Perceptions of laboratory animal facility managers regarding institutional transparency.

Institutions that conduct animal research are often obliged to release some information under various legal or regulatory frameworks. However, within an institution, perspectives on sharing information with the broader public are not well documented. Inside animal facilities, managers exist at the i...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michael W Brunt, Daniel M Weary
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a56b91465d50401d9040e1720582a5ce
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a56b91465d50401d9040e1720582a5ce
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a56b91465d50401d9040e1720582a5ce2021-12-02T20:19:40ZPerceptions of laboratory animal facility managers regarding institutional transparency.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0254279https://doaj.org/article/a56b91465d50401d9040e1720582a5ce2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254279https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Institutions that conduct animal research are often obliged to release some information under various legal or regulatory frameworks. However, within an institution, perspectives on sharing information with the broader public are not well documented. Inside animal facilities, managers exist at the interface between the people who conduct animal research and those charged with providing care for those animals. Their perception of transparency may influence their interpretation of the institutional culture of transparency and may also influence others who use these facilities. The objective of our study was to describe perceptions of transparency among animal research facility managers (all working within the same ethical oversight program), and how these perceptions influenced their experiences. Semi-structured, open-ended interviews were used to describe perceptions and experiences of 12 facility managers relating to animal research transparency. Four themes emerged from the participant interviews: 1) communication strategies, 2) impact on participant, 3) expectations of transparency, and 4) institutional policies. Similarities and differences regarding perceptions of transparency existed among participants, with notable differences between participants working at university versus hospital campuses. These results illustrate differences in perceptions of transparency within one institutional animal care and use program. We conclude that institutions, regulators and the public should not assume a uniform interpretation of a culture of transparency among managers, and that sustained communication efforts are required to support managers and to allow them to develop shared perspectives.Michael W BruntDaniel M WearyPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 7, p e0254279 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Michael W Brunt
Daniel M Weary
Perceptions of laboratory animal facility managers regarding institutional transparency.
description Institutions that conduct animal research are often obliged to release some information under various legal or regulatory frameworks. However, within an institution, perspectives on sharing information with the broader public are not well documented. Inside animal facilities, managers exist at the interface between the people who conduct animal research and those charged with providing care for those animals. Their perception of transparency may influence their interpretation of the institutional culture of transparency and may also influence others who use these facilities. The objective of our study was to describe perceptions of transparency among animal research facility managers (all working within the same ethical oversight program), and how these perceptions influenced their experiences. Semi-structured, open-ended interviews were used to describe perceptions and experiences of 12 facility managers relating to animal research transparency. Four themes emerged from the participant interviews: 1) communication strategies, 2) impact on participant, 3) expectations of transparency, and 4) institutional policies. Similarities and differences regarding perceptions of transparency existed among participants, with notable differences between participants working at university versus hospital campuses. These results illustrate differences in perceptions of transparency within one institutional animal care and use program. We conclude that institutions, regulators and the public should not assume a uniform interpretation of a culture of transparency among managers, and that sustained communication efforts are required to support managers and to allow them to develop shared perspectives.
format article
author Michael W Brunt
Daniel M Weary
author_facet Michael W Brunt
Daniel M Weary
author_sort Michael W Brunt
title Perceptions of laboratory animal facility managers regarding institutional transparency.
title_short Perceptions of laboratory animal facility managers regarding institutional transparency.
title_full Perceptions of laboratory animal facility managers regarding institutional transparency.
title_fullStr Perceptions of laboratory animal facility managers regarding institutional transparency.
title_full_unstemmed Perceptions of laboratory animal facility managers regarding institutional transparency.
title_sort perceptions of laboratory animal facility managers regarding institutional transparency.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/a56b91465d50401d9040e1720582a5ce
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelwbrunt perceptionsoflaboratoryanimalfacilitymanagersregardinginstitutionaltransparency
AT danielmweary perceptionsoflaboratoryanimalfacilitymanagersregardinginstitutionaltransparency
_version_ 1718374182101712896