Buzz Tweet Classification Based on Text and Image Features of Tweets Using Multi-Task Learning
This study investigates social media trends and proposes a buzz tweet classification method to explore the factors causing the buzz phenomenon on Twitter. It is difficult to identify the causes of the buzz phenomenon based solely on texts posted on Twitter. It is expected that by limiting the tweets...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/a4e48647ded1406aadcc5f41e1531b2f |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:a4e48647ded1406aadcc5f41e1531b2f |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:a4e48647ded1406aadcc5f41e1531b2f2021-11-25T16:31:46ZBuzz Tweet Classification Based on Text and Image Features of Tweets Using Multi-Task Learning10.3390/app1122105672076-3417https://doaj.org/article/a4e48647ded1406aadcc5f41e1531b2f2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/22/10567https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3417This study investigates social media trends and proposes a buzz tweet classification method to explore the factors causing the buzz phenomenon on Twitter. It is difficult to identify the causes of the buzz phenomenon based solely on texts posted on Twitter. It is expected that by limiting the tweets to those with attached images and using the characteristics of the images and the relationships between the text and images, a more detailed analysis than that of with text-only tweets can be conducted. Therefore, an analysis method was devised based on a multi-task neural network that uses both the features extracted from the image and text as input and the buzz class (buzz/non-buzz) and the number of “likes (favorites)” and “retweets (RTs)” as output. The predictions made using a single feature of the text and image were compared with the predictions using a combination of multiple features. The differences between buzz and non-buzz features were analyzed based on the cosine similarity between the text and the image. The buzz class was correctly identified with a correctness rate of approximately 80% for all combinations of image and text features, with the combination of BERT and VGG16 providing the highest correctness rate.Reishi AmitaniKazuyuki MatsumotoMinoru YoshidaKenji KitaMDPI AGarticlemulti-task learningbuzz classificationsocial mediatrend analysisTechnologyTEngineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040Biology (General)QH301-705.5PhysicsQC1-999ChemistryQD1-999ENApplied Sciences, Vol 11, Iss 10567, p 10567 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
multi-task learning buzz classification social media trend analysis Technology T Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Physics QC1-999 Chemistry QD1-999 |
spellingShingle |
multi-task learning buzz classification social media trend analysis Technology T Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Physics QC1-999 Chemistry QD1-999 Reishi Amitani Kazuyuki Matsumoto Minoru Yoshida Kenji Kita Buzz Tweet Classification Based on Text and Image Features of Tweets Using Multi-Task Learning |
description |
This study investigates social media trends and proposes a buzz tweet classification method to explore the factors causing the buzz phenomenon on Twitter. It is difficult to identify the causes of the buzz phenomenon based solely on texts posted on Twitter. It is expected that by limiting the tweets to those with attached images and using the characteristics of the images and the relationships between the text and images, a more detailed analysis than that of with text-only tweets can be conducted. Therefore, an analysis method was devised based on a multi-task neural network that uses both the features extracted from the image and text as input and the buzz class (buzz/non-buzz) and the number of “likes (favorites)” and “retweets (RTs)” as output. The predictions made using a single feature of the text and image were compared with the predictions using a combination of multiple features. The differences between buzz and non-buzz features were analyzed based on the cosine similarity between the text and the image. The buzz class was correctly identified with a correctness rate of approximately 80% for all combinations of image and text features, with the combination of BERT and VGG16 providing the highest correctness rate. |
format |
article |
author |
Reishi Amitani Kazuyuki Matsumoto Minoru Yoshida Kenji Kita |
author_facet |
Reishi Amitani Kazuyuki Matsumoto Minoru Yoshida Kenji Kita |
author_sort |
Reishi Amitani |
title |
Buzz Tweet Classification Based on Text and Image Features of Tweets Using Multi-Task Learning |
title_short |
Buzz Tweet Classification Based on Text and Image Features of Tweets Using Multi-Task Learning |
title_full |
Buzz Tweet Classification Based on Text and Image Features of Tweets Using Multi-Task Learning |
title_fullStr |
Buzz Tweet Classification Based on Text and Image Features of Tweets Using Multi-Task Learning |
title_full_unstemmed |
Buzz Tweet Classification Based on Text and Image Features of Tweets Using Multi-Task Learning |
title_sort |
buzz tweet classification based on text and image features of tweets using multi-task learning |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/a4e48647ded1406aadcc5f41e1531b2f |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT reishiamitani buzztweetclassificationbasedontextandimagefeaturesoftweetsusingmultitasklearning AT kazuyukimatsumoto buzztweetclassificationbasedontextandimagefeaturesoftweetsusingmultitasklearning AT minoruyoshida buzztweetclassificationbasedontextandimagefeaturesoftweetsusingmultitasklearning AT kenjikita buzztweetclassificationbasedontextandimagefeaturesoftweetsusingmultitasklearning |
_version_ |
1718413156680728576 |