Bioethanol from Napier grass employing different fermentation strategies to evaluate a suitable operation for batch bioethanol production

Napier grass has been used as animal feed especially in countries with tropical climates. As interest in alternative feedstocks for fuel bioethanol increases, Napier grass has been considered as a potential feedstock for lignocellulosic bioethanol production. Two main fermentation strategies, includ...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mallika Boonmee Kongkeitkajorn, Rotsarin Yaemdeeka, Irada Chaiyota, Korakoch Hamsupo, Atcha Oraintara, Alissara Reungsang
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
SHF
SSF
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a4d72c0c765944a594aca4aaea4a7a54
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a4d72c0c765944a594aca4aaea4a7a54
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a4d72c0c765944a594aca4aaea4a7a542021-12-02T05:03:37ZBioethanol from Napier grass employing different fermentation strategies to evaluate a suitable operation for batch bioethanol production2590-174510.1016/j.ecmx.2021.100143https://doaj.org/article/a4d72c0c765944a594aca4aaea4a7a542021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590174521000684https://doaj.org/toc/2590-1745Napier grass has been used as animal feed especially in countries with tropical climates. As interest in alternative feedstocks for fuel bioethanol increases, Napier grass has been considered as a potential feedstock for lignocellulosic bioethanol production. Two main fermentation strategies, including separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF), were investigated with various substrate and enzyme feeding patterns in SSF. Total substrate loading of 15% and enzyme dosage of 40 FPU/gsubstrate were controlled to compare the performance of each fermentation variation. SHF and SSF resulted in similar ethanol production of 30.6 ± 0.4 g/L and 28.5 ± 2.3 g/L. Preincubation of grass and enzyme resulted in significant lower ethanol at 20.3 ± 1.6 g/L. Portioning the addition of grass and enzyme did not change the ethanol production significantly. Increasing the grass loading to 30% via portioning approach resulted in an increase in ethanol production in batch fermentation, while the addition of extra enzyme did not help with increasing ethanol production.Mallika Boonmee KongkeitkajornRotsarin YaemdeekaIrada ChaiyotaKorakoch HamsupoAtcha OraintaraAlissara ReungsangElsevierarticleBioethanolNapier grassSHFSSFLignocelluloseBiofuelEngineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040ENEnergy Conversion and Management: X, Vol 12, Iss , Pp 100143- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Bioethanol
Napier grass
SHF
SSF
Lignocellulose
Biofuel
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
spellingShingle Bioethanol
Napier grass
SHF
SSF
Lignocellulose
Biofuel
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
Mallika Boonmee Kongkeitkajorn
Rotsarin Yaemdeeka
Irada Chaiyota
Korakoch Hamsupo
Atcha Oraintara
Alissara Reungsang
Bioethanol from Napier grass employing different fermentation strategies to evaluate a suitable operation for batch bioethanol production
description Napier grass has been used as animal feed especially in countries with tropical climates. As interest in alternative feedstocks for fuel bioethanol increases, Napier grass has been considered as a potential feedstock for lignocellulosic bioethanol production. Two main fermentation strategies, including separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF), were investigated with various substrate and enzyme feeding patterns in SSF. Total substrate loading of 15% and enzyme dosage of 40 FPU/gsubstrate were controlled to compare the performance of each fermentation variation. SHF and SSF resulted in similar ethanol production of 30.6 ± 0.4 g/L and 28.5 ± 2.3 g/L. Preincubation of grass and enzyme resulted in significant lower ethanol at 20.3 ± 1.6 g/L. Portioning the addition of grass and enzyme did not change the ethanol production significantly. Increasing the grass loading to 30% via portioning approach resulted in an increase in ethanol production in batch fermentation, while the addition of extra enzyme did not help with increasing ethanol production.
format article
author Mallika Boonmee Kongkeitkajorn
Rotsarin Yaemdeeka
Irada Chaiyota
Korakoch Hamsupo
Atcha Oraintara
Alissara Reungsang
author_facet Mallika Boonmee Kongkeitkajorn
Rotsarin Yaemdeeka
Irada Chaiyota
Korakoch Hamsupo
Atcha Oraintara
Alissara Reungsang
author_sort Mallika Boonmee Kongkeitkajorn
title Bioethanol from Napier grass employing different fermentation strategies to evaluate a suitable operation for batch bioethanol production
title_short Bioethanol from Napier grass employing different fermentation strategies to evaluate a suitable operation for batch bioethanol production
title_full Bioethanol from Napier grass employing different fermentation strategies to evaluate a suitable operation for batch bioethanol production
title_fullStr Bioethanol from Napier grass employing different fermentation strategies to evaluate a suitable operation for batch bioethanol production
title_full_unstemmed Bioethanol from Napier grass employing different fermentation strategies to evaluate a suitable operation for batch bioethanol production
title_sort bioethanol from napier grass employing different fermentation strategies to evaluate a suitable operation for batch bioethanol production
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/a4d72c0c765944a594aca4aaea4a7a54
work_keys_str_mv AT mallikaboonmeekongkeitkajorn bioethanolfromnapiergrassemployingdifferentfermentationstrategiestoevaluateasuitableoperationforbatchbioethanolproduction
AT rotsarinyaemdeeka bioethanolfromnapiergrassemployingdifferentfermentationstrategiestoevaluateasuitableoperationforbatchbioethanolproduction
AT iradachaiyota bioethanolfromnapiergrassemployingdifferentfermentationstrategiestoevaluateasuitableoperationforbatchbioethanolproduction
AT korakochhamsupo bioethanolfromnapiergrassemployingdifferentfermentationstrategiestoevaluateasuitableoperationforbatchbioethanolproduction
AT atchaoraintara bioethanolfromnapiergrassemployingdifferentfermentationstrategiestoevaluateasuitableoperationforbatchbioethanolproduction
AT alissarareungsang bioethanolfromnapiergrassemployingdifferentfermentationstrategiestoevaluateasuitableoperationforbatchbioethanolproduction
_version_ 1718400667162247168