Does Corporate Social Responsibility Vary by Real Estate Asset Types? Evidence from Real Estate Investment Trusts

This paper investigates how real estate investment trusts’ corporate social responsibility (CSR) (REITs) varies by two intrinsic firm factors: real estate asset types and REITs’ financial aspirations. We develop a conceptual model to demonstrate the theoretical role of these intrinsic firm factors i...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jian Liang, Ameeta Jain, Hao Wu
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
CSR
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a61be95c0ca645f6a069486f8a0fa3df
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a61be95c0ca645f6a069486f8a0fa3df
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a61be95c0ca645f6a069486f8a0fa3df2021-11-25T19:04:43ZDoes Corporate Social Responsibility Vary by Real Estate Asset Types? Evidence from Real Estate Investment Trusts10.3390/su1322128362071-1050https://doaj.org/article/a61be95c0ca645f6a069486f8a0fa3df2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12836https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050This paper investigates how real estate investment trusts’ corporate social responsibility (CSR) (REITs) varies by two intrinsic firm factors: real estate asset types and REITs’ financial aspirations. We develop a conceptual model to demonstrate the theoretical role of these intrinsic firm factors in moderating CSR. Using a database containing the Morgan Stanley Capital International CSR rating index, we test REITs from 19 countries for variations of their CSR performance across each of the three pillars of CSR: environment, social, and governance (ES&G) by real estate asset types from 2009 to 2016. The results show that REITs focusing on less market-transparent real assets relying heavily on intensive human-based services and physical capital in property management like hotels and hospitals exhibit a poorer performance in environmental responsibility, social responsibility, and overall CSR score. We found no significant difference between the REITs in their governance responsibility with respect to the real estate asset types. We found that moderation by financial aspiration in establishing their CSR strategies varies by the types of real estate asset that REITs focus on, with the maximum positive impact on REITS with hotel holdings and negative impact on REITs with office and retail assets.Jian LiangAmeeta JainHao WuMDPI AGarticleCSRREITsasset typefinancial aspirationEnvironmental effects of industries and plantsTD194-195Renewable energy sourcesTJ807-830Environmental sciencesGE1-350ENSustainability, Vol 13, Iss 12836, p 12836 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic CSR
REITs
asset type
financial aspiration
Environmental effects of industries and plants
TD194-195
Renewable energy sources
TJ807-830
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
spellingShingle CSR
REITs
asset type
financial aspiration
Environmental effects of industries and plants
TD194-195
Renewable energy sources
TJ807-830
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Jian Liang
Ameeta Jain
Hao Wu
Does Corporate Social Responsibility Vary by Real Estate Asset Types? Evidence from Real Estate Investment Trusts
description This paper investigates how real estate investment trusts’ corporate social responsibility (CSR) (REITs) varies by two intrinsic firm factors: real estate asset types and REITs’ financial aspirations. We develop a conceptual model to demonstrate the theoretical role of these intrinsic firm factors in moderating CSR. Using a database containing the Morgan Stanley Capital International CSR rating index, we test REITs from 19 countries for variations of their CSR performance across each of the three pillars of CSR: environment, social, and governance (ES&G) by real estate asset types from 2009 to 2016. The results show that REITs focusing on less market-transparent real assets relying heavily on intensive human-based services and physical capital in property management like hotels and hospitals exhibit a poorer performance in environmental responsibility, social responsibility, and overall CSR score. We found no significant difference between the REITs in their governance responsibility with respect to the real estate asset types. We found that moderation by financial aspiration in establishing their CSR strategies varies by the types of real estate asset that REITs focus on, with the maximum positive impact on REITS with hotel holdings and negative impact on REITs with office and retail assets.
format article
author Jian Liang
Ameeta Jain
Hao Wu
author_facet Jian Liang
Ameeta Jain
Hao Wu
author_sort Jian Liang
title Does Corporate Social Responsibility Vary by Real Estate Asset Types? Evidence from Real Estate Investment Trusts
title_short Does Corporate Social Responsibility Vary by Real Estate Asset Types? Evidence from Real Estate Investment Trusts
title_full Does Corporate Social Responsibility Vary by Real Estate Asset Types? Evidence from Real Estate Investment Trusts
title_fullStr Does Corporate Social Responsibility Vary by Real Estate Asset Types? Evidence from Real Estate Investment Trusts
title_full_unstemmed Does Corporate Social Responsibility Vary by Real Estate Asset Types? Evidence from Real Estate Investment Trusts
title_sort does corporate social responsibility vary by real estate asset types? evidence from real estate investment trusts
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/a61be95c0ca645f6a069486f8a0fa3df
work_keys_str_mv AT jianliang doescorporatesocialresponsibilityvarybyrealestateassettypesevidencefromrealestateinvestmenttrusts
AT ameetajain doescorporatesocialresponsibilityvarybyrealestateassettypesevidencefromrealestateinvestmenttrusts
AT haowu doescorporatesocialresponsibilityvarybyrealestateassettypesevidencefromrealestateinvestmenttrusts
_version_ 1718410355941572608