Time pressure inhibits dynamic advantage in the classification of facial expressions of emotion.

Recent studies suggest an advantage in the recognition of dynamic over static facial expressions of emotion. Here, we explored the differences in the processing of static and dynamic faces under condition of time pressure. A group of 18 participants classified static and dynamic facial expressions (...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Zhongqing Jiang, Wenhui Li, Guillermo Recio, Ying Liu, Wenbo Luo, Doufei Zhang, Dan Sun
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/a45777a0f6d54d869a5a94189bd402ad
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:a45777a0f6d54d869a5a94189bd402ad
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:a45777a0f6d54d869a5a94189bd402ad2021-11-18T08:15:15ZTime pressure inhibits dynamic advantage in the classification of facial expressions of emotion.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0100162https://doaj.org/article/a45777a0f6d54d869a5a94189bd402ad2014-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24941259/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Recent studies suggest an advantage in the recognition of dynamic over static facial expressions of emotion. Here, we explored the differences in the processing of static and dynamic faces under condition of time pressure. A group of 18 participants classified static and dynamic facial expressions (angry, happy, and neutral). In order to increase the goal-directed attention, instructions emphasized speed and announced time pressure in the interval for the response (maximal 600 ms). Participants responded faster and more accurately in the static than in the dynamic condition. Event-related potentials (ERPs) showed larger amplitude of the P1 (90-130 ms) and LPC (300-600 ms) components for dynamic relative to static stimuli, indicating enhanced early visual processing and emotional attention. On the other hand, the N170 was more negative in static relative to dynamic faces, suggesting better structural encoding for static faces under time pressure. The present study shows some advantages in the processing of static over dynamic facial expressions of emotion when the top-down (goal-driven) attention is strengthened.Zhongqing JiangWenhui LiGuillermo RecioYing LiuWenbo LuoDoufei ZhangDan SunPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 9, Iss 6, p e100162 (2014)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Zhongqing Jiang Wenhui Li Guillermo Recio Ying Liu Wenbo Luo Doufei Zhang Dan Sun Time pressure inhibits dynamic advantage in the classification of facial expressions of emotion.
description	Recent studies suggest an advantage in the recognition of dynamic over static facial expressions of emotion. Here, we explored the differences in the processing of static and dynamic faces under condition of time pressure. A group of 18 participants classified static and dynamic facial expressions (angry, happy, and neutral). In order to increase the goal-directed attention, instructions emphasized speed and announced time pressure in the interval for the response (maximal 600 ms). Participants responded faster and more accurately in the static than in the dynamic condition. Event-related potentials (ERPs) showed larger amplitude of the P1 (90-130 ms) and LPC (300-600 ms) components for dynamic relative to static stimuli, indicating enhanced early visual processing and emotional attention. On the other hand, the N170 was more negative in static relative to dynamic faces, suggesting better structural encoding for static faces under time pressure. The present study shows some advantages in the processing of static over dynamic facial expressions of emotion when the top-down (goal-driven) attention is strengthened.
format	article
author	Zhongqing Jiang Wenhui Li Guillermo Recio Ying Liu Wenbo Luo Doufei Zhang Dan Sun
author_facet	Zhongqing Jiang Wenhui Li Guillermo Recio Ying Liu Wenbo Luo Doufei Zhang Dan Sun
author_sort	Zhongqing Jiang
title	Time pressure inhibits dynamic advantage in the classification of facial expressions of emotion.
title_short	Time pressure inhibits dynamic advantage in the classification of facial expressions of emotion.
title_full	Time pressure inhibits dynamic advantage in the classification of facial expressions of emotion.
title_fullStr	Time pressure inhibits dynamic advantage in the classification of facial expressions of emotion.
title_full_unstemmed	Time pressure inhibits dynamic advantage in the classification of facial expressions of emotion.
title_sort	time pressure inhibits dynamic advantage in the classification of facial expressions of emotion.
publisher	Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate	2014
url	https://doaj.org/article/a45777a0f6d54d869a5a94189bd402ad
work_keys_str_mv	AT zhongqingjiang timepressureinhibitsdynamicadvantageintheclassificationoffacialexpressionsofemotion AT wenhuili timepressureinhibitsdynamicadvantageintheclassificationoffacialexpressionsofemotion AT guillermorecio timepressureinhibitsdynamicadvantageintheclassificationoffacialexpressionsofemotion AT yingliu timepressureinhibitsdynamicadvantageintheclassificationoffacialexpressionsofemotion AT wenboluo timepressureinhibitsdynamicadvantageintheclassificationoffacialexpressionsofemotion AT doufeizhang timepressureinhibitsdynamicadvantageintheclassificationoffacialexpressionsofemotion AT dansun timepressureinhibitsdynamicadvantageintheclassificationoffacialexpressionsofemotion
_version_	1718422001917362176

Time pressure inhibits dynamic advantage in the classification of facial expressions of emotion.

Ejemplares similares