A large pharmacy claims-based descriptive analysis of patients with migraine and associated pharmacologic treatment patterns

David J Muzina, William Chen, Steven J BowlinMedco Health Solutions Inc and Medco Research Institute, LLC, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USAPurpose: To investigate drug use, prescribing patterns, and comorbidities among patients with migraine in a large pharmacy claims database.Methods: 104,625 migraine subje...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muzina DJ, Chen W, Bowlin SJ
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a54c52379da94ed3b3ab73c79ca3db64
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a54c52379da94ed3b3ab73c79ca3db64
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a54c52379da94ed3b3ab73c79ca3db642021-12-02T07:01:06ZA large pharmacy claims-based descriptive analysis of patients with migraine and associated pharmacologic treatment patterns1176-63281178-2021https://doaj.org/article/a54c52379da94ed3b3ab73c79ca3db642011-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.dovepress.com/a-large-pharmacy-claims-based-descriptive-analysis-of-patients-with-mi-a8645https://doaj.org/toc/1176-6328https://doaj.org/toc/1178-2021David J Muzina, William Chen, Steven J BowlinMedco Health Solutions Inc and Medco Research Institute, LLC, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USAPurpose: To investigate drug use, prescribing patterns, and comorbidities among patients with migraine in a large pharmacy claims database.Methods: 104,625 migraine subjects (identified according to the criteria in the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision [ICD-9] for migraine or migraine-specific acute medication use) and an equal number of control patients were selected from a de-identified claims database; the prevalence of patients with migraine-specific claims was determined. Patient demographics, migraine-related medication use, other psychotropic medication use, and comorbidities over a 12-month period were compared between the migraine population and the control group and between migraine subgroups.Results: Of the study population, 3.5% had a migraine diagnosis according to the ICD-9 or received a migraine-specific acute medication. Compared with controls, migraine patients had significantly greater disease comorbidity and higher use of prescription nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and controlled painkillers; they were also more likely to receive medications used to prevent migraines and other nonmigraine psychotropic medications, such as anxiolytics and hypnotics. Among migraine patients, 66% received acute migraine-specific medication while only 20% received US Food and Drug Administration–approved migraine preventive therapy. Notably, one-third of high triptan users did not receive any kind of preventive medication. Multiple medical and psychiatric comorbidities were observed at higher rates among migraine sufferers. In addition to significantly higher utilization of antidepressants compared with controls, migraine patients also received significantly more other psychotropic drugs by a factor of 2:1.Conclusion: Acute migraine medications are commonly used and frequently dispensed at rates that raise concern of overuse; high use is often seen without any preventive medications. Furthermore, use of US Food and Drug Administration–approved preventive medications is low. Finally, patients with migraine are significantly more likely to receive other psychotropic medications. These findings suggest efforts to optimize the management of migraines could address appropriate use of triptans, increased and more effective use of migraine preventive medications, and better understanding of the use of other psychotropics.Keywords: headaches, triptans, migraine preventive therapy, comorbidity, psychotropicsMuzina DJChen WBowlin SJDove Medical PressarticleNeurosciences. Biological psychiatry. NeuropsychiatryRC321-571Neurology. Diseases of the nervous systemRC346-429ENNeuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, Vol 2011, Iss Issue 1, Pp 663-672 (2011)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
RC346-429
spellingShingle Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
RC346-429
Muzina DJ
Chen W
Bowlin SJ
A large pharmacy claims-based descriptive analysis of patients with migraine and associated pharmacologic treatment patterns
description David J Muzina, William Chen, Steven J BowlinMedco Health Solutions Inc and Medco Research Institute, LLC, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USAPurpose: To investigate drug use, prescribing patterns, and comorbidities among patients with migraine in a large pharmacy claims database.Methods: 104,625 migraine subjects (identified according to the criteria in the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision [ICD-9] for migraine or migraine-specific acute medication use) and an equal number of control patients were selected from a de-identified claims database; the prevalence of patients with migraine-specific claims was determined. Patient demographics, migraine-related medication use, other psychotropic medication use, and comorbidities over a 12-month period were compared between the migraine population and the control group and between migraine subgroups.Results: Of the study population, 3.5% had a migraine diagnosis according to the ICD-9 or received a migraine-specific acute medication. Compared with controls, migraine patients had significantly greater disease comorbidity and higher use of prescription nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and controlled painkillers; they were also more likely to receive medications used to prevent migraines and other nonmigraine psychotropic medications, such as anxiolytics and hypnotics. Among migraine patients, 66% received acute migraine-specific medication while only 20% received US Food and Drug Administration–approved migraine preventive therapy. Notably, one-third of high triptan users did not receive any kind of preventive medication. Multiple medical and psychiatric comorbidities were observed at higher rates among migraine sufferers. In addition to significantly higher utilization of antidepressants compared with controls, migraine patients also received significantly more other psychotropic drugs by a factor of 2:1.Conclusion: Acute migraine medications are commonly used and frequently dispensed at rates that raise concern of overuse; high use is often seen without any preventive medications. Furthermore, use of US Food and Drug Administration–approved preventive medications is low. Finally, patients with migraine are significantly more likely to receive other psychotropic medications. These findings suggest efforts to optimize the management of migraines could address appropriate use of triptans, increased and more effective use of migraine preventive medications, and better understanding of the use of other psychotropics.Keywords: headaches, triptans, migraine preventive therapy, comorbidity, psychotropics
format article
author Muzina DJ
Chen W
Bowlin SJ
author_facet Muzina DJ
Chen W
Bowlin SJ
author_sort Muzina DJ
title A large pharmacy claims-based descriptive analysis of patients with migraine and associated pharmacologic treatment patterns
title_short A large pharmacy claims-based descriptive analysis of patients with migraine and associated pharmacologic treatment patterns
title_full A large pharmacy claims-based descriptive analysis of patients with migraine and associated pharmacologic treatment patterns
title_fullStr A large pharmacy claims-based descriptive analysis of patients with migraine and associated pharmacologic treatment patterns
title_full_unstemmed A large pharmacy claims-based descriptive analysis of patients with migraine and associated pharmacologic treatment patterns
title_sort large pharmacy claims-based descriptive analysis of patients with migraine and associated pharmacologic treatment patterns
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2011
url https://doaj.org/article/a54c52379da94ed3b3ab73c79ca3db64
work_keys_str_mv AT muzinadj alargepharmacyclaimsbaseddescriptiveanalysisofpatientswithmigraineandassociatedpharmacologictreatmentpatterns
AT chenw alargepharmacyclaimsbaseddescriptiveanalysisofpatientswithmigraineandassociatedpharmacologictreatmentpatterns
AT bowlinsj alargepharmacyclaimsbaseddescriptiveanalysisofpatientswithmigraineandassociatedpharmacologictreatmentpatterns
AT muzinadj largepharmacyclaimsbaseddescriptiveanalysisofpatientswithmigraineandassociatedpharmacologictreatmentpatterns
AT chenw largepharmacyclaimsbaseddescriptiveanalysisofpatientswithmigraineandassociatedpharmacologictreatmentpatterns
AT bowlinsj largepharmacyclaimsbaseddescriptiveanalysisofpatientswithmigraineandassociatedpharmacologictreatmentpatterns
_version_ 1718399652669161472