The case for increasing returns I: ‘The Hicksian Getaway’ and ‘The Hirshleifer Rescue’
The case for increasing returns is accepted by most heterodox economists. Yet allegiance to decreasing returns in orthodox circles still endures directly and in the form of substitution assumptions. In forty short years from 1928 to 1968, beliefs shifted from Pigou calling rising cost ‘inadmissible’...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | Frederic B. Jennings Jr. |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | DE EN FR |
Publicado: |
Editura ASE Bucuresti
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/a53df5b89fb543bd83fc8edcddc5d5b1 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
The case for increasing returns (2): the methods of planning horizons
por: Frederic B. Jennings Jr.
Publicado: (2016) -
A theory of planning horizons (2): the foundation for an ethical economics
por: Frederic B. Jennings Jr.
Publicado: (2012) -
A theory of planning horizons (1): market design in a post-neoclassical world
por: Frederic B. Jennings, Jr.
Publicado: (2012) -
Economic essays (part two): toward a realistic concept of choice
por: Frederic B. JENNINGS JR.
Publicado: (2020) -
Economic essays (part one): toward a realistic concept of choice
por: Frederic B. Jennings Jr.
Publicado: (2019)