“Evidence-based Policy” and “Policy of Evidence”: The Dilemma of Post-Soviet Societies
External and internalchallenges, risks and crisis phenomena operatingin the world and national states requirethe ruling regimes to flexibly restructurethe configuration of relations betweenpower and society. One of the toolsof such communication is the methods of“evidence-based policy”, which involv...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN RU |
| Publicado: |
Ассоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”)
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/a5cc840a02f743058dd8f4482f025165 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:a5cc840a02f743058dd8f4482f025165 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:a5cc840a02f743058dd8f4482f0251652021-11-07T14:45:05Z“Evidence-based Policy” and “Policy of Evidence”: The Dilemma of Post-Soviet Societies2542-02402587-932410.23932/2542-0240-2021-14-5-3https://doaj.org/article/a5cc840a02f743058dd8f4482f0251652021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/854https://doaj.org/toc/2542-0240https://doaj.org/toc/2587-9324External and internalchallenges, risks and crisis phenomena operatingin the world and national states requirethe ruling regimes to flexibly restructurethe configuration of relations betweenpower and society. One of the toolsof such communication is the methods of“evidence-based policy”, which involve addressingthe population on the basis of expertand scientific recommendations whendeveloping goals that allow people not onlyto judge their legality, but also to challengeand correct their content. At the same time,in a number of transitional and authoritarianstates, preference is given to the “policy ofevidence” that demonstrates the priorities ofpolitically expedient actions of the authoritiesaimed not at partnership with society, but at mobilizing the support of the populationfor the implementation of the goalsof government policy. In this context, thearticle shows the objective and subjectivelimitations of the use of scientific andexpert data in the public sphere by a numberof post-Soviet states, the peculiarities ofthe correlation of “evidence-based policy”and “policy of evidence” in the activities ofthe ruling regimes, and assesses their prospectsin the short term in modern Russiansociety.A. I. SolovievАссоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”)articleevidence-based policypolicy of evidencegovernmentsocietyruling regimestransitional political systemspost-soviet statesevidence policyevidence policypolitical trustInternational relationsJZ2-6530ENRUКонтуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право, Vol 14, Iss 5, Pp 61-80 (2021) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN RU |
| topic |
evidence-based policy policy of evidence government society ruling regimes transitional political systems post-soviet states evidence policy evidence policy political trust International relations JZ2-6530 |
| spellingShingle |
evidence-based policy policy of evidence government society ruling regimes transitional political systems post-soviet states evidence policy evidence policy political trust International relations JZ2-6530 A. I. Soloviev “Evidence-based Policy” and “Policy of Evidence”: The Dilemma of Post-Soviet Societies |
| description |
External and internalchallenges, risks and crisis phenomena operatingin the world and national states requirethe ruling regimes to flexibly restructurethe configuration of relations betweenpower and society. One of the toolsof such communication is the methods of“evidence-based policy”, which involve addressingthe population on the basis of expertand scientific recommendations whendeveloping goals that allow people not onlyto judge their legality, but also to challengeand correct their content. At the same time,in a number of transitional and authoritarianstates, preference is given to the “policy ofevidence” that demonstrates the priorities ofpolitically expedient actions of the authoritiesaimed not at partnership with society, but at mobilizing the support of the populationfor the implementation of the goalsof government policy. In this context, thearticle shows the objective and subjectivelimitations of the use of scientific andexpert data in the public sphere by a numberof post-Soviet states, the peculiarities ofthe correlation of “evidence-based policy”and “policy of evidence” in the activities ofthe ruling regimes, and assesses their prospectsin the short term in modern Russiansociety. |
| format |
article |
| author |
A. I. Soloviev |
| author_facet |
A. I. Soloviev |
| author_sort |
A. I. Soloviev |
| title |
“Evidence-based Policy” and “Policy of Evidence”: The Dilemma of Post-Soviet Societies |
| title_short |
“Evidence-based Policy” and “Policy of Evidence”: The Dilemma of Post-Soviet Societies |
| title_full |
“Evidence-based Policy” and “Policy of Evidence”: The Dilemma of Post-Soviet Societies |
| title_fullStr |
“Evidence-based Policy” and “Policy of Evidence”: The Dilemma of Post-Soviet Societies |
| title_full_unstemmed |
“Evidence-based Policy” and “Policy of Evidence”: The Dilemma of Post-Soviet Societies |
| title_sort |
“evidence-based policy” and “policy of evidence”: the dilemma of post-soviet societies |
| publisher |
Ассоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”) |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/a5cc840a02f743058dd8f4482f025165 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT aisoloviev evidencebasedpolicyandpolicyofevidencethedilemmaofpostsovietsocieties |
| _version_ |
1718443303900282880 |