Being the Winner Is Being the Loser When Playing a Parental Tug-of-War – A New Framework on Stability of Biparental Care

Because there are basic sexual differences in reproductive potential, and the cost of parental care is assumed to be high, biparental care is viewed as a constant tug-of-war between the partners. This raises the question of the system’s evolutionary stability. Several models have been proposed to re...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Katarzyna Wojczulanis-Jakubas
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a59fc26f24af4011940251ed4fa26293
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a59fc26f24af4011940251ed4fa26293
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a59fc26f24af4011940251ed4fa262932021-11-11T13:19:07ZBeing the Winner Is Being the Loser When Playing a Parental Tug-of-War – A New Framework on Stability of Biparental Care2296-701X10.3389/fevo.2021.763075https://doaj.org/article/a59fc26f24af4011940251ed4fa262932021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.763075/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2296-701XBecause there are basic sexual differences in reproductive potential, and the cost of parental care is assumed to be high, biparental care is viewed as a constant tug-of-war between the partners. This raises the question of the system’s evolutionary stability. Several models have been proposed to resolve this problem but none has received unequivocal support. Here, I propose a framework that not only integrates the earlier theoretical ideas (sealed bids, negotiation) but also considers the importance of the environment (frequently neglected in previous models) and views the cost of parental care from a different perspective (costly in terms of parent’s survival only when performed close to the boundary of parental capacity). The framework suggests that sexual conflict may not be such a significant factor mediating parental care as commonly assumed, and that a parent trying to shift the parental burden onto the partner – assumed to be the winner in the tug-of-war interplay – is actually more likely to be a loser, as doing so may put the success of the current breeding attempt in jeopardy, thereby reducing overall fitness of the parent. Once it is realized that the importance of sexual conflict is actually much less than it seems, it becomes clear that the stability of the biparental care system no longer seems to be such a puzzling issue.Katarzyna Wojczulanis-JakubasFrontiers Media S.A.articleenvironmentparental careparental compensationparental desertiontheoretical modelEvolutionQH359-425EcologyQH540-549.5ENFrontiers in Ecology and Evolution, Vol 9 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic environment
parental care
parental compensation
parental desertion
theoretical model
Evolution
QH359-425
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle environment
parental care
parental compensation
parental desertion
theoretical model
Evolution
QH359-425
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Katarzyna Wojczulanis-Jakubas
Being the Winner Is Being the Loser When Playing a Parental Tug-of-War – A New Framework on Stability of Biparental Care
description Because there are basic sexual differences in reproductive potential, and the cost of parental care is assumed to be high, biparental care is viewed as a constant tug-of-war between the partners. This raises the question of the system’s evolutionary stability. Several models have been proposed to resolve this problem but none has received unequivocal support. Here, I propose a framework that not only integrates the earlier theoretical ideas (sealed bids, negotiation) but also considers the importance of the environment (frequently neglected in previous models) and views the cost of parental care from a different perspective (costly in terms of parent’s survival only when performed close to the boundary of parental capacity). The framework suggests that sexual conflict may not be such a significant factor mediating parental care as commonly assumed, and that a parent trying to shift the parental burden onto the partner – assumed to be the winner in the tug-of-war interplay – is actually more likely to be a loser, as doing so may put the success of the current breeding attempt in jeopardy, thereby reducing overall fitness of the parent. Once it is realized that the importance of sexual conflict is actually much less than it seems, it becomes clear that the stability of the biparental care system no longer seems to be such a puzzling issue.
format article
author Katarzyna Wojczulanis-Jakubas
author_facet Katarzyna Wojczulanis-Jakubas
author_sort Katarzyna Wojczulanis-Jakubas
title Being the Winner Is Being the Loser When Playing a Parental Tug-of-War – A New Framework on Stability of Biparental Care
title_short Being the Winner Is Being the Loser When Playing a Parental Tug-of-War – A New Framework on Stability of Biparental Care
title_full Being the Winner Is Being the Loser When Playing a Parental Tug-of-War – A New Framework on Stability of Biparental Care
title_fullStr Being the Winner Is Being the Loser When Playing a Parental Tug-of-War – A New Framework on Stability of Biparental Care
title_full_unstemmed Being the Winner Is Being the Loser When Playing a Parental Tug-of-War – A New Framework on Stability of Biparental Care
title_sort being the winner is being the loser when playing a parental tug-of-war – a new framework on stability of biparental care
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/a59fc26f24af4011940251ed4fa26293
work_keys_str_mv AT katarzynawojczulanisjakubas beingthewinnerisbeingtheloserwhenplayingaparentaltugofwaranewframeworkonstabilityofbiparentalcare
_version_ 1718439061700476928