Temporal dynamics of stream fish assemblages and the role of spatial scale in quantifying change

Abstract Spatial grain of studies of communities is often based on arbitrary convention. Few studies have examined how spatial scaling of grain size affects estimates of compositional change over time, despite its broad implications. Fish assemblage structure was compared between 1974 and 2014 at 33...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Zachery D. Zbinden
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Wiley 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a4c8686063c74bcb8602ea312641ef7a
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a4c8686063c74bcb8602ea312641ef7a
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a4c8686063c74bcb8602ea312641ef7a2021-11-04T13:06:10ZTemporal dynamics of stream fish assemblages and the role of spatial scale in quantifying change2045-775810.1002/ece3.5954https://doaj.org/article/a4c8686063c74bcb8602ea312641ef7a2020-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5954https://doaj.org/toc/2045-7758Abstract Spatial grain of studies of communities is often based on arbitrary convention. Few studies have examined how spatial scaling of grain size affects estimates of compositional change over time, despite its broad implications. Fish assemblage structure was compared between 1974 and 2014 at 33 sampling locations in the Muddy Boggy River drainage, USA. The two main objectives for this comparison were to quantify change in assemblage structure and to test for a relationship between compositional change and spatial scale. Spatial scale was manipulated by pooling assemblage data into a continuous range of groups, which increased in size from K = 33 pairs (i.e., local scale) to K = 1 pair (i.e., global scale), via clustering algorithm based on pair‐wise fluvial distance. Local assemblages (stream reaches) varied in the degree of assemblage change over time (range = 0.10–0.99 dissimilarity; mean = 0.66). The global assemblage (drainage), however, remained relatively similar. A discontinuity in the relationship between compositional change and spatial scale occurred at K = 15 (mean dissimilarity = 0.56; p = .062), and this grouping is roughly the size of the headwater/tributary drainages (i.e., stream order ≤ 3) in the study system. Spatial scale can impact estimates of biodiversity change over time. These results suggest assemblages are more dynamic at individual stream reaches than at the scale of the entire drainage. The decline in assemblage change at the spatial scale of K = 15 deserves further attention given the marginal significance, despite a small sample size (n = 15). This pattern could suggest regional and meta‐community processes become more important in shaping assemblage dynamics at the scale of headwater drainages, whereas the factors responsible for driving individual stream reach dynamics (e.g., stochasticity) become less important. Defining assemblages at a larger scale will result in different estimates of species persistence. Biodiversity monitoring efforts must take the effect of spatial scaling into consideration.Zachery D. ZbindenWileyarticlebiodiversity monitoringcommunity stabilitydomains of scaleheadwater streamspersistencespatial clusteringEcologyQH540-549.5ENEcology and Evolution, Vol 10, Iss 2, Pp 952-961 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic biodiversity monitoring
community stability
domains of scale
headwater streams
persistence
spatial clustering
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle biodiversity monitoring
community stability
domains of scale
headwater streams
persistence
spatial clustering
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Zachery D. Zbinden
Temporal dynamics of stream fish assemblages and the role of spatial scale in quantifying change
description Abstract Spatial grain of studies of communities is often based on arbitrary convention. Few studies have examined how spatial scaling of grain size affects estimates of compositional change over time, despite its broad implications. Fish assemblage structure was compared between 1974 and 2014 at 33 sampling locations in the Muddy Boggy River drainage, USA. The two main objectives for this comparison were to quantify change in assemblage structure and to test for a relationship between compositional change and spatial scale. Spatial scale was manipulated by pooling assemblage data into a continuous range of groups, which increased in size from K = 33 pairs (i.e., local scale) to K = 1 pair (i.e., global scale), via clustering algorithm based on pair‐wise fluvial distance. Local assemblages (stream reaches) varied in the degree of assemblage change over time (range = 0.10–0.99 dissimilarity; mean = 0.66). The global assemblage (drainage), however, remained relatively similar. A discontinuity in the relationship between compositional change and spatial scale occurred at K = 15 (mean dissimilarity = 0.56; p = .062), and this grouping is roughly the size of the headwater/tributary drainages (i.e., stream order ≤ 3) in the study system. Spatial scale can impact estimates of biodiversity change over time. These results suggest assemblages are more dynamic at individual stream reaches than at the scale of the entire drainage. The decline in assemblage change at the spatial scale of K = 15 deserves further attention given the marginal significance, despite a small sample size (n = 15). This pattern could suggest regional and meta‐community processes become more important in shaping assemblage dynamics at the scale of headwater drainages, whereas the factors responsible for driving individual stream reach dynamics (e.g., stochasticity) become less important. Defining assemblages at a larger scale will result in different estimates of species persistence. Biodiversity monitoring efforts must take the effect of spatial scaling into consideration.
format article
author Zachery D. Zbinden
author_facet Zachery D. Zbinden
author_sort Zachery D. Zbinden
title Temporal dynamics of stream fish assemblages and the role of spatial scale in quantifying change
title_short Temporal dynamics of stream fish assemblages and the role of spatial scale in quantifying change
title_full Temporal dynamics of stream fish assemblages and the role of spatial scale in quantifying change
title_fullStr Temporal dynamics of stream fish assemblages and the role of spatial scale in quantifying change
title_full_unstemmed Temporal dynamics of stream fish assemblages and the role of spatial scale in quantifying change
title_sort temporal dynamics of stream fish assemblages and the role of spatial scale in quantifying change
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/a4c8686063c74bcb8602ea312641ef7a
work_keys_str_mv AT zacherydzbinden temporaldynamicsofstreamfishassemblagesandtheroleofspatialscaleinquantifyingchange
_version_ 1718444919609098240