Phasing out DEHP from plastic indwelling medical devices used for intensive care: Does it reduce the long-term attention deficit of critically ill children?

Background: Children who have been critically ill face long-term developmental impairments. Iatrogenic exposure to di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP), a plasticizer leaching from plastic indwelling medical devices used in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), has been associated with the pronounce...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ilse Vanhorebeek, Govindan Malarvannan, Fabian Güiza, Giulia Poma, Inge Derese, Pieter J. Wouters, Koen Joosten, Sascha Verbruggen, Philippe G. Jorens, Adrian Covaci, Greet Van den Berghe
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a576c375a9a543dcb0c6766ab077c13c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a576c375a9a543dcb0c6766ab077c13c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a576c375a9a543dcb0c6766ab077c13c2021-11-04T04:25:54ZPhasing out DEHP from plastic indwelling medical devices used for intensive care: Does it reduce the long-term attention deficit of critically ill children?0160-412010.1016/j.envint.2021.106962https://doaj.org/article/a576c375a9a543dcb0c6766ab077c13c2022-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412021005870https://doaj.org/toc/0160-4120Background: Children who have been critically ill face long-term developmental impairments. Iatrogenic exposure to di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP), a plasticizer leaching from plastic indwelling medical devices used in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), has been associated with the pronounced attention deficit observed in children 4 years after critical illness. As concerns about DEHP toxicity increased, governmental authorities urged the phase out of DEHP in indwelling medical devices and replacement with alternative plasticizers. We hypothesized that exposure to DEHP decreased over the years, attenuating the pronounced long-term attention deficit of these vulnerable children. Methods: We compared plasma concentrations of 3 oxidative DEHP metabolites (5cx-MEPP, 5OH-MEHP, 5oxo-MEHP) on the last PICU day in 216 patients who participated in the Tight Glucose Control study (2004–2007) and 334 patients who participated in the PEPaNIC study (2012–2015) and survived PICU stay. Corresponding minimal exposures to these metabolites (plasma concentration multiplied with number of days in PICU) were also evaluated. In patients with 4-year follow-up data, we compared measures of attention (standardized reaction times and consistency). Comparisons were performed with univariable analyses and multivariable linear regression analyses adjusted for baseline risk factors. Results: In the PEPaNIC patients, last PICU day plasma concentrations of 5cx-MEPP, 5OH-MEHP, 5oxo-MEHP and their sum, and corresponding minimal exposures, were reduced to 17–69% of those in the Tight Glucose Control study (p < 0.0001). Differences remained significant after multivariable adjustment (p ≤ 0.001). PEPaNIC patients did not show better attention than patients in the Tight Glucose Control study, also not after multivariable adjustment for risk factors. Conclusion: Exposure of critically ill children to DEHP in the PICU decreased over the years, but the lower exposure did not translate into improved attention 4 years later. Whether the residual exposure may still be toxic or whether the plasticizers replacing DEHP may not be safe for neurodevelopment needs further investigation.Ilse VanhorebeekGovindan MalarvannanFabian GüizaGiulia PomaInge DeresePieter J. WoutersKoen JoostenSascha VerbruggenPhilippe G. JorensAdrian CovaciGreet Van den BergheElsevierarticleCritical illnessChildrenMedical devicesPlasticizersDEHPAttentionEnvironmental sciencesGE1-350ENEnvironment International, Vol 158, Iss , Pp 106962- (2022)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Critical illness
Children
Medical devices
Plasticizers
DEHP
Attention
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
spellingShingle Critical illness
Children
Medical devices
Plasticizers
DEHP
Attention
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Ilse Vanhorebeek
Govindan Malarvannan
Fabian Güiza
Giulia Poma
Inge Derese
Pieter J. Wouters
Koen Joosten
Sascha Verbruggen
Philippe G. Jorens
Adrian Covaci
Greet Van den Berghe
Phasing out DEHP from plastic indwelling medical devices used for intensive care: Does it reduce the long-term attention deficit of critically ill children?
description Background: Children who have been critically ill face long-term developmental impairments. Iatrogenic exposure to di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP), a plasticizer leaching from plastic indwelling medical devices used in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), has been associated with the pronounced attention deficit observed in children 4 years after critical illness. As concerns about DEHP toxicity increased, governmental authorities urged the phase out of DEHP in indwelling medical devices and replacement with alternative plasticizers. We hypothesized that exposure to DEHP decreased over the years, attenuating the pronounced long-term attention deficit of these vulnerable children. Methods: We compared plasma concentrations of 3 oxidative DEHP metabolites (5cx-MEPP, 5OH-MEHP, 5oxo-MEHP) on the last PICU day in 216 patients who participated in the Tight Glucose Control study (2004–2007) and 334 patients who participated in the PEPaNIC study (2012–2015) and survived PICU stay. Corresponding minimal exposures to these metabolites (plasma concentration multiplied with number of days in PICU) were also evaluated. In patients with 4-year follow-up data, we compared measures of attention (standardized reaction times and consistency). Comparisons were performed with univariable analyses and multivariable linear regression analyses adjusted for baseline risk factors. Results: In the PEPaNIC patients, last PICU day plasma concentrations of 5cx-MEPP, 5OH-MEHP, 5oxo-MEHP and their sum, and corresponding minimal exposures, were reduced to 17–69% of those in the Tight Glucose Control study (p < 0.0001). Differences remained significant after multivariable adjustment (p ≤ 0.001). PEPaNIC patients did not show better attention than patients in the Tight Glucose Control study, also not after multivariable adjustment for risk factors. Conclusion: Exposure of critically ill children to DEHP in the PICU decreased over the years, but the lower exposure did not translate into improved attention 4 years later. Whether the residual exposure may still be toxic or whether the plasticizers replacing DEHP may not be safe for neurodevelopment needs further investigation.
format article
author Ilse Vanhorebeek
Govindan Malarvannan
Fabian Güiza
Giulia Poma
Inge Derese
Pieter J. Wouters
Koen Joosten
Sascha Verbruggen
Philippe G. Jorens
Adrian Covaci
Greet Van den Berghe
author_facet Ilse Vanhorebeek
Govindan Malarvannan
Fabian Güiza
Giulia Poma
Inge Derese
Pieter J. Wouters
Koen Joosten
Sascha Verbruggen
Philippe G. Jorens
Adrian Covaci
Greet Van den Berghe
author_sort Ilse Vanhorebeek
title Phasing out DEHP from plastic indwelling medical devices used for intensive care: Does it reduce the long-term attention deficit of critically ill children?
title_short Phasing out DEHP from plastic indwelling medical devices used for intensive care: Does it reduce the long-term attention deficit of critically ill children?
title_full Phasing out DEHP from plastic indwelling medical devices used for intensive care: Does it reduce the long-term attention deficit of critically ill children?
title_fullStr Phasing out DEHP from plastic indwelling medical devices used for intensive care: Does it reduce the long-term attention deficit of critically ill children?
title_full_unstemmed Phasing out DEHP from plastic indwelling medical devices used for intensive care: Does it reduce the long-term attention deficit of critically ill children?
title_sort phasing out dehp from plastic indwelling medical devices used for intensive care: does it reduce the long-term attention deficit of critically ill children?
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2022
url https://doaj.org/article/a576c375a9a543dcb0c6766ab077c13c
work_keys_str_mv AT ilsevanhorebeek phasingoutdehpfromplasticindwellingmedicaldevicesusedforintensivecaredoesitreducethelongtermattentiondeficitofcriticallyillchildren
AT govindanmalarvannan phasingoutdehpfromplasticindwellingmedicaldevicesusedforintensivecaredoesitreducethelongtermattentiondeficitofcriticallyillchildren
AT fabianguiza phasingoutdehpfromplasticindwellingmedicaldevicesusedforintensivecaredoesitreducethelongtermattentiondeficitofcriticallyillchildren
AT giuliapoma phasingoutdehpfromplasticindwellingmedicaldevicesusedforintensivecaredoesitreducethelongtermattentiondeficitofcriticallyillchildren
AT ingederese phasingoutdehpfromplasticindwellingmedicaldevicesusedforintensivecaredoesitreducethelongtermattentiondeficitofcriticallyillchildren
AT pieterjwouters phasingoutdehpfromplasticindwellingmedicaldevicesusedforintensivecaredoesitreducethelongtermattentiondeficitofcriticallyillchildren
AT koenjoosten phasingoutdehpfromplasticindwellingmedicaldevicesusedforintensivecaredoesitreducethelongtermattentiondeficitofcriticallyillchildren
AT saschaverbruggen phasingoutdehpfromplasticindwellingmedicaldevicesusedforintensivecaredoesitreducethelongtermattentiondeficitofcriticallyillchildren
AT philippegjorens phasingoutdehpfromplasticindwellingmedicaldevicesusedforintensivecaredoesitreducethelongtermattentiondeficitofcriticallyillchildren
AT adriancovaci phasingoutdehpfromplasticindwellingmedicaldevicesusedforintensivecaredoesitreducethelongtermattentiondeficitofcriticallyillchildren
AT greetvandenberghe phasingoutdehpfromplasticindwellingmedicaldevicesusedforintensivecaredoesitreducethelongtermattentiondeficitofcriticallyillchildren
_version_ 1718445291209752576