Formes et valeurs du passif en tamazight
It is generally accepted that the Amazigh passive is realized by three forms : mm-, ttw- and the zero morpheme in the case of mixed verbs. It is often not explained why we find three different ways of expressing the same linguistic reality, which is in flagrant contradiction with the rule of linguis...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | FR |
| Publicado: |
OpenEdition
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/a5ecb59230ba453db815cfee402420fd |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | It is generally accepted that the Amazigh passive is realized by three forms : mm-, ttw- and the zero morpheme in the case of mixed verbs. It is often not explained why we find three different ways of expressing the same linguistic reality, which is in flagrant contradiction with the rule of linguistic economy valid for all natural languages. We will, within the framework of this contribution, try to remedy it by explaining the semantic and functional values of each of these forms. We will also try to show the emergence of a fourth form. Indeed, derivatives in n-/nn- have always been considered as phonetically conditioned variants of the form in mm-, which is certainly true on the diachronic level. However, in synchrony, we have noted combinations of this morpheme with verbs incompatible with the passive morpheme mm-. These cases being extremely rare, we think that it’s about the beginning of appearance of a new form. |
|---|