Countering Acts of Dispossession through Alberto Blest Gana’s Mariluán

In the scant scholarship relative to Alberto Blest Gana’s Mariluán, several critics have underscored the unfeasibility or superfluidity of the protagonist’s aspired project for restitution, indigenous assimilation, and fraternity in the Araucanía during the novel’s context of enunciation. Under the...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: DeLutis-Eichenberger Angela N.
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: De Gruyter 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a622b225db714ecba0d9552aa1c83c18
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a622b225db714ecba0d9552aa1c83c18
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a622b225db714ecba0d9552aa1c83c182021-12-05T14:10:45ZCountering Acts of Dispossession through Alberto Blest Gana’s Mariluán2451-347410.1515/culture-2021-0010https://doaj.org/article/a622b225db714ecba0d9552aa1c83c182021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1515/culture-2021-0010https://doaj.org/toc/2451-3474In the scant scholarship relative to Alberto Blest Gana’s Mariluán, several critics have underscored the unfeasibility or superfluidity of the protagonist’s aspired project for restitution, indigenous assimilation, and fraternity in the Araucanía during the novel’s context of enunciation. Under the theoretical framework of Athena Athanasiou and Judith Butler on dispossession, and in dialogue with the concept of “sediments of time” by Reinhart Koselleck, this study argues that an analysis of the overlapping chronologies in “play” in Mariluán serves to revise the statements seemingly offered for advancement nearly 160 years ago. Mariluán’s pseudo-revival of a Lautaro and the manner in which he makes himself “present” or “becoming,” and remains “present” after his beheading, can be re-signified as a means to challenge the terms imposed from structures that inhibit, subjugate, and seek to fully exterminate or nullify the “other” – insomuch in the 1860s, as in future temporalities involving repetitions of historical events and their related, yet distinguishable, singularities. Through a reconsideration of the protagonist’s aims that refute his call for cultural assimilation as a necessary means of integration, today’s status quo on indigenous issues can be re-problematised, to contest the pervasive logic of dispossession and advocate for more practical and politically inclusive structures that celebrate Chile’s plurality.DeLutis-Eichenberger Angela N.De Gruyterarticleblest ganamariluánmapucheconstitutiondispossessionSocial sciences (General)H1-99ENOpen Cultural Studies, Vol 5, Iss 1, Pp 107-122 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic blest gana
mariluán
mapuche
constitution
dispossession
Social sciences (General)
H1-99
spellingShingle blest gana
mariluán
mapuche
constitution
dispossession
Social sciences (General)
H1-99
DeLutis-Eichenberger Angela N.
Countering Acts of Dispossession through Alberto Blest Gana’s Mariluán
description In the scant scholarship relative to Alberto Blest Gana’s Mariluán, several critics have underscored the unfeasibility or superfluidity of the protagonist’s aspired project for restitution, indigenous assimilation, and fraternity in the Araucanía during the novel’s context of enunciation. Under the theoretical framework of Athena Athanasiou and Judith Butler on dispossession, and in dialogue with the concept of “sediments of time” by Reinhart Koselleck, this study argues that an analysis of the overlapping chronologies in “play” in Mariluán serves to revise the statements seemingly offered for advancement nearly 160 years ago. Mariluán’s pseudo-revival of a Lautaro and the manner in which he makes himself “present” or “becoming,” and remains “present” after his beheading, can be re-signified as a means to challenge the terms imposed from structures that inhibit, subjugate, and seek to fully exterminate or nullify the “other” – insomuch in the 1860s, as in future temporalities involving repetitions of historical events and their related, yet distinguishable, singularities. Through a reconsideration of the protagonist’s aims that refute his call for cultural assimilation as a necessary means of integration, today’s status quo on indigenous issues can be re-problematised, to contest the pervasive logic of dispossession and advocate for more practical and politically inclusive structures that celebrate Chile’s plurality.
format article
author DeLutis-Eichenberger Angela N.
author_facet DeLutis-Eichenberger Angela N.
author_sort DeLutis-Eichenberger Angela N.
title Countering Acts of Dispossession through Alberto Blest Gana’s Mariluán
title_short Countering Acts of Dispossession through Alberto Blest Gana’s Mariluán
title_full Countering Acts of Dispossession through Alberto Blest Gana’s Mariluán
title_fullStr Countering Acts of Dispossession through Alberto Blest Gana’s Mariluán
title_full_unstemmed Countering Acts of Dispossession through Alberto Blest Gana’s Mariluán
title_sort countering acts of dispossession through alberto blest gana’s mariluán
publisher De Gruyter
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/a622b225db714ecba0d9552aa1c83c18
work_keys_str_mv AT delutiseichenbergerangelan counteringactsofdispossessionthroughalbertoblestganasmariluan
_version_ 1718371767813144576