcitabine plus carboplatin (median, 12.8 vs 9.0 months; P = 0.03). However, the adjusted difference was not statistically significant (adjusted HR 1.55; 95% CI, 0.99–2.42; P = 0.06). nab-Paclitaxel plus carboplatin-treated patients had significantly longer TTD than gemcitabine plus carboplatin-treated patients (median, 4.3 vs 3.5 months; P = 0.03; adjusted HR 1.39; 95% CI, 1.01–1.90; P = 0.04). Grade 3 or 4 anemia and neutropenia were significantly lower in patients treated with nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin. Nausea and neuropathy (grade not specified) were significantly higher in the nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin than the gemcitabine plus carboplatin group. No differences in supportive care use were observed between the cohorts.Conclusion: These real-world data support the effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin for first-line treatment of advanced squamous cell NSCLC. Keywords: chemotherapy, doublet treatment options, electronic medical records, NSCLC, real-world evidence, retrospective analysisMudad RPatel MBMargunato-Debay SGarofalo DLal LSDove Medical PressarticleChemotherapydoublet treatment optionselectronic medical recordsNSCLCreal-world evidenceretrospective analysisNeoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogensRC254-282ENLung Cancer: Targets and Therapy, Vol Volume 8, Pp 179-190 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Chemotherapy
doublet treatment options
electronic medical records
NSCLC
real-world evidence
retrospective analysis
Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
RC254-282
spellingShingle Chemotherapy
doublet treatment options
electronic medical records
NSCLC
real-world evidence
retrospective analysis
Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
RC254-282
Mudad R
Patel MB
Margunato-Debay S
Garofalo D
Lal LS
Comparative effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin in first-line treatment of advanced squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer in a US community oncology setting
description Raja Mudad,1 Manish B Patel,2 Sandra Margunato-Debay,2 David Garofalo,3 Lincy S Lal4 1University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hollywood, FL, USA; 2Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ, USA; 3Cardinal Health, Dallas, TX, USA; 4University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA Introduction: Real-world comparative effectiveness, safety, and supportive care use of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus platinum were analyzed in patients with advanced or metastatic squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Materials and methods: Patients who received ≥ 1 cycle of first-line nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin or gemcitabine plus platinum were identified from the Navigating Cancer database. Clinical effectiveness endpoints included overall survival (OS) and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD). Other endpoints included safety and utilization of supportive care. Cox proportional hazards models were used to control for potential confounding effects of baseline characteristics.Results: In total, 193 patients were included (nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin, n = 61; gemcitabine plus platinum, n = 132). Baseline characteristics were generally similar between the cohorts. Patients receiving nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin had a significantly longer OS than those receiving gemcitabine plus carboplatin (median, 12.8 vs 9.0 months; P = 0.03). However, the adjusted difference was not statistically significant (adjusted HR 1.55; 95% CI, 0.99–2.42; P = 0.06). nab-Paclitaxel plus carboplatin-treated patients had significantly longer TTD than gemcitabine plus carboplatin-treated patients (median, 4.3 vs 3.5 months; P = 0.03; adjusted HR 1.39; 95% CI, 1.01–1.90; P = 0.04). Grade 3 or 4 anemia and neutropenia were significantly lower in patients treated with nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin. Nausea and neuropathy (grade not specified) were significantly higher in the nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin than the gemcitabine plus carboplatin group. No differences in supportive care use were observed between the cohorts.Conclusion: These real-world data support the effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin for first-line treatment of advanced squamous cell NSCLC. Keywords: chemotherapy, doublet treatment options, electronic medical records, NSCLC, real-world evidence, retrospective analysis
format article
author Mudad R
Patel MB
Margunato-Debay S
Garofalo D
Lal LS
author_facet Mudad R
Patel MB
Margunato-Debay S
Garofalo D
Lal LS
author_sort Mudad R
title Comparative effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin in first-line treatment of advanced squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer in a US community oncology setting
title_short Comparative effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin in first-line treatment of advanced squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer in a US community oncology setting
title_full Comparative effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin in first-line treatment of advanced squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer in a US community oncology setting
title_fullStr Comparative effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin in first-line treatment of advanced squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer in a US community oncology setting
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin in first-line treatment of advanced squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer in a US community oncology setting
title_sort comparative effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin in first-line treatment of advanced squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer in a us community oncology setting
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/a44e6c494f2141c8b3de11c079cf5d2f
work_keys_str_mv AT mudadr comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnabpaclitaxelpluscarboplatinvsgemcitabinepluscarboplatininfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedsquamouscellnonsmallcelllungcancerinauscommunityoncologysetting
AT patelmb comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnabpaclitaxelpluscarboplatinvsgemcitabinepluscarboplatininfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedsquamouscellnonsmallcelllungcancerinauscommunityoncologysetting
AT margunatodebays comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnabpaclitaxelpluscarboplatinvsgemcitabinepluscarboplatininfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedsquamouscellnonsmallcelllungcancerinauscommunityoncologysetting
AT garofalod comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnabpaclitaxelpluscarboplatinvsgemcitabinepluscarboplatininfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedsquamouscellnonsmallcelllungcancerinauscommunityoncologysetting
AT lalls comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnabpaclitaxelpluscarboplatinvsgemcitabinepluscarboplatininfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedsquamouscellnonsmallcelllungcancerinauscommunityoncologysetting
_version_ 1718403880521302016