A (In)consistência das Agendas Transversais de Governo ante os Grupos de Interesse: O Caso do Promeso
The public policies have been studied from different theoretical and technical aspects. However, there is still a gap that addresses several issues related to intersectoral and integration of actions among governmental agencies. The developmentof the research required a theoretical review that has g...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | PT |
| Publicado: |
Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul
2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doi.org/10.21527/2237-6453.2019.48.193-212 https://doaj.org/article/a4bfcefd92f6467386fb7c326a96754d |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | The public policies have been studied from different theoretical and technical aspects. However, there is still a gap that addresses several issues related to intersectoral and integration of actions among governmental agencies. The developmentof the research required a theoretical review that has gone from political science to regional development, through discussion of mainstreaming and intersectionality in public policy. Also the research used databases of the Secretariat of Federal Budge and official documents of the Ministry of National Integration. The last one are the documents of the Sustainable Development Program of Differentiated Mesoregions (Promeso). Additionally the databases of the Superior Electoral Court were consulted. The study came to the conclusion that public policy characterized by intersectionality, have clear marks of competition and little coordination among agencies of the federal government as they follow various logics, determined by the leaders of these agencies. |
|---|