Can you escape the virtual room? A novel paradigm to assess avoidance behaviour

Anxiety patients often experience conflicts between approaching (pass barking dog) and avoiding (take detour) feared situations. In most experimental avoidance paradigms, response options are limited or forced, making it difficult to generalize the results to daily life situations. The aim of the pr...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pauline Dibbets, Anke Lemmens, Richard Benning, Tom Smeets
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a5814195dedf4d3684e322891e0170a8
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a5814195dedf4d3684e322891e0170a8
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a5814195dedf4d3684e322891e0170a82021-12-01T05:03:46ZCan you escape the virtual room? A novel paradigm to assess avoidance behaviour2451-958810.1016/j.chbr.2021.100061https://doaj.org/article/a5814195dedf4d3684e322891e0170a82021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958821000099https://doaj.org/toc/2451-9588Anxiety patients often experience conflicts between approaching (pass barking dog) and avoiding (take detour) feared situations. In most experimental avoidance paradigms, response options are limited or forced, making it difficult to generalize the results to daily life situations. The aim of the present study was twofold: 1) to develop a more ecologically valid avoidance paradigm; 2) to examine the influence of individual characteristics (trait anxiety; distress tolerance) on approach-avoidance behaviour. To encourage free exploration behaviour, a virtual reality (VR) escape room was developed. In this room, participants searched for cues to decipher a code-locked door. Opening a marked vase (conditioned stimulus, CS) was followed by a jump scare, a rat jumping out of the vase (unconditioned stimulus, US). Avoidance was measured via questionnaires and relative manipulation time of CS-marked (EXPgen) or nonmarked (CONT) objects in the room; questionnaires measured trait anxiety and distress tolerance. EXPgen participants reported higher US expectancies and more avoidance of the (marked) vase compared to the CONT participants, yet behavioural data did not support these ratings. Additionally, higher trait anxiety scores coincided with higher US expectancies before the jump scare. The current flexible free-exploratory paradigm provides multiple opportunities to examine avoidance behaviour in different populations and settings.Pauline DibbetsAnke LemmensRichard BenningTom SmeetsElsevierarticleVirtual realityFear conditioningAvoidance behaviourDistress toleranceTrait anxietyElectronic computers. Computer scienceQA75.5-76.95PsychologyBF1-990ENComputers in Human Behavior Reports, Vol 3, Iss , Pp 100061- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Virtual reality
Fear conditioning
Avoidance behaviour
Distress tolerance
Trait anxiety
Electronic computers. Computer science
QA75.5-76.95
Psychology
BF1-990
spellingShingle Virtual reality
Fear conditioning
Avoidance behaviour
Distress tolerance
Trait anxiety
Electronic computers. Computer science
QA75.5-76.95
Psychology
BF1-990
Pauline Dibbets
Anke Lemmens
Richard Benning
Tom Smeets
Can you escape the virtual room? A novel paradigm to assess avoidance behaviour
description Anxiety patients often experience conflicts between approaching (pass barking dog) and avoiding (take detour) feared situations. In most experimental avoidance paradigms, response options are limited or forced, making it difficult to generalize the results to daily life situations. The aim of the present study was twofold: 1) to develop a more ecologically valid avoidance paradigm; 2) to examine the influence of individual characteristics (trait anxiety; distress tolerance) on approach-avoidance behaviour. To encourage free exploration behaviour, a virtual reality (VR) escape room was developed. In this room, participants searched for cues to decipher a code-locked door. Opening a marked vase (conditioned stimulus, CS) was followed by a jump scare, a rat jumping out of the vase (unconditioned stimulus, US). Avoidance was measured via questionnaires and relative manipulation time of CS-marked (EXPgen) or nonmarked (CONT) objects in the room; questionnaires measured trait anxiety and distress tolerance. EXPgen participants reported higher US expectancies and more avoidance of the (marked) vase compared to the CONT participants, yet behavioural data did not support these ratings. Additionally, higher trait anxiety scores coincided with higher US expectancies before the jump scare. The current flexible free-exploratory paradigm provides multiple opportunities to examine avoidance behaviour in different populations and settings.
format article
author Pauline Dibbets
Anke Lemmens
Richard Benning
Tom Smeets
author_facet Pauline Dibbets
Anke Lemmens
Richard Benning
Tom Smeets
author_sort Pauline Dibbets
title Can you escape the virtual room? A novel paradigm to assess avoidance behaviour
title_short Can you escape the virtual room? A novel paradigm to assess avoidance behaviour
title_full Can you escape the virtual room? A novel paradigm to assess avoidance behaviour
title_fullStr Can you escape the virtual room? A novel paradigm to assess avoidance behaviour
title_full_unstemmed Can you escape the virtual room? A novel paradigm to assess avoidance behaviour
title_sort can you escape the virtual room? a novel paradigm to assess avoidance behaviour
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/a5814195dedf4d3684e322891e0170a8
work_keys_str_mv AT paulinedibbets canyouescapethevirtualroomanovelparadigmtoassessavoidancebehaviour
AT ankelemmens canyouescapethevirtualroomanovelparadigmtoassessavoidancebehaviour
AT richardbenning canyouescapethevirtualroomanovelparadigmtoassessavoidancebehaviour
AT tomsmeets canyouescapethevirtualroomanovelparadigmtoassessavoidancebehaviour
_version_ 1718405562338639872