Comparison of intravenous regional anaesthesia with lidocaine and ropivacaine in dogs

Abstract The present study was designed to compare the effects of lidocaine and ropivacaine in intravenous regional anaesthesia (IVRA) in dogs. Twelve adult male dogs were used. Under isoflurane anaesthesia, exsanguination was performed in the target forelimb. Then, a blood pressure cuff was encircl...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Hadi Imani Rastabi, Roya Mirzajani, Masoumeh Ezzati Givi, Marzieh Mohammadpoor
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Wiley 2021
Materias:	analgesia canine exsanguination toxicity Veterinary medicine SF600-1100
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/a4e9d5b110b64e6e9f1dd7cd2b00c675
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:a4e9d5b110b64e6e9f1dd7cd2b00c675
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:a4e9d5b110b64e6e9f1dd7cd2b00c6752021-11-19T17:14:25ZComparison of intravenous regional anaesthesia with lidocaine and ropivacaine in dogs2053-109510.1002/vms3.608https://doaj.org/article/a4e9d5b110b64e6e9f1dd7cd2b00c6752021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.608https://doaj.org/toc/2053-1095Abstract The present study was designed to compare the effects of lidocaine and ropivacaine in intravenous regional anaesthesia (IVRA) in dogs. Twelve adult male dogs were used. Under isoflurane anaesthesia, exsanguination was performed in the target forelimb. Then, a blood pressure cuff was encircled around the limb proximal to the elbow joint with a pressure of approximately 150 mmHg above the mean arterial blood pressure. The animals then received one of the two treatments of lidocaine (3 mg/kg) or ropivacaine (1.5 mg/kg) with a final volume of 0.6 mL/kg into the cephalic vein. After 60 min, the anaesthesia was disrupted and the tourniquet was removed using intermittent opening (30 s) and closing (5 min) manner for three times. The results revealed that at 20 and 30 min after the initiation of IVRA, the dogs in ROP showed higher analgesia than LID. A leakage under the tourniquet during IVRA was detected. Tremor and hypersalivation were observed after tourniquet removal in some dogs. It was concluded that ropivacaine might provide a higher quality of anaesthesia than lidocaine in IVRA in dogs. The development of local anaesthetic toxicity is a major concern and should be considered at the time of tourniquet removal.Hadi Imani RastabiRoya MirzajaniMasoumeh Ezzati GiviMarzieh MohammadpoorWileyarticleanalgesiacanineexsanguinationtoxicityVeterinary medicineSF600-1100ENVeterinary Medicine and Science, Vol 7, Iss 6, Pp 2135-2143 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	analgesia canine exsanguination toxicity Veterinary medicine SF600-1100
spellingShingle	analgesia canine exsanguination toxicity Veterinary medicine SF600-1100 Hadi Imani Rastabi Roya Mirzajani Masoumeh Ezzati Givi Marzieh Mohammadpoor Comparison of intravenous regional anaesthesia with lidocaine and ropivacaine in dogs
description	Abstract The present study was designed to compare the effects of lidocaine and ropivacaine in intravenous regional anaesthesia (IVRA) in dogs. Twelve adult male dogs were used. Under isoflurane anaesthesia, exsanguination was performed in the target forelimb. Then, a blood pressure cuff was encircled around the limb proximal to the elbow joint with a pressure of approximately 150 mmHg above the mean arterial blood pressure. The animals then received one of the two treatments of lidocaine (3 mg/kg) or ropivacaine (1.5 mg/kg) with a final volume of 0.6 mL/kg into the cephalic vein. After 60 min, the anaesthesia was disrupted and the tourniquet was removed using intermittent opening (30 s) and closing (5 min) manner for three times. The results revealed that at 20 and 30 min after the initiation of IVRA, the dogs in ROP showed higher analgesia than LID. A leakage under the tourniquet during IVRA was detected. Tremor and hypersalivation were observed after tourniquet removal in some dogs. It was concluded that ropivacaine might provide a higher quality of anaesthesia than lidocaine in IVRA in dogs. The development of local anaesthetic toxicity is a major concern and should be considered at the time of tourniquet removal.
format	article
author	Hadi Imani Rastabi Roya Mirzajani Masoumeh Ezzati Givi Marzieh Mohammadpoor
author_facet	Hadi Imani Rastabi Roya Mirzajani Masoumeh Ezzati Givi Marzieh Mohammadpoor
author_sort	Hadi Imani Rastabi
title	Comparison of intravenous regional anaesthesia with lidocaine and ropivacaine in dogs
title_short	Comparison of intravenous regional anaesthesia with lidocaine and ropivacaine in dogs
title_full	Comparison of intravenous regional anaesthesia with lidocaine and ropivacaine in dogs
title_fullStr	Comparison of intravenous regional anaesthesia with lidocaine and ropivacaine in dogs
title_full_unstemmed	Comparison of intravenous regional anaesthesia with lidocaine and ropivacaine in dogs
title_sort	comparison of intravenous regional anaesthesia with lidocaine and ropivacaine in dogs
publisher	Wiley
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/a4e9d5b110b64e6e9f1dd7cd2b00c675
work_keys_str_mv	AT hadiimanirastabi comparisonofintravenousregionalanaesthesiawithlidocaineandropivacaineindogs AT royamirzajani comparisonofintravenousregionalanaesthesiawithlidocaineandropivacaineindogs AT masoumehezzatigivi comparisonofintravenousregionalanaesthesiawithlidocaineandropivacaineindogs AT marziehmohammadpoor comparisonofintravenousregionalanaesthesiawithlidocaineandropivacaineindogs
_version_	1718420031018106880

Comparison of intravenous regional anaesthesia with lidocaine and ropivacaine in dogs

Ejemplares similares